TSTP Solution File: DAT059_1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : DAT059_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:04:46 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 12 unt; 11 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 9 ( 8 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number arithmetic : 10 ( 0 atm; 0 fun; 0 num; 10 var)
% Number of types : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 ari)
% Number of type conns : 7 ( 3 >; 4 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 28 !; 12 ?; 40 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
data: $tType ).
tff(type_def_6,type,
array: $tType ).
tff(func_def_0,type,
mkarray: array ).
tff(func_def_1,type,
none: data ).
tff(func_def_2,type,
put: ( array * $int * data ) > array ).
tff(func_def_3,type,
get: ( array * $int ) > data ).
tff(func_def_4,type,
sK0: ( array * array ) > $int ).
tff(func_def_5,type,
sK1: data ).
tff(func_def_6,type,
sK2: data ).
tff(func_def_7,type,
sK3: array ).
tff(func_def_8,type,
sK4: $int ).
tff(f33,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f28,f25]) ).
tff(f25,plain,
! [X2: data,X3: array,X0: $int,X1: data] : ( put(put(X3,X0,X1),X0,X2) = put(X3,X0,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
tff(f15,plain,
! [X0: $int,X1: data,X2: data,X3: array] : ( put(put(X3,X0,X1),X0,X2) = put(X3,X0,X2) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f11]) ).
tff(f11,plain,
! [X3: $int,X1: data,X0: data,X2: array] : ( put(put(X2,X3,X1),X3,X0) = put(X2,X3,X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).
tff(f4,axiom,
! [X5: data,X4: data,X1: array,X0: $int] : ( put(put(X1,X0,X4),X0,X5) = put(X1,X0,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_20) ).
tff(f28,plain,
put(sK3,sK4,sK2) != put(put(sK3,sK4,sK1),sK4,sK2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).
tff(f22,plain,
put(sK3,sK4,sK2) != put(put(sK3,sK4,sK1),sK4,sK2),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4])],[f20,f21]) ).
tff(f21,plain,
( ? [X0: data,X1: data,X2: array,X3: $int] : ( put(X2,X3,X1) != put(put(X2,X3,X0),X3,X1) )
=> ( put(sK3,sK4,sK2) != put(put(sK3,sK4,sK1),sK4,sK2) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
tff(f20,plain,
? [X0: data,X1: data,X2: array,X3: $int] : ( put(X2,X3,X1) != put(put(X2,X3,X0),X3,X1) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f13]) ).
tff(f13,plain,
? [X3: data,X1: data,X0: array,X2: $int] : ( put(put(X0,X2,X3),X2,X1) != put(X0,X2,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
tff(f12,plain,
~ ! [X3: data,X1: data,X2: $int,X0: array] : ( put(put(X0,X2,X3),X2,X1) = put(X0,X2,X1) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).
tff(f7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: array,X4: data,X0: $int,X5: data] : ( put(X1,X0,X4) = put(put(X1,X0,X5),X0,X4) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f6]) ).
tff(f6,conjecture,
! [X1: array,X4: data,X0: $int,X5: data] : ( put(X1,X0,X4) = put(put(X1,X0,X5),X0,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',th_lem_5) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : DAT059=1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 21:37:55 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.50 % (18028)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/48Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (18051)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=177:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/177Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (18053)ott+10_7:2_awrs=decay:awrsf=8:bd=preordered:drc=off:fd=preordered:fde=unused:fsr=off:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsqr=5,8:sp=const_min:spb=units:to=lpo:i=355:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/355Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (18026)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (18028)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.51 % (18028)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.51 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.51 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51 % (18028)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (18028)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.51 % (18028)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.51 % (18028)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 % (18028)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.20/0.51 % (18028)Time elapsed: 0.107 s
% 0.20/0.51 % (18028)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.51 % (18028)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (18028)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (18019)Success in time 0.155 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------