TSTP Solution File: DAT095_1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : DAT095_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:37:09 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.93s 2.02s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   21
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (   9 unt;  16 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   26 (  11   ~;   8   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   1  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   50 (   8 atm;   4 fun;  12 num;  26 var)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :   25 (  14   >;  11   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  13 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (;  47   !;   4   ?;  51   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ inRange > in > count > cons > append > #nlpp > tail > length > head > nil > #skF_4 > #skF_1 > #skF_2 > #skF_6 > #skF_3 > #skF_5

%Foreground sorts:
tff(list,type,
    list: $tType ).

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(inRange,type,
    inRange: ( $int * list ) > $o ).

tff(tail,type,
    tail: list > list ).

tff(nil,type,
    nil: list ).

tff(head,type,
    head: list > $int ).

tff(length,type,
    length: list > $int ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $int * list ) > list ).

tff(append,type,
    append: ( list * list ) > list ).

tff(count,type,
    count: ( $int * list ) > $int ).

tff(cons,type,
    cons: ( $int * list ) > list ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $int * list ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $int * list ) > $int ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $int * list ) > list ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': ( $int * list ) > list ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $int * list ) > $int ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $int * list ) > $int ).

tff(f_93,axiom,
    ! [Na: $int,L: list] :
      ( in(Na,L)
    <=> $greater(count(Na,L),0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_8) ).

tff(f_101,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ! [Ma: $int,Na: $int,L: list,L1: list] :
          ( ( in(Na,L)
            & ( L1 = cons(Ma,L) ) )
         => ( count(Na,L1) = count(Na,L) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c) ).

tff(f_84,axiom,
    ! [Ka: $int,Ha: $int,T: list,Na: $int] :
      ( ( count(Ka,cons(Ha,T)) = $sum(count(Ka,T),1) )
     <= ( Ka = Ha ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_4) ).

tff(f_89,axiom,
    ! [Ia: $int,K: list,L: list] : ( append(cons(Ia,K),L) = cons(Ia,append(K,L)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l_7) ).

tff(f_54,axiom,
    ! [Xa: $int,L: list] :
      ( in(Xa,L)
    <=> ( ? [Ha: $int,T: list] :
            ( ( L = cons(Ha,T) )
            & ( Xa = Ha ) )
        | ? [Ha: $int,T: list] :
            ( ( L = cons(Ha,T) )
            & in(Xa,T) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',in_conv) ).

tff(c_53,plain,
    ! [N_45a: $int,L_46: list] :
      ( in(N_45a,L_46)
      | ~ $greater(count(N_45a,L_46),0) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_93]) ).

tff(c_141,plain,
    ! [N_68a: $int,L_69: list] :
      ( in(N_68a,L_69)
      | ~ $less(0,count(N_68a,L_69)) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_53]) ).

tff(c_57,plain,
    ! [N_48a: $int,M_47a: $int,L_49: list] :
      ( ( count(N_48a,cons(M_47a,L_49)) = count(N_48a,L_49) )
      | ~ in(N_48a,L_49) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_101]) ).

tff(c_503,plain,
    ! [N_109a: $int,M_110a: $int,L_111: list] :
      ( ( count(N_109a,cons(M_110a,L_111)) = count(N_109a,L_111) )
      | ~ $less(0,count(N_109a,L_111)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_141,c_57]) ).

tff(c_43,plain,
    ! [H_38a: $int,T_39: list] : ( count(H_38a,cons(H_38a,T_39)) = $sum(count(H_38a,T_39),1) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_84]) ).

tff(c_61,plain,
    ! [H_38a: $int,T_39: list] : ( count(H_38a,cons(H_38a,T_39)) = $sum(1,count(H_38a,T_39)) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_43]) ).

tff(c_512,plain,
    ! [M_110a: $int,L_111: list] :
      ( ( $sum(1,count(M_110a,L_111)) = count(M_110a,L_111) )
      | ~ $less(0,count(M_110a,L_111)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_503,c_61]) ).

tff(c_536,plain,
    ! [M_110a: $int,L_111: list] : ~ $less(0,count(M_110a,L_111)),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_512]) ).

tff(c_50,plain,
    ! [N_45a: $int,L_46: list] :
      ( $greater(count(N_45a,L_46),0)
      | ~ in(N_45a,L_46) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_93]) ).

tff(c_59,plain,
    ! [N_45a: $int,L_46: list] :
      ( $less(0,count(N_45a,L_46))
      | ~ in(N_45a,L_46) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_50]) ).

tff(c_549,plain,
    ! [N_45a: $int,L_46: list] : ~ in(N_45a,L_46),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_536,c_59]) ).

tff(c_264,plain,
    ! [I_89a: $int,K_90: list,L_91: list] : ( cons(I_89a,append(K_90,L_91)) = append(cons(I_89a,K_90),L_91) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_89]) ).

tff(c_72,plain,
    ! [H_18a: $int,T_19: list] : in(H_18a,cons(H_18a,T_19)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_54]) ).

tff(c_309,plain,
    ! [I_89a: $int,K_90: list,L_91: list] : in(I_89a,append(cons(I_89a,K_90),L_91)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_264,c_72]) ).

tff(c_564,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_549,c_309]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : DAT095_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:29:23 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.93/2.02  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.93/2.02  
% 3.93/2.02  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.08/2.05  
% 4.08/2.05  Inference rules
% 4.08/2.05  ----------------------
% 4.08/2.05  #Ref     : 0
% 4.08/2.05  #Sup     : 100
% 4.08/2.05  #Fact    : 0
% 4.08/2.05  #Define  : 0
% 4.08/2.05  #Split   : 0
% 4.08/2.05  #Chain   : 0
% 4.08/2.05  #Close   : 0
% 4.08/2.05  
% 4.08/2.05  Ordering : LPO
% 4.08/2.05  
% 4.08/2.05  Simplification rules
% 4.08/2.05  ----------------------
% 4.08/2.05  #Subsume      : 8
% 4.08/2.05  #Demod        : 17
% 4.08/2.05  #Tautology    : 54
% 4.08/2.05  #SimpNegUnit  : 8
% 4.08/2.05  #BackRed      : 5
% 4.08/2.05  
% 4.08/2.05  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.08/2.05  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.08/2.05  
% 4.08/2.05  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.08/2.05  ----------------------
% 4.08/2.05  Preprocessing        : 0.62
% 4.08/2.05  Parsing              : 0.33
% 4.08/2.05  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 4.08/2.05  Main loop            : 0.34
% 4.09/2.05  Inferencing          : 0.13
% 4.09/2.05  Reduction            : 0.10
% 4.09/2.05  Demodulation         : 0.07
% 4.09/2.05  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 4.09/2.05  Subsumption          : 0.06
% 4.09/2.05  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 4.09/2.05  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.09/2.05  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.09/2.06  Total                : 1.00
% 4.09/2.06  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.09/2.06  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.09/2.06  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.09/2.06  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------