TSTP Solution File: DAT017_1 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : DAT017_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:15:21 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.70s 1.02s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.70s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : DAT017_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 14:20:27 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.38 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.14/0.38 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.70/1.02 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.70/1.02 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 ------ iProver source info
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 3.70/1.02 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 3.70/1.02 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.70/1.02 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 ------ Parsing...
% 3.70/1.02 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.70/1.02 ------ Proving...
% 3.70/1.02 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 clauses 17
% 3.70/1.02 conjectures 3
% 3.70/1.02 EPR 4
% 3.70/1.02 Horn 14
% 3.70/1.02 unary 12
% 3.70/1.02 binary 3
% 3.70/1.02 lits 24
% 3.70/1.02 lits eq 13
% 3.70/1.02 fd_pure 0
% 3.70/1.02 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.70/1.02 fd_cond 0
% 3.70/1.02 fd_pseudo_cond 2
% 3.70/1.02 AC symbols 1
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 ------
% 3.70/1.02 Current options:
% 3.70/1.02 ------
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 ------ Proving...
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 tff(f1,axiom,(
% 3.70/1.02 ! [X0 : array,X1 : $int,X2 : $int] : read(write(X0,X1,X2),X1) = X2),
% 3.70/1.02 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1)).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 tff(f2,axiom,(
% 3.70/1.02 ! [X3 : array,X4 : $int,X5 : $int,X6 : $int] : (read(write(X3,X4,X6),X5) = read(X3,X5) | X4 = X5)),
% 3.70/1.02 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2)).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 tff(f3,conjecture,(
% 3.70/1.02 ! [X0 : array,X1 : array,X2 : $int,X3 : $int,X4 : $int] : ((write(write(write(X1,X3,0),X4,$sum(read(X1,X4),1)),X2,0) = X0 & read(X1,X2) != read(X1,X3)) => ? [X5 : $int] : read(X0,X5) != read(X1,X5))),
% 3.70/1.02 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1)).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 tff(f4,negated_conjecture,(
% 3.70/1.02 ~! [X0 : array,X1 : array,X2 : $int,X3 : $int,X4 : $int] : ((write(write(write(X1,X3,0),X4,$sum(read(X1,X4),1)),X2,0) = X0 & read(X1,X2) != read(X1,X3)) => ? [X5 : $int] : read(X0,X5) != read(X1,X5))),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 tff(f5,plain,(
% 3.70/1.02 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
% 3.70/1.02 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 tff(f6,plain,(
% 3.70/1.02 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 3.70/1.02 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 tff(f17,plain,(
% 3.70/1.02 ! [X0 : array,X1 : $int,X2 : $int,X3 : $int] : (read(write(X0,X1,X3),X2) = read(X0,X2) | X1 = X2)),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 tff(f18,plain,(
% 3.70/1.02 ? [X0 : array,X1 : array,X2 : $int,X3 : $int,X4 : $int] : (! [X5 : $int] : read(X0,X5) = read(X1,X5) & (write(write(write(X1,X3,0),X4,$sum(read(X1,X4),1)),X2,0) = X0 & read(X1,X2) != read(X1,X3)))),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 tff(f19,plain,(
% 3.70/1.02 ? [X0 : array,X1 : array,X2 : $int,X3 : $int,X4 : $int] : (! [X5 : $int] : read(X0,X5) = read(X1,X5) & write(write(write(X1,X3,0),X4,$sum(read(X1,X4),1)),X2,0) = X0 & read(X1,X2) != read(X1,X3))),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(flattening,[],[f18])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 tff(f20,plain,(
% 3.70/1.02 ? [X0 : array,X1 : array,X2 : $int,X3 : $int,X4 : $int] : (! [X5 : $int] : read(X0,X5) = read(X1,X5) & write(write(write(X1,X3,0),X4,$sum(read(X1,X4),1)),X2,0) = X0 & read(X1,X2) != read(X1,X3)) => (! [X5 : $int] : read(sK0,X5) = read(sK1,X5) & sK0 = write(write(write(sK1,sK3,0),sK4,$sum(read(sK1,sK4),1)),sK2,0) & read(sK1,sK2) != read(sK1,sK3))),
% 3.70/1.02 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 tff(f21,plain,(
% 3.70/1.02 ! [X5 : $int] : read(sK0,X5) = read(sK1,X5) & sK0 = write(write(write(sK1,sK3,0),sK4,$sum(read(sK1,sK4),1)),sK2,0) & read(sK1,sK2) != read(sK1,sK3)),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4])],[f19,f20])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 tff(f22,plain,(
