TSTP Solution File: DAT003_1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : DAT003_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:04:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.53s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 7 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 44 ( 43 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 30 ( 8 ~; 13 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number arithmetic : 139 ( 0 atm; 0 fun; 120 num; 19 var)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 ari)
% Number of type conns : 5 ( 2 >; 3 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 4 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 31 !; 6 ?; 37 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
array: $tType ).
tff(func_def_0,type,
read: ( array * $int ) > $int ).
tff(func_def_1,type,
write: ( array * $int * $int ) > array ).
tff(func_def_9,type,
sK0: array ).
tff(func_def_10,type,
sK1: array ).
tff(f38,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f37,f12]) ).
tff(f12,plain,
33 != read(sK0,3),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
tff(f10,plain,
( ( sK0 = write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) )
& ( 33 != read(sK0,3) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f8,f9]) ).
tff(f9,plain,
( ? [X0: array,X1: array] :
( ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X0 )
& ( 33 != read(X0,3) ) )
=> ( ( sK0 = write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) )
& ( 33 != read(sK0,3) ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
tff(f8,plain,
? [X0: array,X1: array] :
( ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X0 )
& ( 33 != read(X0,3) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).
tff(f7,plain,
? [X1: array,X0: array] :
( ( write(write(write(write(X0,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X1 )
& ( 33 != read(X1,3) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
tff(f6,plain,
~ ! [X0: array,X1: array] :
( ( write(write(write(write(X0,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X1 )
=> ( 33 = read(X1,3) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).
tff(f4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: array,X0: array] :
( ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X0 )
=> ( 33 = read(X0,3) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3]) ).
tff(f3,conjecture,
! [X1: array,X0: array] :
( ( write(write(write(write(X1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44) = X0 )
=> ( 33 = read(X0,3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
tff(f37,plain,
33 = read(sK0,3),
inference(evaluation,[],[f32]) ).
tff(f32,plain,
( ( 3 = 5 )
| ( 33 = read(sK0,3) )
| ( 3 = 4 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f30,f14]) ).
tff(f14,plain,
! [X2: $int,X0: array,X1: $int] : ( read(write(X0,X2,X1),X2) = X1 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
tff(f11,plain,
! [X0: array,X1: $int,X2: $int] : ( read(write(X0,X2,X1),X2) = X1 ),
inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).
tff(f1,axiom,
! [X0: array,X2: $int,X1: $int] : ( read(write(X0,X1,X2),X1) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1) ).
tff(f30,plain,
! [X0: $int] :
( ( read(sK0,X0) = read(write(sK1,3,33),X0) )
| ( 4 = X0 )
| ( 5 = X0 ) ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f29]) ).
tff(f29,plain,
! [X0: $int] :
( ( 5 = X0 )
| ( read(sK0,X0) = read(write(sK1,3,33),X0) )
| ( 4 = X0 )
| ( 4 = X0 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f15,f21]) ).
tff(f21,plain,
! [X1: $int] :
( ( read(sK0,X1) = read(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,444),X1) )
| ( 5 = X1 )
| ( 4 = X1 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f17,f15]) ).
tff(f17,plain,
! [X0: $int] :
( ( read(sK0,X0) = read(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,444),5,55),X0) )
| ( 4 = X0 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f15,f13]) ).
tff(f13,plain,
sK0 = write(write(write(write(sK1,3,33),4,444),5,55),4,44),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
tff(f15,plain,
! [X2: $int,X3: array,X0: $int,X1: $int] :
( ( read(write(X3,X1,X0),X2) = read(X3,X2) )
| ( X1 = X2 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
tff(f5,plain,
! [X0: $int,X1: $int,X2: $int,X3: array] :
( ( read(write(X3,X1,X0),X2) = read(X3,X2) )
| ( X1 = X2 ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
tff(f2,axiom,
! [X6: $int,X4: $int,X5: $int,X3: array] :
( ( read(write(X3,X4,X6),X5) = read(X3,X5) )
| ( X4 = X5 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : DAT003=1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 20:36:30 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.50 % (16395)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/498Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (16387)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/68Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (16398)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=500:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/500Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (16395)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.51 % (16390)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:i=59:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/59Mi)
% 0.19/0.52 % (16377)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.52 % (16390)WARNING: trying to run FMB on interpreted or otherwise provably infinite-domain problem!
% 0.19/0.52 % (16390)Terminated due to inappropriate strategy.
% 0.19/0.52 % (16390)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52 % (16390)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.52 % (16390)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.52 % (16390)Termination reason: Inappropriate
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 % (16390)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.19/0.52 % (16390)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.52 % (16390)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.52 % (16390)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52 % (16390)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52 % (16391)ott+10_1:1_tgt=ground:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/100Mi)
% 0.19/0.52 % (16384)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/100Mi)
% 0.19/0.52 % (16378)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/48Mi)
% 0.19/0.52 % (16398)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.19/0.53 % (16395)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.53 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.53 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.53 % (16395)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.53 % (16395)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.53 % (16395)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.53 % (16395)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 % (16395)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.19/0.53 % (16395)Time elapsed: 0.086 s
% 0.19/0.53 % (16395)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.19/0.53 % (16395)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.53 % (16395)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.53 % (16372)Success in time 0.189 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------