TSTP Solution File: DAT085_1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : DAT085_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 01:27:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.47s 0.69s
% Output : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named 'CODE-FOR-$$SUM')
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(1,axiom,
! [X: $int,Y: list] : ( head(cons(X,Y)) = X ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l1) ).
tff(4,axiom,
! [X: $int,Y: list] : ( cons(X,Y) != nil ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l4) ).
tff(29,axiom,
length(nil) = 0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l) ).
tff(30,axiom,
! [X: $int,Y: list] : ( length(cons(X,Y)) = $sum(1,length(Y)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l_1) ).
tff(39,negated_conjecture,
! [X: list,Y: list] :
( ( length(X) != length(Y) )
| ( X = Y ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c) ).
tff(42,plain,
! [X: list] : ( length(X) != -1 ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[39,4]),'CODE-FOR-$$SUM',29,30,theory(equality)]) ).
tff(44,plain,
! [X: list,Y: list,Z: $int] :
( ( length(X) != $sum(1,length(Y)) )
| ( X = cons(Z,Y) ) ),
inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[39,30,theory(equality)]) ).
tff(75,plain,
! [X: list] : ( length(X) != -2 ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[42,30,theory(equality)]),'CODE-FOR-$$SUM',theory(equality)]) ).
tff(86,plain,
! [X: list] : ( length(X) != -3 ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[75,30,theory(equality)]),'CODE-FOR-$$SUM',theory(equality)]) ).
tff(89,plain,
! [X: list] : ( length(X) != -4 ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[86,30,theory(equality)]),'CODE-FOR-$$SUM',theory(equality)]) ).
tff(92,plain,
! [X: list] : ( length(X) != -5 ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[89,30,theory(equality)]),'CODE-FOR-$$SUM',theory(equality)]) ).
tff(100,plain,
! [X: list] : ( length(X) != -6 ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[92,30,theory(equality)]),'CODE-FOR-$$SUM',theory(equality)]) ).
tff(126,plain,
! [X: list] : ( length(X) != -7 ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[100,30,theory(equality)]),'CODE-FOR-$$SUM',theory(equality)]) ).
tff(146,plain,
! [X: list] : ( length(X) != -8 ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[126,30,theory(equality)]),'CODE-FOR-$$SUM',theory(equality)]) ).
tff(159,plain,
! [X: list] : ( length(X) != -9 ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[146,30,theory(equality)]),'CODE-FOR-$$SUM',theory(equality)]) ).
tff(176,plain,
! [X: list] : ( length(X) != -10 ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[159,30,theory(equality)]),'CODE-FOR-$$SUM',theory(equality)]) ).
tff(210,plain,
! [X: list] : ( length(X) != -11 ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[176,30,theory(equality)]),'CODE-FOR-$$SUM',theory(equality)]) ).
tff(284,plain,
! [X: list] : ( length(X) != -12 ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[210,30,theory(equality)]),'CODE-FOR-$$SUM',theory(equality)]) ).
tff(299,plain,
! [X: $int,Y: list,Z: $int] : ( cons(X,Y) = cons(Z,Y) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[44,30]) ).
tff(305,plain,
! [X: $int,Y: $int] : ( X = Y ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[1,299,theory(equality)]),1,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(306,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[284,305,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : DAT085_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jul 1 17:17:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.48 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 "."
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-01T17:17:14
% 0.20/0.48 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n013.cluster.edu at 2022-07-01T17:17:14
% 0.47/0.69
% 0.47/0.69
% 0.47/0.69 #||
% 0.47/0.69 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.69 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.47/0.69 ||#
% 0.47/0.69
% 0.47/0.69 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.47/0.69 ; 1648 formulas have been input or derived (from 110 formulas).
% 0.47/0.69 ; 306 (19%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.47/0.69 ; 163 (53%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.47/0.69 ; 143 (47%) are still being kept.
