TSTP Solution File: DAT003_1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : DAT003_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May 1 02:18:31 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.63s 0.78s
% Output : Refutation 0.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 6 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 33 ( 32 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 19 ( 3 ~; 13 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number arithmetic : 87 ( 0 atm; 0 fun; 70 num; 17 var)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 ari)
% Number of type conns : 5 ( 2 >; 3 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 4 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 26 !; 2 ?; 28 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
array: $tType ).
tff(func_def_0,type,
read: ( array * $int ) > $int ).
tff(func_def_1,type,
write: ( array * $int * $int ) > array ).
tff(func_def_9,type,
sK0: array ).
tff(func_def_10,type,
sK1: array ).
tff(f33,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f32,f8]) ).
tff(f8,plain,
33 != read(sK0,3),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
tff(f6,plain,
? [X0: array,X1: array] :
( ( 33 != read(X0,3) )
& ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X0 ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
tff(f4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0: array,X1: array] :
( ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X0 )
=> ( 33 = read(X0,3) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3]) ).
tff(f3,conjecture,
! [X0: array,X1: array] :
( ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X0 )
=> ( 33 = read(X0,3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.HgBcgDjiye/Vampire---4.8_27047',co1) ).
tff(f32,plain,
33 = read(sK0,3),
inference(evaluation,[],[f28]) ).
tff(f28,plain,
( ( 33 = read(sK0,3) )
| ( 3 = 4 )
| ( 3 = 5 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f26,f10]) ).
tff(f10,plain,
! [X2: $int,X0: array,X1: $int] : ( read(write(X0,X1,X2),X1) = X2 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tff(f1,axiom,
! [X0: array,X1: $int,X2: $int] : ( read(write(X0,X1,X2),X1) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.HgBcgDjiye/Vampire---4.8_27047',ax1) ).
tff(f26,plain,
! [X0: $int] :
( ( read(sK0,X0) = read(write(sK1,3,33),X0) )
| ( 4 = X0 )
| ( 5 = X0 ) ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f21]) ).
tff(f21,plain,
! [X0: $int] :
( ( read(sK0,X0) = read(write(sK1,3,33),X0) )
| ( 4 = X0 )
| ( 5 = X0 )
| ( 4 = X0 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f15,f9]) ).
tff(f9,plain,
! [X2: $int,X3: $int,X0: array,X1: $int] :
( ( read(write(X0,X1,X3),X2) = read(X0,X2) )
| ( X1 = X2 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
tff(f5,plain,
! [X0: array,X1: $int,X2: $int,X3: $int] :
( ( read(write(X0,X1,X3),X2) = read(X0,X2) )
| ( X1 = X2 ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
tff(f2,axiom,
! [X3: array,X4: $int,X5: $int,X6: $int] :
( ( read(write(X3,X4,X6),X5) = read(X3,X5) )
| ( X4 = X5 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.HgBcgDjiye/Vampire---4.8_27047',ax2) ).
tff(f15,plain,
! [X0: $int] :
( ( read(sK0,X0) = read(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,444),X0) )
| ( 4 = X0 )
| ( 5 = X0 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f14,f9]) ).
tff(f14,plain,
! [X0: $int] :
( ( read(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,444),5,55),X0) = read(sK0,X0) )
| ( 4 = X0 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f9,f7]) ).
tff(f7,plain,
sK0 = write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : DAT003_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 16:03:49 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.31 This is a TF0_THM_EQU_ARI problem
% 0.09/0.31 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.HgBcgDjiye/Vampire---4.8_27047
% 0.56/0.77 % (27160)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.56/0.77 % (27159)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.56/0.77 % (27162)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.56/0.77 % (27161)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.77 % (27157)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.77 % (27163)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.56/0.78 % (27164)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.56/0.78 % (27161)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (27161)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.78 % (27161)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.56/0.78 % (27161)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.78
% 0.56/0.78 % (27161)Memory used [KB]: 975
% 0.56/0.78 % (27161)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.56/0.78 % (27161)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.56/0.78 % (27161)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.78 % (27161)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.78 % (27157)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (27157)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.78 % (27157)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.56/0.78 % (27157)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.78
% 0.56/0.78 % (27164)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (27164)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.78 % (27164)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.56/0.78 % (27164)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.78
% 0.56/0.78 % (27164)Memory used [KB]: 960
% 0.56/0.78 % (27164)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.56/0.78 % (27164)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.56/0.78 % (27164)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.78 % (27164)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.78 % (27157)Memory used [KB]: 975
% 0.56/0.78 % (27157)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.56/0.78 % (27157)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.56/0.78 % (27157)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.78 % (27157)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.78 % (27158)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.56/0.78 % (27163)First to succeed.
% 0.63/0.78 % (27160)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (27160)------------------------------
% 0.63/0.78 % (27160)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.63/0.78 % (27160)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.63/0.78
% 0.63/0.78 % (27160)Memory used [KB]: 977
% 0.63/0.78 % (27160)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.63/0.78 % (27160)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.63/0.78 % (27160)------------------------------
% 0.63/0.78 % (27160)------------------------------
% 0.63/0.78 % (27159)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.63/0.78 % (27163)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.63/0.78 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.63/0.78 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.63/0.78 % (27163)------------------------------
% 0.63/0.78 % (27163)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.63/0.78 % (27163)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.63/0.78
% 0.63/0.78 % (27163)Memory used [KB]: 989
% 0.63/0.78 % (27163)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.63/0.78 % (27163)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.63/0.78 % (27163)------------------------------
% 0.63/0.78 % (27163)------------------------------
% 0.63/0.78 % (27155)Success in time 0.467 s
% 0.63/0.78 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------