TSTP Solution File: DAT012_1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : DAT012_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:36:57 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.28s 1.81s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   62 (  33 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   89 (  39 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   53 (  16   ~;  31   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :  177 (  46 atm;  49 fun;  62 num;  20 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   2   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (   9 usr;  10 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (;  26   !;   0   ?;  26   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ write > read > #nlpp > #skF_1 > #skF_2

%Foreground sorts:
tff(array,type,
    array: $tType ).

%Background operators:
tff('#skE_2',type,
    '#skE_2': $int ).

tff('#skE_1',type,
    '#skE_1': $int ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $int ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $int ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $int ).

%Foreground operators:
tff(write,type,
    write: ( array * $int * $int ) > array ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': array ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': array ).

tff(read,type,
    read: ( array * $int ) > $int ).

tff(f_82,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U: array,V: array,Wa: $int,Xa: $int] :
        ( ( ! [Ya: $int] :
              ( ( $lesseq(Wa,Ya)
                & $lesseq(Ya,Xa) )
             => $greater(read(U,Ya),0) )
          & ( V = write(U,$sum(Wa,2),$sum(read(U,$sum(Wa,1)),1)) ) )
       => ! [Za: $int] :
            ( ( $lesseq(Wa,Za)
              & $lesseq(Za,Xa) )
           => $greater(read(V,Za),0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

tff(f_59,axiom,
    ! [U: array,Va: $int,Wa: $int] : ( read(write(U,Va,Wa),Va) = Wa ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/DAT001_0.ax',ax1) ).

tff(f_63,axiom,
    ! [X: array,Ya: $int,Za: $int,X1a: $int] :
      ( ( Ya = Za )
      | ( read(write(X,Ya,X1a),Za) = read(X,Za) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/DAT001_0.ax',ax2) ).

tff(c_19,plain,
    write('#skF_1',$sum(2,'#skF_3'),$sum(1,read('#skF_1',$sum(1,'#skF_3')))) = '#skF_2',
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_82]) ).

tff(c_89,plain,
    read('#skF_1',$sum(1,'#skF_3')) = '#skE_2',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_19]) ).

tff(c_29,plain,
    write('#skF_1',$sum(2,'#skF_3'),$sum(1,read('#skF_1',$sum(1,'#skF_3')))) = '#skF_2',
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_82]) ).

tff(c_330,plain,
    write('#skF_1',$sum(2,'#skF_3'),$sum(1,'#skE_2')) = '#skF_2',
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_89,c_29]) ).

tff(c_27,plain,
    ! [U_1: array,V_2a: $int,W_3a: $int] : ( read(write(U_1,V_2a,W_3a),V_2a) = W_3a ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_356,plain,
    read('#skF_2',$sum(2,'#skF_3')) = $sum(1,'#skE_2'),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_330,c_27]) ).

tff(c_5,plain,
    ~ $greater(read('#skF_2','#skF_5'),0),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_82]) ).

tff(c_25,plain,
    ~ $less(0,read('#skF_2','#skF_5')),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_5]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    read('#skF_2','#skF_5') = '#skE_1',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_25]) ).

tff(c_372,plain,
    ( ( $sum(1,'#skE_2') = '#skE_1' )
    | ( '#skF_5' != $sum(2,'#skF_3') ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_356,c_38]) ).

tff(c_374,plain,
    ( ( '#skE_2' = $sum($uminus(1),'#skE_1') )
    | ( '#skF_5' != $sum(2,'#skF_3') ) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_372]) ).

tff(c_382,plain,
    '#skF_5' != $sum(2,'#skF_3'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_374]) ).

tff(c_7,plain,
    $lesseq('#skF_5','#skF_4'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_82]) ).

tff(c_21,plain,
    ~ $less('#skF_4','#skF_5'),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_7]) ).

tff(c_9,plain,
    $lesseq('#skF_3','#skF_5'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_82]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ~ $less('#skF_5','#skF_3'),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_9]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    read('#skF_2','#skF_5') = '#skE_1',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_25]) ).

tff(c_31,plain,
    ~ $less(0,read('#skF_2','#skF_5')),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_5]) ).

tff(c_39,plain,
    ~ $less(0,'#skE_1'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_32,c_31]) ).

tff(c_26,plain,
    ! [X_4: array,Y_5a: $int,X1_7a: $int,Z_6a: $int] :
      ( ( read(write(X_4,Y_5a,X1_7a),Z_6a) = read(X_4,Z_6a) )
      | ( Z_6a = Y_5a ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).

tff(c_383,plain,
    ! [Z_66a: $int] :
      ( ( read('#skF_1',Z_66a) = read('#skF_2',Z_66a) )
      | ( Z_66a = $sum(2,'#skF_3') ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_330,c_26]) ).

tff(c_13,plain,
    ! [Y_10a: $int] :
      ( $greater(read('#skF_1',Y_10a),0)
      | ~ $lesseq('#skF_3',Y_10a)
      | ~ $lesseq(Y_10a,'#skF_4') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_82]) ).

tff(c_15,plain,
    ! [Y_10a: $int] :
      ( $less(0,read('#skF_1',Y_10a))
      | $less(Y_10a,'#skF_3')
      | $less('#skF_4',Y_10a) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_13]) ).

tff(c_451,plain,
    ! [Z_70a: $int] :
      ( $less(0,read('#skF_2',Z_70a))
      | $less(Z_70a,'#skF_3')
      | $less('#skF_4',Z_70a)
      | ( Z_70a = $sum(2,'#skF_3') ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_383,c_15]) ).