% 3.70/1.02 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : array,X1 : $int] : (read(write(X0,X1,X2),X1) = X2) )),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 tff(f23,plain,(
% 3.70/1.02 ( ! [X2 : $int,X3 : $int,X0 : array,X1 : $int] : (read(write(X0,X1,X3),X2) = read(X0,X2) | X1 = X2) )),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 tff(f24,plain,(
% 3.70/1.02 read(sK1,sK2) != read(sK1,sK3)),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 tff(f25,plain,(
% 3.70/1.02 sK0 = write(write(write(sK1,sK3,0),sK4,$sum(read(sK1,sK4),1)),sK2,0)),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 tff(f26,plain,(
% 3.70/1.02 ( ! [X5 : $int] : (read(sK0,X5) = read(sK1,X5)) )),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_59,plain,
% 3.70/1.02 ($sum_int($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = $sum_int(X0_3,$sum_int(X1_3,X2_3))),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_60,plain,
% 3.70/1.02 ($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3) = $sum_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_61,plain,
% 3.70/1.02 (read(write(X0_13,X0_3,X1_3),X0_3) = X1_3),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_62,plain,
% 3.70/1.02 (read(write(X0_13,X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = read(X0_13,X2_3)|X0_3 = X2_3),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
% 3.70/1.02 (read(sK0,X0_3) = read(sK1,X0_3)),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
% 3.70/1.02 (write(write(write(sK1,sK3,0),sK4,$sum_int(read(sK1,sK4),1)),sK2,0) = sK0),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
% 3.70/1.02 (read(sK1,sK2) != read(sK1,sK3)),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_79,negated_conjecture,
% 3.70/1.02 (write(write(write(sK1,sK3,0),sK4,$sum_int(1,read(sK1,sK4))),sK2,0) = sK0),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_59,c_60])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_653,plain,
% 3.70/1.02 (read(sK0,sK2) = 0),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_79,c_61])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_694,plain,
% 3.70/1.02 (read(sK1,sK2) = 0),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_653,c_63])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_695,plain,
% 3.70/1.02 (read(sK1,sK3) != 0),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_694])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_1066,plain,
% 3.70/1.02 (read(write(write(sK1,sK3,0),sK4,$sum_int(1,read(sK1,sK4))),X0_3) = read(sK0,X0_3)|
% 3.70/1.02 X0_3 = sK2),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_79,c_62])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_1068,plain,
% 3.70/1.02 (read(write(write(sK1,sK3,0),sK4,$sum_int(1,read(sK1,sK4))),X0_3) = read(sK1,X0_3)|
% 3.70/1.02 X0_3 = sK2),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1066,c_63])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_1190,plain,
% 3.70/1.02 ($sum_int(1,read(sK1,sK4)) = read(sK1,sK4)|sK2 = sK4),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1068,c_61])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_1191,plain,
% 3.70/1.02 (read(write(sK1,sK3,0),X0_3) = read(sK1,X0_3)|X0_3 = sK2|X0_3 = sK4),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1068,c_62])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_1198,plain,
% 3.70/1.02 (sK2 = sK4),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1190])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_1208,plain,
% 3.70/1.02 (read(write(sK1,sK3,0),X0_3) = read(sK1,X0_3)|X0_3 = sK2),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1191,c_1198])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_1213,plain,
% 3.70/1.02 (read(sK1,sK3) = 0|sK2 = sK3),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_1208])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_1215,plain,
% 3.70/1.02 (sK2 = sK3),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1213,c_695])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_1217,plain,
% 3.70/1.02 (read(sK1,sK2) != 0),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_695,c_1215])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 cnf(c_1218,plain,
% 3.70/1.02 ($false),
% 3.70/1.02 inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1217,c_694])).
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 3.70/1.02
% 3.70/1.02
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------