TSTP Solution File: DAT034_1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : DAT034_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:37:00 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 6.48s 2.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   53 (  24 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (  32 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  19   ~;  15   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   87 (  15 atm;  23 fun;  28 num;  21 var)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   4   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (;  44   !;   0   ?;  44   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ in > remove > add > #nlpp > count > empty > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:
tff(collection,type,
    collection: $tType ).

%Background operators:
tff('#skE_2',type,
    '#skE_2': $int ).

tff('#skE_1',type,
    '#skE_1': $int ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $int ).

%Foreground operators:
tff(empty,type,
    empty: collection ).

tff(count,type,
    count: collection > $int ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': collection ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $int * collection ) > $o ).

tff(remove,type,
    remove: ( $int * collection ) > collection ).

tff(add,type,
    add: ( $int * collection ) > collection ).

tff(f_140,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U: collection,Va: $int] : $greatereq($sum(count(U),1),count(add(Va,U))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

tff(f_122,axiom,
    ! [X10a: $int,X11: collection] :
      ( in(X10a,X11)
    <=> ( count(add(X10a,X11)) = count(X11) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/DAT002=1.ax',ax4) ).

tff(f_135,axiom,
    ! [X16a: $int,X17: collection] :
      ( in(X16a,X17)
     => ( X17 = add(X16a,remove(X16a,X17)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/DAT002=1.ax',ax7) ).

tff(f_71,axiom,
    ! [Za: $int,X1: collection,X2a: $int] :
      ( ( in(Za,X1)
        | ( Za = X2a ) )
    <=> in(Za,add(X2a,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/DAT002_0.ax',ax4) ).

tff(f_126,axiom,
    ! [X12a: $int,X13: collection] :
      ( in(X12a,X13)
    <=> ( count(remove(X12a,X13)) = $difference(count(X13),1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/DAT002=1.ax',ax5) ).

tff(f_109,axiom,
    ! [X6: collection] : $greatereq(count(X6),0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/DAT002=1.ax',ax1) ).

tff(f_118,axiom,
    ! [X8a: $int,X9: collection] :
      ( ~ in(X8a,X9)
    <=> ( count(add(X8a,X9)) = $sum(count(X9),1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/DAT002=1.ax',ax3) ).

tff(c_47,plain,
    ~ $greatereq($sum(count('#skF_1'),1),count(add('#skF_2','#skF_1'))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_140]) ).

tff(c_52,plain,
    $less($sum(1,count('#skF_1')),count(add('#skF_2','#skF_1'))),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_47]) ).

tff(c_125,plain,
    count('#skF_1') = '#skE_1',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_52]) ).

tff(c_128,plain,
    count(add('#skF_2','#skF_1')) = '#skE_2',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_52]) ).

tff(c_58,plain,
    ! [X10_16a: $int,X11_17: collection] :
      ( in(X10_16a,X11_17)
      | ( count(add(X10_16a,X11_17)) != count(X11_17) ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_122]) ).

tff(c_272,plain,
    ! [X16_54a: $int,X17_55: collection] :
      ( ( add(X16_54a,remove(X16_54a,X17_55)) = X17_55 )
      | ~ in(X16_54a,X17_55) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_135]) ).

tff(c_288,plain,
    ! [X10_16a: $int,X11_17: collection] :
      ( ( add(X10_16a,remove(X10_16a,X11_17)) = X11_17 )
      | ( count(add(X10_16a,X11_17)) != count(X11_17) ) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_272]) ).

tff(c_69,plain,
    ! [X2_8a: $int,X1_7: collection] : in(X2_8a,add(X2_8a,X1_7)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_71]) ).

tff(c_35,plain,
    ! [X12_18a: $int,X13_19: collection] :
      ( ( count(remove(X12_18a,X13_19)) = $difference(count(X13_19),1) )
      | ~ in(X12_18a,X13_19) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_126]) ).

tff(c_506,plain,
    ! [X12_76a: $int,X13_77: collection] :
      ( ( count(remove(X12_76a,X13_77)) = $sum($uminus(1),count(X13_77)) )
      | ~ in(X12_76a,X13_77) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_35]) ).

tff(c_1206,plain,
    ! [X2_105a: $int,X1_106: collection] : ( count(remove(X2_105a,add(X2_105a,X1_106))) = $sum($uminus(1),count(add(X2_105a,X1_106))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_506]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ! [X6_12: collection] : $greatereq(count(X6_12),0),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_109]) ).

tff(c_64,plain,
    ! [X6_12: collection] : ~ $less(count(X6_12),0),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_18]) ).

tff(c_1226,plain,
    ! [X2_105a: $int,X1_106: collection] : ~ $less($sum($uminus(1),count(add(X2_105a,X1_106))),0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1206,c_64]) ).

tff(c_1280,plain,
    ! [X2_107a: $int,X1_108: collection] : ~ $less(count(add(X2_107a,X1_108)),1),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_1226]) ).

tff(c_1519,plain,
    ! [X11_123: collection,X10_124a: $int] :
      ( ~ $less(count(X11_123),1)
      | ( count(add(X10_124a,X11_123)) != count(X11_123) ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_288,c_1280]) ).

