TSTP Solution File: DAT098_1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : DAT098_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 05:06:01 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.42s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  13 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  121 (  28 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  144 (  54   ~;  45   |;  39   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :  134 (  38 atm;   0 fun;  66 num;  30 var)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (   7   >;   5   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (  42   !;  16   ?;  58   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
    list: $tType ).

tff(func_def_0,type,
    nil: list ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    cons: ( $int * list ) > list ).

tff(func_def_2,type,
    head: list > $int ).

tff(func_def_3,type,
    tail: list > list ).

tff(func_def_11,type,
    sK1: ( $int * list ) > $int ).

tff(func_def_12,type,
    sK2: ( $int * list ) > list ).

tff(pred_def_1,type,
    inRange: ( $int * list ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_4,type,
    sP0: ( $int * list ) > $o ).

tff(f1136,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f1135,f46]) ).

tff(f46,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] : sP0(X0,nil),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f41]) ).

tff(f41,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: list] :
      ( sP0(X0,X1)
      | ( nil != X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

tff(f30,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: list] :
      ( ( sP0(X0,X1)
        | ( ! [X2: $int,X3: list] :
              ( ~ inRange(X0,X3)
              | ~ $less(X2,X0)
              | $less(X2,0)
              | ( cons(X2,X3) != X1 ) )
          & ( nil != X1 ) ) )
      & ( ( inRange(X0,sK2(X0,X1))
          & $less(sK1(X0,X1),X0)
          & ~ $less(sK1(X0,X1),0)
          & ( cons(sK1(X0,X1),sK2(X0,X1)) = X1 ) )
        | ( nil = X1 )
        | ~ sP0(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2])],[f28,f29]) ).

tff(f29,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: list] :
      ( ? [X4: $int,X5: list] :
          ( inRange(X0,X5)
          & $less(X4,X0)
          & ~ $less(X4,0)
          & ( cons(X4,X5) = X1 ) )
     => ( inRange(X0,sK2(X0,X1))
        & $less(sK1(X0,X1),X0)
        & ~ $less(sK1(X0,X1),0)
        & ( cons(sK1(X0,X1),sK2(X0,X1)) = X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f28,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: list] :
      ( ( sP0(X0,X1)
        | ( ! [X2: $int,X3: list] :
              ( ~ inRange(X0,X3)
              | ~ $less(X2,X0)
              | $less(X2,0)
              | ( cons(X2,X3) != X1 ) )
          & ( nil != X1 ) ) )
      & ( ? [X4: $int,X5: list] :
            ( inRange(X0,X5)
            & $less(X4,X0)
            & ~ $less(X4,0)
            & ( cons(X4,X5) = X1 ) )
        | ( nil = X1 )
        | ~ sP0(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f27]) ).

tff(f27,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: list] :
      ( ( sP0(X0,X1)
        | ( ! [X2: $int,X3: list] :
              ( ~ inRange(X0,X3)
              | ~ $less(X2,X0)
              | $less(X2,0)
              | ( cons(X2,X3) != X1 ) )
          & ( nil != X1 ) ) )
      & ( ? [X2: $int,X3: list] :
            ( inRange(X0,X3)
            & $less(X2,X0)
            & ~ $less(X2,0)
            & ( cons(X2,X3) = X1 ) )
        | ( nil = X1 )
        | ~ sP0(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f26]) ).

tff(f26,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: list] :
      ( ( sP0(X0,X1)
        | ( ! [X2: $int,X3: list] :
              ( ~ inRange(X0,X3)
              | ~ $less(X2,X0)
              | $less(X2,0)
              | ( cons(X2,X3) != X1 ) )
          & ( nil != X1 ) ) )
      & ( ? [X2: $int,X3: list] :
            ( inRange(X0,X3)
            & $less(X2,X0)
            & ~ $less(X2,0)
            & ( cons(X2,X3) = X1 ) )
        | ( nil = X1 )
        | ~ sP0(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tff(f24,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: list] :
      ( sP0(X0,X1)
    <=> ( ? [X2: $int,X3: list] :
            ( inRange(X0,X3)
            & $less(X2,X0)
            & ~ $less(X2,0)
            & ( cons(X2,X3) = X1 ) )
        | ( nil = X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(predicate_definition_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP0])]) ).

tff(f1135,plain,
    ~ sP0(4,nil),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1134,f44]) ).

tff(f44,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: list] :
      ( inRange(X0,X1)
      | ~ sP0(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tff(f31,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: list] :
      ( ( inRange(X0,X1)
        | ~ sP0(X0,X1) )
      & ( sP0(X0,X1)
        | ~ inRange(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: list] :
      ( inRange(X0,X1)
    <=> sP0(X0,X1) ),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f23,f24]) ).

tff(f23,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: list] :
      ( inRange(X0,X1)
    <=> ( ? [X2: $int,X3: list] :
            ( inRange(X0,X3)
            & $less(X2,X0)
            & ~ $less(X2,0)
            & ( cons(X2,X3) = X1 ) )
        | ( nil = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f8,plain,
    ! [X2: $int,X1: list] :
      ( inRange(X2,X1)
    <=> ( ? [X0: $int,X3: list] :
            ( inRange(X2,X3)
            & $less(X0,X2)
            & ~ $less(X0,0)
            & ( cons(X0,X3) = X1 ) )
        | ( nil = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(theory_normalization,[],[f5]) ).

tff(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2: $int,X1: list] :
      ( inRange(X2,X1)
    <=> ( ? [X0: $int,X3: list] :
            ( inRange(X2,X3)
            & $less(X0,X2)
            & $lesseq(0,X0)
            & ( cons(X0,X3) = X1 ) )
        | ( nil = X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inRange) ).

