TSTP Solution File: DAT088_1 by SPASS+T---2.2.22

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS+T---2.2.22
% Problem  : DAT088_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 01:32:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.43s 1.07s
% Output   : Refutation 0.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : DAT088_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jul  1 20:46:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.46  % Using integer theory
% 0.43/1.07  
% 0.43/1.07  
% 0.43/1.07  % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_1801_n027.cluster.edu
% 0.43/1.07  
% 0.43/1.07  SPASS V 2.2.22  in combination with yices.
% 0.43/1.07  SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS.
% 0.43/1.07  Problem: /tmp/SPASST_1801_n027.cluster.edu 
% 0.43/1.07  SPASS derived 70 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses and kept 98 clauses.
% 0.43/1.07  SPASS backtracked 1 times (0 times due to theory inconsistency).
% 0.43/1.07  SPASS allocated 6496 KBytes.
% 0.43/1.07  SPASS spent	0:00:00.03 on the problem.
% 0.43/1.07  		0:00:00.00 for the input.
% 0.43/1.07  		0:00:00.01 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.43/1.07  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.43/1.07  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.43/1.07  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.43/1.07  		0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure.
% 0.43/1.07  		
% 0.43/1.07  
% 0.43/1.07  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_1801_n027.cluster.edu
% 0.43/1.07  
% 0.43/1.07  % Here is a proof with depth 1, length 13 :
% 0.43/1.07  4[0:Inp] ||  -> list(nil)*.
% 0.43/1.07  9[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(count(U,nil),0)**.
% 0.43/1.07  13[0:Inp] || list(U) -> list(cons(V,U))*.
% 0.43/1.07  15[0:Inp] || list(U) equal(cons(V,U),nil)** -> .
% 0.43/1.07  16[0:Inp] || list(U) -> equal(tail(cons(V,U)),U)**.
% 0.43/1.07  24[0:Inp] || list(U) -> equal(count(V,cons(V,U)),plus(count(V,U),1))**.
% 0.43/1.07  26[0:Inp] || list(U) -> equal(U,nil) equal(count(V,tail(U)),count(V,U))**.
% 0.43/1.07  160[0:SpR:16.1,26.2] || list(U) list(cons(V,U)) -> equal(cons(V,U),nil) equal(count(W,cons(V,U)),count(W,U))**.
% 0.43/1.07  163(e)[0:MRR:160.1,160.2,13.1,15.1] || list(U) -> equal(count(V,cons(W,U)),count(V,U))**.
% 0.43/1.07  164[0:Rew:163.1,24.1] || list(U) -> equal(plus(count(V,U),1),count(V,U))**.
% 0.43/1.07  174[0:SpR:9.0,164.1] || list(nil)* -> equal(plus(0,1),0).
% 0.43/1.07  176[0:ArS:174.1] || list(nil)* -> .
% 0.43/1.07  177(e)[0:MRR:176.0,4.0] ||  -> .
% 0.43/1.07  
% 0.43/1.07  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_1801_n027.cluster.edu
% 0.43/1.07  
% 0.43/1.07  Formulae used in the proof : fof_head_type fof_in_conv fof_nil_type fof_tail_type fof_l_6 fof_l4 fof_l3 fof_inRange fof_t_5
% 0.83/1.09  
% 0.83/1.09  SPASS+T ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------