tff(c_1540,plain,
    ( ~ $less(count('#skF_1'),1)
    | ( count('#skF_1') != '#skE_2' ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_128,c_1519]) ).

tff(c_1553,plain,
    ( ~ $less('#skE_1',1)
    | ( '#skE_2' != '#skE_1' ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_125,c_125,c_1540]) ).

tff(c_1555,plain,
    '#skE_2' != '#skE_1',
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_1553]) ).

tff(c_146,plain,
    count(add('#skF_2','#skF_1')) = '#skE_2',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_52]) ).

tff(c_25,plain,
    ! [X8_14a: $int,X9_15: collection] :
      ( ( count(add(X8_14a,X9_15)) = $sum(count(X9_15),1) )
      | in(X8_14a,X9_15) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_118]) ).

tff(c_459,plain,
    ! [X8_74a: $int,X9_75: collection] :
      ( ( count(add(X8_74a,X9_75)) = $sum(1,count(X9_75)) )
      | in(X8_74a,X9_75) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_25]) ).

tff(c_59,plain,
    ! [X10_16a: $int,X11_17: collection] :
      ( ( count(add(X10_16a,X11_17)) = count(X11_17) )
      | ~ in(X10_16a,X11_17) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_122]) ).

tff(c_4589,plain,
    ! [X8_230a: $int,X9_231: collection] :
      ( ( count(add(X8_230a,X9_231)) = count(X9_231) )
      | ( count(add(X8_230a,X9_231)) = $sum(1,count(X9_231)) ) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_459,c_59]) ).

tff(c_4654,plain,
    ( ( $sum(1,count('#skF_1')) = '#skE_2' )
    | ( count(add('#skF_2','#skF_1')) = count('#skF_1') ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4589,c_128]) ).

tff(c_4738,plain,
    ( ( '#skE_2' = $sum(1,'#skE_1') )
    | ( '#skE_2' = '#skE_1' ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_146,c_125,c_125,c_4654]) ).

tff(c_4740,plain,
    '#skE_2' = $sum(1,'#skE_1'),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_1555,c_4738]) ).

tff(c_121,plain,
    count(add('#skF_2','#skF_1')) = '#skE_2',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_52]) ).

tff(c_120,plain,
    count('#skF_1') = '#skE_1',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_52]) ).

tff(c_74,plain,
    $less($sum(1,count('#skF_1')),count(add('#skF_2','#skF_1'))),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_47]) ).

tff(c_129,plain,
    $less($sum(1,'#skE_1'),'#skE_2'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_121,c_120,c_74]) ).

tff(c_4793,plain,
    $less($sum(1,'#skE_1'),$sum(1,'#skE_1')),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4740,c_129]) ).

tff(c_4799,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_4793]) ).

tff(c_4803,plain,
    '#skE_2' = '#skE_1',
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_1553]) ).

tff(c_4811,plain,
    $less($sum(1,'#skE_1'),'#skE_1'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4803,c_129]) ).

tff(c_4818,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_4811]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : DAT034_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:30:08 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 6.48/2.71  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.48/2.72  
% 6.48/2.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.48/2.76  
% 6.48/2.76  Inference rules
% 6.48/2.76  ----------------------
% 6.48/2.76  #Ref     : 0
% 6.48/2.76  #Sup     : 951
% 6.48/2.76  #Fact    : 1
% 6.48/2.76  #Define  : 2
% 6.48/2.76  #Split   : 13
% 6.48/2.76  #Chain   : 0
% 6.48/2.76  #Close   : 0
% 6.48/2.76  
% 6.48/2.76  Ordering : LPO
% 6.48/2.76  
% 6.48/2.76  Simplification rules
% 6.48/2.76  ----------------------
% 6.48/2.76  #Subsume      : 243
% 6.48/2.76  #Demod        : 471
% 6.48/2.76  #Tautology    : 357
% 6.48/2.76  #SimpNegUnit  : 18
% 6.48/2.76  #BackRed      : 8
% 6.48/2.76  
% 6.48/2.76  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 6.48/2.76  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 6.48/2.76  
% 6.48/2.76  Timing (in seconds)
% 6.48/2.76  ----------------------
% 6.48/2.76  Preprocessing        : 0.60
% 6.48/2.76  Parsing              : 0.33
% 6.48/2.76  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 6.48/2.76  Main loop            : 1.06
% 6.48/2.76  Inferencing          : 0.31
% 6.48/2.76  Reduction            : 0.31
% 6.48/2.76  Demodulation         : 0.23
% 6.48/2.76  BG Simplification    : 0.11
% 6.48/2.76  Subsumption          : 0.23
% 6.48/2.76  Abstraction          : 0.05
% 6.48/2.76  MUC search           : 0.00
% 6.48/2.76  Cooper               : 0.02
% 6.48/2.76  Total                : 1.72
% 6.48/2.76  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 6.48/2.76  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 6.48/2.76  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 6.48/2.77  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------