TSTP Solution File: DAT001_1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : DAT001_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:36:56 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.76s 1.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   9 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (  16   ~;   6   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   52 (   7 atm;   0 fun;  39 num;   6 var)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    3 (   2   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   2 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (;   8   !;   0   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ sorted > mycons > #nlpp > nil

%Foreground sorts:
tff(list,type,
    list: $tType ).

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(sorted,type,
    sorted: list > $o ).

tff(nil,type,
    nil: list ).

tff(mycons,type,
    mycons: ( $int * list ) > list ).

tff(f_30,axiom,
    ! [Xa: $int] : sorted(mycons(Xa,nil)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_is_sorted) ).

tff(f_36,axiom,
    ! [Xa: $int,Ya: $int,R: list] :
      ( ( $less(Xa,Ya)
        & sorted(mycons(Ya,R)) )
     => sorted(mycons(Xa,mycons(Ya,R))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',recursive_sort) ).

tff(f_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sorted(mycons(1,mycons(2,mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',check_list) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [X_1a: $int] : sorted(mycons(X_1a,nil)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_30]) ).

tff(c_9,plain,
    ! [X_2a: $int,Y_3a: $int,R_4: list] :
      ( sorted(mycons(X_2a,mycons(Y_3a,R_4)))
      | ~ sorted(mycons(Y_3a,R_4))
      | ~ $less(X_2a,Y_3a) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_36]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ~ sorted(mycons(1,mycons(2,mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_38]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ( ~ sorted(mycons(2,mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))))
    | ~ $less(1,2) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_8]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ~ sorted(mycons(2,mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))))),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_16]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ( ~ sorted(mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))))
    | ~ $less(2,4) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_18]) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    ~ sorted(mycons(4,mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_22]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ( ~ sorted(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil)))
    | ~ $less(4,7) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_24]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    ~ sorted(mycons(7,mycons(100,nil))),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_28]) ).

tff(c_33,plain,
    ( ~ sorted(mycons(100,nil))
    | ~ $less(7,100) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_30]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    ~ $less(7,100),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_10,c_33]) ).

tff(c_39,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_36]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : DAT001_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:15:53 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.76/1.63  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.76/1.63  
% 2.76/1.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.76/1.66  
% 2.76/1.66  Inference rules
% 2.76/1.66  ----------------------
% 2.76/1.66  #Ref     : 0
% 2.76/1.66  #Sup     : 4
% 2.76/1.66  #Fact    : 0
% 2.76/1.66  #Define  : 0
% 2.76/1.66  #Split   : 0
% 2.76/1.66  #Chain   : 0
% 2.76/1.66  #Close   : 0
% 2.76/1.66  
% 2.76/1.66  Ordering : LPO
% 2.76/1.66  
% 2.76/1.66  Simplification rules
% 2.76/1.66  ----------------------
% 2.76/1.66  #Subsume      : 0
% 2.76/1.66  #Demod        : 1
% 2.76/1.66  #Tautology    : 0
% 2.76/1.66  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 2.76/1.66  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.76/1.66  
% 2.76/1.66  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.76/1.66  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.76/1.66  
% 2.76/1.66  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.76/1.66  ----------------------
% 2.76/1.66  Preprocessing        : 0.44
% 2.76/1.66  Parsing              : 0.26
% 2.76/1.66  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 2.76/1.66  Main loop            : 0.15
% 2.76/1.66  Inferencing          : 0.07
% 2.76/1.66  Reduction            : 0.03
% 2.76/1.66  Demodulation         : 0.02
% 2.76/1.66  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 2.76/1.66  Subsumption          : 0.03
% 2.76/1.66  Abstraction          : 0.00
% 2.76/1.66  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.76/1.66  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.76/1.66  Total                : 0.64
% 2.76/1.66  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.76/1.66  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.76/1.66  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.76/1.66  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------