TSTP Solution File: DAT067_1 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : DAT067_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:15:32 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 1.95s 1.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.95s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : DAT067_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 13:57:08 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.21/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.95/1.16 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.95/1.16 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 ------ iProver source info
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 1.95/1.16 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 1.95/1.16 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.95/1.16 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 ------ Parsing...
% 1.95/1.16 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.95/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 1.95/1.16 ------ Problem Properties
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 clauses 31
% 1.95/1.16 conjectures 2
% 1.95/1.16 EPR 7
% 1.95/1.16 Horn 26
% 1.95/1.16 unary 20
% 1.95/1.16 binary 7
% 1.95/1.16 lits 46
% 1.95/1.16 lits eq 25
% 1.95/1.16 fd_pure 0
% 1.95/1.16 fd_pseudo 0
% 1.95/1.16 fd_cond 0
% 1.95/1.16 fd_pseudo_cond 5
% 1.95/1.16 AC symbols 1
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 ------
% 1.95/1.16 Current options:
% 1.95/1.16 ------
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 tff(f3,axiom,(
% 1.95/1.16 ! [X2 : $int,X1 : heap,X0 : $int] : ($sum(1,length(X1)) != X0 => sel(app(X1,X2),X0) = sel(X1,X0))),
% 1.95/1.16 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_3)).
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 tff(f15,conjecture,(
% 1.95/1.16 ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : heap] : ($sum(1,length(X1)) = X0 | sel(app(X1,X2),X0) = sel(X1,X0))),
% 1.95/1.16 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',th_2)).
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 tff(f16,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.95/1.16 ~! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : heap] : ($sum(1,length(X1)) = X0 | sel(app(X1,X2),X0) = sel(X1,X0))),
% 1.95/1.16 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f15])).
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 tff(f30,plain,(
% 1.95/1.16 ! [X0 : $int,X1 : heap,X2 : $int] : ($sum(1,length(X1)) != X2 => sel(app(X1,X0),X2) = sel(X1,X2))),
% 1.95/1.16 inference(rectify,[],[f3])).
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 tff(f41,plain,(
% 1.95/1.16 ~! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int,X2 : heap] : ($sum(1,length(X2)) = X1 | sel(app(X2,X0),X1) = sel(X2,X1))),
% 1.95/1.16 inference(rectify,[],[f16])).
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 tff(f43,plain,(
% 1.95/1.16 ! [X0 : $int,X1 : heap,X2 : $int] : (sel(app(X1,X0),X2) = sel(X1,X2) | $sum(1,length(X1)) = X2)),
% 1.95/1.16 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f30])).
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 tff(f46,plain,(
% 1.95/1.16 ? [X0 : $int,X1 : $int,X2 : heap] : ($sum(1,length(X2)) != X1 & sel(app(X2,X0),X1) != sel(X2,X1))),
% 1.95/1.16 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f41])).
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 tff(f51,plain,(
% 1.95/1.16 ? [X0 : $int,X1 : $int,X2 : heap] : ($sum(1,length(X2)) != X1 & sel(app(X2,X0),X1) != sel(X2,X1)) => (sK1 != $sum(1,length(sK2)) & sel(app(sK2,sK0),sK1) != sel(sK2,sK1))),
% 1.95/1.16 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 tff(f52,plain,(
% 1.95/1.16 sK1 != $sum(1,length(sK2)) & sel(app(sK2,sK0),sK1) != sel(sK2,sK1)),
% 1.95/1.16 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f46,f51])).
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 tff(f55,plain,(
% 1.95/1.16 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : heap] : (sel(app(X1,X0),X2) = sel(X1,X2) | $sum(1,length(X1)) = X2) )),
% 1.95/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f43])).
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 tff(f71,plain,(
% 1.95/1.16 sel(app(sK2,sK0),sK1) != sel(sK2,sK1)),
% 1.95/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52])).
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 tff(f72,plain,(
% 1.95/1.16 sK1 != $sum(1,length(sK2))),
% 1.95/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52])).
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 cnf(c_63,plain,
% 1.95/1.16 (sel(app(X0_13,X0_3),X1_3) = sel(X0_13,X1_3)|$sum_int(1,length(X0_13)) = X1_3),
% 1.95/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f55])).
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 cnf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
% 1.95/1.16 ($sum_int(1,length(sK2)) != sK1),
% 1.95/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f72])).
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 cnf(c_79,negated_conjecture,
% 1.95/1.16 (sel(app(sK2,sK0),sK1) != sel(sK2,sK1)),
% 1.95/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f71])).
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 cnf(c_1497,plain,
% 1.95/1.16 (sel(app(sK2,sK0),sK1) = sel(sK2,sK1)|$sum_int(1,length(sK2)) = sK1),
% 1.95/1.16 inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_63])).
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 cnf(c_1498,plain,
% 1.95/1.16 ($false),
% 1.95/1.16 inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1497,c_79,c_78])).
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 1.95/1.16
% 1.95/1.16
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------