tff(f1134,plain,
    ~ inRange(4,nil),
    inference(evaluation,[],[f1132]) ).

tff(f1132,plain,
    ( ~ inRange(4,nil)
    | ~ $less(2,4)
    | $less(2,0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1131,f45]) ).

tff(f45,plain,
    ! [X2: $int,X3: list,X0: $int] :
      ( sP0(X0,cons(X2,X3))
      | ~ inRange(X0,X3)
      | ~ $less(X2,X0)
      | $less(X2,0) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f42]) ).

tff(f42,plain,
    ! [X2: $int,X3: list,X0: $int,X1: list] :
      ( sP0(X0,X1)
      | ~ inRange(X0,X3)
      | ~ $less(X2,X0)
      | $less(X2,0)
      | ( cons(X2,X3) != X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

tff(f1131,plain,
    ~ sP0(4,cons(2,nil)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1130,f44]) ).

tff(f1130,plain,
    ~ inRange(4,cons(2,nil)),
    inference(evaluation,[],[f1128]) ).

tff(f1128,plain,
    ( ~ inRange(4,cons(2,nil))
    | ~ $less(3,4)
    | $less(3,0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1127,f45]) ).

tff(f1127,plain,
    ~ sP0(4,cons(3,cons(2,nil))),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1126,f44]) ).

tff(f1126,plain,
    ~ inRange(4,cons(3,cons(2,nil))),
    inference(evaluation,[],[f1123]) ).

tff(f1123,plain,
    ( ~ inRange(4,cons(3,cons(2,nil)))
    | ~ $less(1,4)
    | $less(1,0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f45,f48]) ).

tff(f48,plain,
    ~ sP0(4,cons(1,cons(3,cons(2,nil)))),
    inference(resolution,[],[f44,f32]) ).

tff(f32,plain,
    ~ inRange(4,cons(1,cons(3,cons(2,nil)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    ~ inRange(4,cons(1,cons(3,cons(2,nil)))),
    inference(flattening,[],[f7]) ).

tff(f7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inRange(4,cons(1,cons(3,cons(2,nil)))),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f6]) ).

tff(f6,conjecture,
    inRange(4,cons(1,cons(3,cons(2,nil)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.15  % Problem    : DAT098_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.13/0.16  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.37  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.38  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.38  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.38  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 12:50:59 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.38  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.38  % (24294)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.21/0.40  % (24297)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.21/0.40  % (24295)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.40  % (24295)WARNING: trying to run FMB on interpreted or otherwise provably infinite-domain problem!
% 0.21/0.40  % (24295)Terminated due to inappropriate strategy.
% 0.21/0.40  % (24295)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.40  % (24295)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.21/0.40  % (24295)Termination reason: Inappropriate
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  % (24295)Memory used [KB]: 730
% 0.21/0.40  % (24295)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.40  % (24295)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.40  % (24298)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.40  % (24296)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.40  % (24299)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.40  % (24295)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.40  % (24295)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.40  % (24297)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.40  % (24300)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.40  % (24301)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.40  % (24298)WARNING: trying to run FMB on interpreted or otherwise provably infinite-domain problem!
% 0.21/0.40  % (24298)Terminated due to inappropriate strategy.
% 0.21/0.40  % (24298)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.40  % (24298)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.21/0.40  % (24296)WARNING: trying to run FMB on interpreted or otherwise provably infinite-domain problem!
% 0.21/0.40  % (24298)Termination reason: Inappropriate
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  % (24298)Memory used [KB]: 730
% 0.21/0.40  % (24298)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.40  % (24298)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.40  % (24296)Terminated due to inappropriate strategy.
% 0.21/0.40  % (24296)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.40  % (24296)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.21/0.40  % (24296)Termination reason: Inappropriate
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  % (24296)Memory used [KB]: 730
% 0.21/0.40  % (24296)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.40  % (24296)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.40  % (24298)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.40  % (24298)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.40  % (24296)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.40  % (24296)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.41  % (24302)fmb+10_1_fmbas=expand:fmbsr=1.1:gsp=on:nm=4_411 on theBenchmark for (411ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.41  % (24302)WARNING: trying to run FMB on interpreted or otherwise provably infinite-domain problem!
% 0.21/0.41  % (24302)Terminated due to inappropriate strategy.
% 0.21/0.41  % (24302)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.41  % (24302)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.21/0.41  % (24302)Termination reason: Inappropriate
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  % (24302)Memory used [KB]: 729
% 0.21/0.41  % (24302)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.41  % (24302)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.41  % (24302)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.41  % (24302)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.41  % (24303)ott+1_9_av=off:bd=off:bs=on:gsp=on:lcm=predicate:nm=4:sp=weighted_frequency:urr=on_382 on theBenchmark for (382ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.41  % (24304)lrs-11_2:5_fsd=off:fde=none:nm=4:nwc=5.0:sims=off:sp=reverse_weighted_frequency:stl=62_367 on theBenchmark for (367ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.42  % (24300)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.42  % (24300)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-24294"
% 0.21/0.42  % (24300)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.42  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.42  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.42  % (24300)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.42  % (24300)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.21/0.42  % (24300)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.42  
% 0.21/0.42  % (24300)Memory used [KB]: 1163
% 0.21/0.42  % (24300)Time elapsed: 0.022 s
% 0.21/0.42  % (24300)Instructions burned: 32 (million)
% 0.21/0.42  % (24294)Success in time 0.035 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------