TSTP Solution File: DAT334_23 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : DAT334_23 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:37:24 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.84s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : DAT334_23 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:15:06 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.84/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.84/1.72  
% 2.84/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.93/1.75  %$ teach > #nlpp > sue > psych > math > mary > john > cs > #skF_1 > #skF_2 > #skF_3
% 2.93/1.75  
% 2.93/1.75  %Foreground sorts:
% 2.93/1.75  tff($ki_world, type, $ki_world: $tType ).
% 2.93/1.75  
% 2.93/1.75  %Background operators:
% 2.93/1.75  
% 2.93/1.75  
% 2.93/1.75  %Foreground operators:
% 2.93/1.75  tff(sue, type, sue: $i).
% 2.93/1.75  tff('#skF_1', type, '#skF_1': $ki_world > $i).
% 2.93/1.75  tff(psych, type, psych: $i).
% 2.93/1.75  tff(teach, type, teach: ($ki_world * $i * $i) > $o).
% 2.93/1.75  tff(math, type, math: $i).
% 2.93/1.75  tff('#skF_2', type, '#skF_2': $ki_world > $i).
% 2.93/1.75  tff(mary, type, mary: $i).
% 2.93/1.75  tff(john, type, john: $i).
% 2.93/1.75  tff('#skF_3', type, '#skF_3': $ki_world).
% 2.93/1.75  tff(cs, type, cs: $i).
% 2.93/1.75  
% 2.93/1.76  tff(f_30, axiom, (![W:$ki_world, V:$ki_world]: $ki_accessible(W, V)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mrel_universal)).
% 2.93/1.76  tff(f_48, axiom, (![W:$ki_world]: ($ki_accessible($ki_local_world, W) => (((teach(W, john, math) & (?[X]: ($ki_exists_in_world_$i(W, X) & teach(W, X, cs)))) & teach(W, mary, psych)) & teach(W, sue, psych)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', db)).
% 2.93/1.76  tff(f_32, axiom, (![W:$ki_world, X]: $ki_exists_in_world_$i(W, X)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', $ki_exists_in_world_$i_const)).
% 2.93/1.76  tff(f_56, negated_conjecture, ~(![W:$ki_world]: ($ki_accessible($ki_local_world, W) => (?[X]: ($ki_exists_in_world_$i(W, X) & teach(W, X, cs))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', verify)).
% 2.93/1.76  tff(c_2, plain, (![W_1:$ki_world, V_2:$ki_world]: ($ki_accessible(W_1, V_2))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_30])).
% 2.93/1.76  tff(c_12, plain, (![W_7:$ki_world]: (teach(W_7, '#skF_2'(W_7), cs) | ~$ki_accessible($ki_local_world, W_7))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_48])).
% 2.93/1.76  tff(c_40, plain, (![W_19:$ki_world]: (teach(W_19, '#skF_2'(W_19), cs))), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_2, c_12])).
% 2.93/1.76  tff(c_4, plain, (![W_3:$ki_world, X_4]: ($ki_exists_in_world_$i(W_3, X_4))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_32])).
% 2.93/1.76  tff(c_18, plain, (![X_10]: (~teach('#skF_3', X_10, cs) | ~$ki_exists_in_world_$i('#skF_3', X_10))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_56])).
% 2.93/1.76  tff(c_23, plain, (![X_10]: (~teach('#skF_3', X_10, cs))), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_4, c_18])).
% 2.93/1.76  tff(c_45, plain, $false, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_40, c_23])).
% 2.93/1.76  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.93/1.76  
% 2.93/1.76  Inference rules
% 2.93/1.76  ----------------------
% 2.93/1.76  #Ref     : 0
% 2.93/1.76  #Sup     : 1
% 2.93/1.76  #Fact    : 0
% 2.93/1.76  #Define  : 0
% 2.93/1.76  #Split   : 0
% 2.93/1.76  #Chain   : 0
% 2.93/1.76  #Close   : 0
% 2.93/1.76  
% 2.93/1.76  Ordering : KBO
% 2.93/1.76  
% 2.93/1.76  Simplification rules
% 2.93/1.76  ----------------------
% 2.93/1.76  #Subsume      : 0
% 2.93/1.76  #Demod        : 8
% 2.93/1.76  #Tautology    : 3
% 2.93/1.76  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 2.93/1.76  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.93/1.76  
% 2.93/1.76  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.93/1.76  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.93/1.76  
% 2.93/1.76  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.93/1.76  ----------------------
% 2.93/1.76  Preprocessing        : 0.48
% 2.93/1.76  Parsing              : 0.29
% 2.93/1.76  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 2.93/1.76  Main loop            : 0.16
% 2.93/1.76  Inferencing          : 0.05
% 2.93/1.76  Reduction            : 0.05
% 2.93/1.76  Demodulation         : 0.04
% 2.93/1.77  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 2.93/1.77  Subsumption          : 0.03
% 2.93/1.77  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 2.93/1.77  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.93/1.77  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.93/1.77  Total                : 0.70
% 2.93/1.77  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.93/1.77  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.93/1.77  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.93/1.77  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------