TSTP Solution File: DAT010_1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : DAT010_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:36:57 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.01s 1.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.01s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   49 (  28 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   67 (  53 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  14   ~;  23   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :  114 (  10 atm;   0 fun;  87 num;  17 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   2   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (   6 usr;  12 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (;  23   !;   0   ?;  23   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ write > read > #nlpp > #skF_1 > #skF_2

%Foreground sorts:
tff(array,type,
    array: $tType ).

%Background operators:
tff('#skE_1',type,
    '#skE_1': $int ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $int ).

%Foreground operators:
tff(write,type,
    write: ( array * $int * $int ) > array ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': array ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': array ).

tff(read,type,
    read: ( array * $int ) > $int ).

tff(f_74,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U: array,V: array] :
        ( ( ( U = write(write(write(write(V,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) )
          & ! [Wa: $int] : $less(read(V,Wa),100) )
       => ! [Xa: $int] : $less(read(U,Xa),100) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

tff(f_59,axiom,
    ! [U: array,Va: $int,Wa: $int] : ( read(write(U,Va,Wa),Va) = Wa ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/DAT001_0.ax',ax1) ).

tff(f_63,axiom,
    ! [X: array,Ya: $int,Za: $int,X1a: $int] :
      ( ( Ya = Za )
      | ( read(write(X,Ya,X1a),Za) = read(X,Za) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/DAT001_0.ax',ax2) ).

tff(c_15,plain,
    ~ $less(read('#skF_1','#skF_3'),100),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_74]) ).

tff(c_54,plain,
    read('#skF_1','#skF_3') = '#skE_1',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_15]) ).

tff(c_19,plain,
    ~ $less(read('#skF_1','#skF_3'),100),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_74]) ).

tff(c_61,plain,
    ~ $less('#skE_1',100),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_54,c_19]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    write(write(write(write('#skF_2',3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = '#skF_1',
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_74]) ).

tff(c_17,plain,
    ! [U_1: array,V_2a: $int,W_3a: $int] : ( read(write(U_1,V_2a,W_3a),V_2a) = W_3a ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_87,plain,
    read('#skF_1',4) = 44,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_10,c_17]) ).

tff(c_60,plain,
    read('#skF_1','#skF_3') = '#skE_1',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_15]) ).

tff(c_99,plain,
    ( ( '#skE_1' = 44 )
    | ( '#skF_3' != 4 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_87,c_60]) ).

tff(c_104,plain,
    '#skF_3' != 4,
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_99]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [X_4: array,Y_5a: $int,X1_7a: $int,Z_6a: $int] :
      ( ( read(write(X_4,Y_5a,X1_7a),Z_6a) = read(X_4,Z_6a) )
      | ( Z_6a = Y_5a ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).

tff(c_105,plain,
    ! [Z_24a: $int] :
      ( ( read(write(write(write('#skF_2',3,33),4,444),5,55),Z_24a) = read('#skF_1',Z_24a) )
      | ( Z_24a = 4 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_10,c_16]) ).

tff(c_115,plain,
    ( ( read('#skF_1',5) = 55 )
    | ( 5 = 4 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_105,c_17]) ).

tff(c_131,plain,
    read('#skF_1',5) = 55,
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_115]) ).

tff(c_150,plain,
    ( ( '#skE_1' = 55 )
    | ( '#skF_3' != 5 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_60,c_131]) ).

tff(c_153,plain,
    '#skF_3' != 5,
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_150]) ).

tff(c_154,plain,
    ! [Z_25a: $int] :
      ( ( read(write(write('#skF_2',3,33),4,444),Z_25a) = read('#skF_1',Z_25a) )
      | ( Z_25a = 5 )
      | ( Z_25a = 4 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_105,c_16]) ).

tff(c_188,plain,
    ! [Z_26a: $int] :
      ( ( read(write('#skF_2',3,33),Z_26a) = read('#skF_1',Z_26a) )
      | ( Z_26a = 4 )
      | ( Z_26a = 5 )
      | ( Z_26a = 4 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_154,c_16]) ).