% 0.47/0.69 ;
% 0.47/0.69 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.005 2% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.002 1% Assert (15 calls)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.034 16% Process new row (1,259 calls)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.031 14% Resolution (218 calls)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.005 2% Paramodulation (109 calls)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (21 calls)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.006 3% Condensing (320 calls)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.016 7% Forward subsumption (320 calls)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.003 1% Backward subsumption (168 calls)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.004 2% Clause clause subsumption (357 calls)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.055 26% Forward simplification (1,160 calls)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.008 4% Backward simplification (305 calls)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.016 7% Ordering (4,629 calls)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.001 0% Sortal reasoning (4,280 calls)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.028 13% Other
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.214 Total
% 0.47/0.70 ; 0.223 Real time
% 0.47/0.70 ;
% 0.47/0.70 ; Term-hash-array has 688 terms in all.
% 0.47/0.70 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 93 entries (151 at peak, 168 added, 75 deleted).
% 0.47/0.70 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 768 nodes (1,162 at peak, 1,314 added, 546 deleted).
% 0.47/0.70 ; Retrieved 620 possibly forward subsuming rows in 320 calls.
% 0.47/0.70 ; Retrieved 35 possibly backward subsumed rows in 168 calls.
% 0.47/0.70 ; Path-index has 353 entries (632 at peak, 738 added, 385 deleted).
% 0.47/0.70 ; Path-index has 1,902 nodes (2,200 at peak, 2,379 added, 477 deleted).
% 0.47/0.70 ; Trie-index has 353 entries (632 at peak, 738 added, 385 deleted).
% 0.47/0.70 ; Trie-index has 1,475 nodes (2,336 at peak, 2,759 added, 1,284 deleted).
% 0.47/0.70 ; Retrieved 5,875 generalization terms in 7,232 calls.
% 0.47/0.70 ; Retrieved 368 instance terms in 148 calls.
% 0.47/0.70 ; Retrieved 8,676 unifiable terms in 1,066 calls.
% 0.47/0.70 ;
% 0.47/0.70 ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 9 entries:
% 0.47/0.70 ; 9 with value 0
% 0.47/0.70 ; The agenda of rows to process has 235 entries:
% 0.47/0.70 ; 5 with value 12 32 with value 18 2 with value 28
% 0.47/0.70 ; 20 with value 13 12 with value 19 4 with value 29
% 0.47/0.70 ; 28 with value 14 6 with value 20 2 with value 31
% 0.47/0.70 ; 32 with value 15 6 with value 21 2 with value 32
% 0.47/0.70 ; 28 with value 16 8 with value 25 2 with value 35
% 0.47/0.70 ; 38 with value 17 4 with value 26 4 with value 36
% 0.47/0.70 ; The agenda of rows to give has 80 entries:
% 0.47/0.70 ; 1 with value (4 7) 2 with value (4 28) 2 with value (4 44)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 1 with value (4 10) 1 with value (4 29) 2 with value (4 45)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 1 with value (4 17) 1 with value (4 30) 1 with value (4 46)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 6 with value (4 18) 7 with value (4 31) 1 with value (4 47)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 3 with value (4 19) 1 with value (4 33) 1 with value (4 53)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 6 with value (4 20) 2 with value (4 34) 1 with value (4 54)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 9 with value (4 21) 1 with value (4 35) 1 with value (4 56)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 4 with value (4 22) 1 with value (4 39) 2 with value (4 57)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 4 with value (4 23) 1 with value (4 40) 1 with value (4 61)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 3 with value (4 24) 2 with value (4 42) 1 with value (4 73)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 3 with value (4 26) 1 with value (4 43) 1 with value (4 77)
% 0.47/0.70 ; 5 with value (4 27)
% 0.47/0.70 Evaluation took:
% 0.47/0.70 0.223 seconds of real time
% 0.47/0.70 0.185062 seconds of user run time
% 0.47/0.70 0.037941 seconds of system run time
% 0.47/0.70 [Run times include 0.006 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.47/0.70 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.47/0.70 0 page faults and
% 0.47/0.70 12,603,448 bytes consed.
% 0.47/0.70 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.70 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-01T17:17:15
% 0.47/0.70 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.70 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------