TSTP Solution File: DAT008_1 by SPASS+T---2.2.22
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS+T---2.2.22
% Problem : DAT008_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 01:31:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.46s 1.04s
% Output : Refutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : DAT008_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jul 1 17:02:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 % Using integer theory
% 0.46/1.04
% 0.46/1.04
% 0.46/1.04 % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_19966_n026.cluster.edu
% 0.46/1.04
% 0.46/1.04 SPASS V 2.2.22 in combination with yices.
% 0.46/1.04 SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS.
% 0.46/1.04 Problem: /tmp/SPASST_19966_n026.cluster.edu
% 0.46/1.04 SPASS derived 29 clauses, backtracked 8 clauses and kept 60 clauses.
% 0.46/1.04 SPASS backtracked 3 times (0 times due to theory inconsistency).
% 0.46/1.04 SPASS allocated 6257 KBytes.
% 0.46/1.04 SPASS spent 0:00:00.01 on the problem.
% 0.46/1.04 0:00:00.00 for the input.
% 0.46/1.04 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.46/1.04 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.46/1.04 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.46/1.04 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.46/1.04 0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure.
% 0.46/1.04
% 0.46/1.04
% 0.46/1.04 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_19966_n026.cluster.edu
% 0.46/1.04
% 0.46/1.04 % Here is a proof with depth 5, length 29 :
% 0.46/1.04 3[0:Inp] || -> array(skc3)*.
% 0.46/1.04 4[0:Inp] || -> greater(read(skc3,U),U)*.
% 0.46/1.04 5[0:Inp] || array(U) -> array(write(U,V,W))*.
% 0.46/1.04 7[0:Inp] || array(U) -> equal(read(write(U,V,W),V),W)**.
% 0.46/1.04 8[0:Inp] || greater(read(write(write(skc3,3,5),7,9),skc4),skc4)* -> .
% 0.46/1.04 9[0:Inp] || array(U) -> equal(V,W) equal(read(write(U,V,X),W),read(U,W))**.
% 0.46/1.04 41[0:ArS:4.0] || -> less(U,read(skc3,U))*.
% 0.46/1.04 42[0:ArS:8.0] || less(skc4,read(write(write(skc3,3,5),7,9),skc4))* -> .
% 0.46/1.04 43(e)[0:TOC:42.0] || -> lesseq(read(write(write(skc3,3,5),7,9),skc4),skc4)*.
% 0.46/1.04 44[0:Res:3.0,9.0] || -> equal(U,V) equal(read(write(skc3,U,W),V),read(skc3,V))**.
% 0.46/1.04 45[0:Res:3.0,7.0] || -> equal(read(write(skc3,U,V),U),V)**.
% 0.46/1.04 46[0:Res:3.0,5.0] || -> array(write(skc3,U,V))*.
% 0.46/1.04 62[0:SpR:9.2,43.0] || array(write(skc3,3,5)) -> equal(skc4,7) lesseq(read(write(skc3,3,5),skc4),skc4)*.
% 0.46/1.04 69(e)[0:MRR:62.0,46.0] || -> equal(skc4,7) lesseq(read(write(skc3,3,5),skc4),skc4)*.
% 0.46/1.04 71[1:Spt:69.0] || -> equal(skc4,7)**.
% 0.46/1.04 72[1:Rew:71.0,43.0] || -> lesseq(read(write(write(skc3,3,5),7,9),7),7)*.
% 0.46/1.04 75[1:SpR:7.1,72.0] || array(write(skc3,3,5))* -> lesseq(9,7).
% 0.46/1.04 77[1:ArS:75.1] || array(write(skc3,3,5))* -> .
% 0.46/1.04 78(e)[1:MRR:77.0,46.0] || -> .
% 0.46/1.04 80(e)[1:Spt:78.0,69.0,71.0] || equal(skc4,7)** -> .
% 0.46/1.04 81(e)[1:Spt:78.0,69.1] || -> lesseq(read(write(skc3,3,5),skc4),skc4)*.
% 0.46/1.04 82(e)[1:SpR:44.1,81.0] || -> equal(skc4,3) lesseq(read(skc3,skc4),skc4)*.
% 0.46/1.04 84(e)[2:Spt:82.0] || -> equal(skc4,3)**.
% 0.46/1.04 85[2:Rew:84.0,81.0] || -> lesseq(read(write(skc3,3,5),3),3)*.
% 0.46/1.04 89[2:Rew:45.0,85.0] || -> lesseq(5,3)*.
% 0.46/1.04 90(e)[2:ArS:89.0] || -> .
% 0.46/1.04 91(e)[2:Spt:90.0,82.0,84.0] || equal(skc4,3)** -> .
% 0.46/1.04 92[2:Spt:90.0,82.1] || -> lesseq(read(skc3,skc4),skc4)*.
% 0.46/1.04 93(e)[2:OCE:92.0,41.0] || -> .
% 0.46/1.04
% 0.46/1.04 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_19966_n026.cluster.edu
% 0.46/1.04
% 0.46/1.04 Formulae used in the proof : fof_array_type fof_co1 fof_ax1
% 0.46/1.06
% 0.46/1.07 SPASS+T ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------