tff(c_198,plain,
    ( ( read('#skF_1',3) = 33 )
    | ( 4 = 3 )
    | ( 5 = 3 )
    | ( 4 = 3 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_188,c_17]) ).

tff(c_214,plain,
    read('#skF_1',3) = 33,
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_198]) ).

tff(c_230,plain,
    ( ( '#skE_1' = 33 )
    | ( '#skF_3' != 3 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_214,c_60]) ).

tff(c_236,plain,
    '#skF_3' != 3,
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_230]) ).

tff(c_237,plain,
    ! [Z_27a: $int] :
      ( ( read('#skF_1',Z_27a) = read('#skF_2',Z_27a) )
      | ( Z_27a = 3 )
      | ( Z_27a = 4 )
      | ( Z_27a = 5 )
      | ( Z_27a = 4 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_188,c_16]) ).

tff(c_278,plain,
    ( ( read('#skF_2','#skF_3') = '#skE_1' )
    | ( '#skF_3' = 3 )
    | ( '#skF_3' = 5 )
    | ( '#skF_3' = 4 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_237,c_60]) ).

tff(c_296,plain,
    read('#skF_2','#skF_3') = '#skE_1',
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_153,c_236,c_278]) ).

tff(c_11,plain,
    ! [W_10a: $int] : $less(read('#skF_2',W_10a),100),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_74]) ).

tff(c_301,plain,
    $less('#skE_1',100),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_296,c_11]) ).

tff(c_312,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_301]) ).

tff(c_316,plain,
    '#skF_3' = 3,
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_230]) ).

tff(c_233,plain,
    ( ( '#skE_1' = 33 )
    | ( '#skF_3' != 3 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_60,c_214]) ).

tff(c_325,plain,
    '#skE_1' = 33,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_316,c_233]) ).

tff(c_326,plain,
    ~ $less(33,100),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_325,c_61]) ).

tff(c_329,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_326]) ).

tff(c_332,plain,
    '#skE_1' = 55,
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_150]) ).

tff(c_339,plain,
    ~ $less(55,100),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_332,c_61]) ).

tff(c_342,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_339]) ).

tff(c_345,plain,
    '#skE_1' = 44,
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_99]) ).

tff(c_351,plain,
    ~ $less(44,100),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_345,c_61]) ).

tff(c_354,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_351]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : DAT010_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:12:19 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.01/1.76  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.01/1.76  
% 3.01/1.76  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.01/1.79  
% 3.01/1.79  Inference rules
% 3.01/1.79  ----------------------
% 3.01/1.79  #Ref     : 0
% 3.01/1.79  #Sup     : 55
% 3.01/1.79  #Fact    : 0
% 3.01/1.79  #Define  : 1
% 3.01/1.79  #Split   : 3
% 3.01/1.79  #Chain   : 0
% 3.01/1.79  #Close   : 0
% 3.01/1.79  
% 3.01/1.79  Ordering : LPO
% 3.01/1.79  
% 3.01/1.79  Simplification rules
% 3.01/1.79  ----------------------
% 3.01/1.79  #Subsume      : 5
% 3.01/1.79  #Demod        : 18
% 3.01/1.79  #Tautology    : 38
% 3.01/1.79  #SimpNegUnit  : 2
% 3.01/1.79  #BackRed      : 6
% 3.01/1.79  
% 3.01/1.79  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.01/1.79  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.01/1.79  
% 3.01/1.79  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.01/1.79  ----------------------
% 3.01/1.79  Preprocessing        : 0.48
% 3.01/1.79  Parsing              : 0.24
% 3.01/1.79  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.01/1.79  Main loop            : 0.28
% 3.01/1.79  Inferencing          : 0.09
% 3.01/1.79  Reduction            : 0.07
% 3.01/1.79  Demodulation         : 0.05
% 3.01/1.79  BG Simplification    : 0.04
% 3.01/1.79  Subsumption          : 0.04
% 3.01/1.79  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.01/1.79  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.01/1.79  Cooper               : 0.02
% 3.01/1.79  Total                : 0.81
% 3.01/1.79  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.01/1.79  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.01/1.79  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.01/1.79  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------