tff(c_460,plain,
    ( $less(0,'#skE_1')
    | $less('#skF_5','#skF_3')
    | $less('#skF_4','#skF_5')
    | ( '#skF_5' = $sum(2,'#skF_3') ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_38,c_451]) ).

tff(c_472,plain,
    ( $less('#skF_5','#skF_3')
    | $less('#skF_4','#skF_5')
    | ( '#skF_5' = $sum(2,'#skF_3') ) ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_39,c_460]) ).

tff(c_475,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_382,c_21,c_20,c_472]) ).

tff(c_478,plain,
    '#skE_2' = $sum($uminus(1),'#skE_1'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_374]) ).

tff(c_125,plain,
    write('#skF_1',$sum(2,'#skF_3'),$sum(1,'#skE_2')) = '#skF_2',
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_89,c_29]) ).

tff(c_205,plain,
    read('#skF_2',$sum(2,'#skF_3')) = $sum(1,'#skE_2'),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_125,c_27]) ).

tff(c_239,plain,
    ( ( $sum(1,'#skE_2') = '#skE_1' )
    | ( '#skF_5' != $sum(2,'#skF_3') ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_38,c_205]) ).

tff(c_241,plain,
    ( ( '#skE_2' = $sum($uminus(1),'#skE_1') )
    | ( '#skF_5' != $sum(2,'#skF_3') ) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_239]) ).

tff(c_268,plain,
    '#skF_5' != $sum(2,'#skF_3'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_241]) ).

tff(c_149,plain,
    ! [Z_38a: $int] :
      ( ( read('#skF_1',Z_38a) = read('#skF_2',Z_38a) )
      | ( Z_38a = $sum(2,'#skF_3') ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_125,c_26]) ).

tff(c_244,plain,
    ! [Z_43a: $int] :
      ( $less(0,read('#skF_2',Z_43a))
      | $less(Z_43a,'#skF_3')
      | $less('#skF_4',Z_43a)
      | ( Z_43a = $sum(2,'#skF_3') ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_149,c_15]) ).

tff(c_253,plain,
    ( $less(0,'#skE_1')
    | $less('#skF_5','#skF_3')
    | $less('#skF_4','#skF_5')
    | ( '#skF_5' = $sum(2,'#skF_3') ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_38,c_244]) ).

tff(c_264,plain,
    ( $less('#skF_5','#skF_3')
    | $less('#skF_4','#skF_5')
    | ( '#skF_5' = $sum(2,'#skF_3') ) ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_39,c_253]) ).

tff(c_269,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_268,c_21,c_20,c_264]) ).

tff(c_273,plain,
    '#skF_5' = $sum(2,'#skF_3'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_241]) ).

tff(c_290,plain,
    ~ $less('#skF_4',$sum(2,'#skF_3')),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_273,c_21]) ).

tff(c_102,plain,
    read('#skF_1',$sum(1,'#skF_3')) = '#skE_2',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_19]) ).

tff(c_115,plain,
    ( $less(0,'#skE_2')
    | $less($sum(1,'#skF_3'),'#skF_3')
    | $less('#skF_4',$sum(1,'#skF_3')) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_102,c_15]) ).

tff(c_117,plain,
    ( $less(0,'#skE_2')
    | $less('#skF_4',$sum(1,'#skF_3')) ),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_115]) ).

tff(c_122,plain,
    $less('#skF_4',$sum(1,'#skF_3')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_117]) ).

tff(c_325,plain,
    $false,
    inference(close,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_290,c_122]) ).

tff(c_328,plain,
    $less(0,'#skE_2'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_117]) ).

tff(c_506,plain,
    $less(0,$sum($uminus(1),'#skE_1')),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_478,c_328]) ).

tff(c_520,plain,
    $less(1,'#skE_1'),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_506]) ).

tff(c_539,plain,
    $false,
    inference(close,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_520,c_39]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : DAT012_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.31  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.31  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:16:51 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.28/1.81  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.28/1.81  
% 3.28/1.81  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.28/1.85  
% 3.28/1.85  Inference rules
% 3.28/1.85  ----------------------
% 3.28/1.85  #Ref     : 0
% 3.28/1.85  #Sup     : 58
% 3.28/1.85  #Fact    : 0
% 3.28/1.85  #Define  : 2
% 3.28/1.85  #Split   : 5
% 3.28/1.85  #Chain   : 0
% 3.28/1.85  #Close   : 2
% 3.28/1.85  
% 3.28/1.85  Ordering : LPO
% 3.28/1.85  
% 3.28/1.85  Simplification rules
% 3.28/1.85  ----------------------
% 3.28/1.85  #Subsume      : 4
% 3.28/1.85  #Demod        : 21
% 3.28/1.85  #Tautology    : 41
% 3.28/1.85  #SimpNegUnit  : 5
% 3.28/1.85  #BackRed      : 12
% 3.28/1.85  
% 3.28/1.85  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.28/1.85  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.28/1.85  
% 3.28/1.85  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.28/1.85  ----------------------
% 3.28/1.85  Preprocessing        : 0.53
% 3.28/1.85  Parsing              : 0.26
% 3.28/1.85  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.28/1.85  Main loop            : 0.39
% 3.28/1.85  Inferencing          : 0.09
% 3.28/1.85  Reduction            : 0.10
% 3.28/1.85  Demodulation         : 0.07
% 3.28/1.85  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 3.28/1.85  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 3.28/1.85  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.28/1.85  MUC search           : 0.01
% 3.28/1.85  Cooper               : 0.05
% 3.28/1.85  Total                : 0.97
% 3.28/1.85  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.28/1.85  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.28/1.85  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.28/1.85  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------