TSTP Solution File: DAT001_1 by SPASS+T---2.2.22
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS+T---2.2.22
% Problem : DAT001_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 01:31:41 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.68s 0.99s
% Output : Refutation 0.68s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : DAT001_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.11/0.11 % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Fri Jul 1 18:00:37 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 % Using integer theory
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_23501_n009.cluster.edu
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 SPASS V 2.2.22 in combination with yices.
% 0.68/0.99 SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS.
% 0.68/0.99 Problem: /tmp/SPASST_23501_n009.cluster.edu
% 0.68/0.99 SPASS derived 6 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses and kept 43 clauses.
% 0.68/0.99 SPASS backtracked 0 times (0 times due to theory inconsistency).
% 0.68/0.99 SPASS allocated 6232 KBytes.
% 0.68/0.99 SPASS spent 0:00:00.01 on the problem.
% 0.68/0.99 0:00:00.00 for the input.
% 0.68/0.99 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.68/0.99 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.68/0.99 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.68/0.99 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.68/0.99 0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure.
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_23501_n009.cluster.edu
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 % Here is a proof with depth 5, length 19 :
% 0.68/0.99 2[0:Inp] || -> list(nil)*.
% 0.68/0.99 4[0:Inp] || -> sorted(mycons(U,nil))*.
% 0.68/0.99 5[0:Inp] || list(U) -> list(mycons(V,U))*.
% 0.68/0.99 6[0:Inp] || sorted(mycons(1,mycons(2,mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))))))* -> .
% 0.68/0.99 7[0:Inp] || list(U) sorted(mycons(V,U)) less(W,V) -> sorted(mycons(W,mycons(V,U)))*.
% 0.68/0.99 39[0:TOC:7.2] || list(U) sorted(mycons(V,U)) -> sorted(mycons(W,mycons(V,U)))* lesseq(V,W).
% 0.68/0.99 40[0:Res:39.3,6.0] || list(mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))) sorted(mycons(2,mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))))* -> lesseq(2,1).
% 0.68/0.99 41[0:ArS:40.2] || list(mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))) sorted(mycons(2,mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))))* -> .
% 0.68/0.99 44[0:Res:39.2,41.1] || list(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))) sorted(mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))))* list(mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))) -> lesseq(4,2).
% 0.68/0.99 45[0:ArS:44.3] || list(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))) sorted(mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))))* list(mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))) -> .
% 0.68/0.99 46[0:MRR:45.2,5.1] || list(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))) sorted(mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))))* -> .
% 0.68/0.99 47[0:Res:39.2,46.1] || list(mycons(100,nil)) sorted(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))* list(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))) -> lesseq(7,4).
% 0.68/0.99 48[0:ArS:47.3] || list(mycons(100,nil)) sorted(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))* list(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))) -> .
% 0.68/0.99 49[0:MRR:48.2,5.1] || list(mycons(100,nil)) sorted(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))* -> .
% 0.68/0.99 50[0:Res:39.2,49.1] || list(nil) sorted(mycons(100,nil))* list(mycons(100,nil)) -> lesseq(100,7).
% 0.68/0.99 51[0:ArS:50.3] || list(nil) sorted(mycons(100,nil))* list(mycons(100,nil)) -> .
% 0.68/0.99 52[0:MRR:51.0,51.1,2.0,4.0] || list(mycons(100,nil))* -> .
% 0.68/0.99 53[0:Res:5.1,52.0] || list(nil)* -> .
% 0.68/0.99 54(e)[0:MRR:53.0,2.0] || -> .
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_23501_n009.cluster.edu
% 0.68/0.99
% 0.68/0.99 Formulae used in the proof : fof_empty_is_sorted fof_list_type fof_single_is_sorted fof_mycons_type fof_check_list
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 SPASS+T ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------