TSTP Solution File: CSR248+1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR248+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:16:59 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 71.65s 9.86s
% Output : CNFRefutation 71.65s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 15
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 57 ( 23 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 148 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 22 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 154 ( 63 ~; 51 |; 33 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 21 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 20 ( 20 usr; 14 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 70 ( 4 sgn 29 !; 13 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(resultRelation0126,conjecture,
? [X1,X2] :
( p__d__instance(X1,c__Process)
& p__d__instance(X1,c__ChemicalProcess)
& p__d__instance(X2,c__Substance)
& p__result(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',resultRelation0126) ).
fof(typeA437,axiom,
! [X1038,X1039] :
( p__result(X1038,X1039)
=> p__d__instance(X1038,c__Process) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',typeA437) ).
fof(mergeA2636,axiom,
! [X323] :
( p__d__instance(X323,c__CompoundSubstance)
<=> ? [X324,X325,X46] :
( p__d__instance(X324,c__ElementalSubstance)
& p__d__instance(X325,c__ElementalSubstance)
& X324 != X325
& p__d__instance(X46,c__ChemicalSynthesis)
& p__resource(X46,X324)
& p__resource(X46,X325)
& p__result(X46,X323) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2636) ).
fof(predefinitionsA12,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( p__d__instance(X1,X2)
& p__d__subclass(X2,X3) )
=> p__d__instance(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',predefinitionsA12) ).
fof(mergeA233,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__PureSubstance,c__Substance),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA233) ).
fof(mergeA247,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__CompoundSubstance,c__PureSubstance),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA247) ).
fof(mergeA2633,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__ChemicalSynthesis,c__ChemicalProcess),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2633) ).
fof(mergeA2893,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Water,c__CompoundSubstance),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2893) ).
fof(miloA3175,axiom,
! [X284] :
( p__d__instance(X284,c__Dough)
=> ? [X543,X380] :
( p__d__instance(X543,c__Flour)
& p__d__instance(X380,c__Water)
& p__part(X543,X284)
& p__part(X380,X284) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA3175) ).
fof(mergeA176,axiom,
! [X7] :
( p__d__subclass(X7,c__Entity)
=> ? [X35] : p__d__instance(X35,X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA176) ).
fof(predefinitionsA8,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
& p__d__subclass(X2,X3) )
=> p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',predefinitionsA8) ).
fof(mergeA178,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Physical,c__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA178) ).
fof(miloA3149,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__PreparedFood,c__Object),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA3149) ).
fof(mergeA181,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Object,c__Physical),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA181) ).
fof(miloA3173,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Dough,c__PreparedFood),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA3173) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2] :
( p__d__instance(X1,c__Process)
& p__d__instance(X1,c__ChemicalProcess)
& p__d__instance(X2,c__Substance)
& p__result(X1,X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[resultRelation0126]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
! [X1044,X1045] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X1044,c__Process)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1044,c__ChemicalProcess)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1045,c__Substance)
| ~ p__result(X1044,X1045) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X1046,X1047] :
( ~ p__result(X1046,X1047)
| p__d__instance(X1046,c__Process) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[typeA437])])]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X323] :
( p__d__instance(X323,c__CompoundSubstance)
<=> ? [X324,X325,X46] :
( p__d__instance(X324,c__ElementalSubstance)
& p__d__instance(X325,c__ElementalSubstance)
& X324 != X325
& p__d__instance(X46,c__ChemicalSynthesis)
& p__resource(X46,X324)
& p__resource(X46,X325)
& p__result(X46,X323) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mergeA2636]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X1048,X1049,X1050] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X1048,X1049)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1049,X1050)
| p__d__instance(X1048,X1050) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[predefinitionsA12])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Process)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__ChemicalProcess)
| ~ p__d__instance(X2,c__Substance)
| ~ p__result(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__Process)
| ~ p__result(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X1172,X1176,X1177,X1178,X1179] :
( ( p__d__instance(esk18_1(X1172),c__ElementalSubstance)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1172,c__CompoundSubstance) )
& ( p__d__instance(esk19_1(X1172),c__ElementalSubstance)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1172,c__CompoundSubstance) )
& ( esk18_1(X1172) != esk19_1(X1172)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1172,c__CompoundSubstance) )
& ( p__d__instance(esk20_1(X1172),c__ChemicalSynthesis)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1172,c__CompoundSubstance) )
& ( p__resource(esk20_1(X1172),esk18_1(X1172))
| ~ p__d__instance(X1172,c__CompoundSubstance) )
& ( p__resource(esk20_1(X1172),esk19_1(X1172))
| ~ p__d__instance(X1172,c__CompoundSubstance) )
& ( p__result(esk20_1(X1172),X1172)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1172,c__CompoundSubstance) )
& ( ~ p__d__instance(X1177,c__ElementalSubstance)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1178,c__ElementalSubstance)
| X1177 = X1178
| ~ p__d__instance(X1179,c__ChemicalSynthesis)
| ~ p__resource(X1179,X1177)
| ~ p__resource(X1179,X1178)
| ~ p__result(X1179,X1176)
| p__d__instance(X1176,c__CompoundSubstance) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__PureSubstance,c__Substance),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA233]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__CompoundSubstance,c__PureSubstance),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA247]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p__result(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X2,c__Substance)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__ChemicalProcess) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( p__result(esk20_1(X1),X1)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__CompoundSubstance) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__ChemicalSynthesis,c__ChemicalProcess),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2633]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__Substance)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__PureSubstance) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__PureSubstance)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__CompoundSubstance) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p__d__instance(esk20_1(X1),c__ChemicalProcess)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Substance)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__CompoundSubstance) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__ChemicalProcess)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__ChemicalSynthesis) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__Substance)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__CompoundSubstance) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( p__d__instance(esk20_1(X1),c__ChemicalSynthesis)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__CompoundSubstance) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Water,c__CompoundSubstance),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2893]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
~ p__d__instance(X1,c__CompoundSubstance),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__CompoundSubstance)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Water) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_35]) ).
fof(c_0_38,plain,
! [X1459] :
( ( p__d__instance(esk95_1(X1459),c__Flour)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1459,c__Dough) )
& ( p__d__instance(esk96_1(X1459),c__Water)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1459,c__Dough) )
& ( p__part(esk95_1(X1459),X1459)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1459,c__Dough) )
& ( p__part(esk96_1(X1459),X1459)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1459,c__Dough) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[miloA3175])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Water),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( p__d__instance(esk96_1(X1),c__Water)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Dough) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).
fof(c_0_41,plain,
! [X2766] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X2766,c__Entity)
| p__d__instance(esk385_1(X2766),X2766) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mergeA176])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_42,plain,
! [X1099,X1100,X1101] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X1099,X1100)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1100,X1101)
| p__d__subclass(X1099,X1101) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[predefinitionsA8])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Dough),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( p__d__instance(esk385_1(X1),X1)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,X3)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Physical,c__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA178]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__PreparedFood,c__Object),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA3149]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
~ p__d__subclass(c__Dough,c__Entity),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Physical) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Object,c__Physical),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA181]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Object)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__PreparedFood) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Dough,c__PreparedFood),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA3173]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
~ p__d__subclass(c__Dough,c__Physical),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Physical)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Object) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_50]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Dough,c__Object),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_55])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR248+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 00:53:08 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 71.65/9.86 # Version: 3.1.0
% 71.65/9.86 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 71.65/9.86 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 71.65/9.86 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 71.65/9.86 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 71.65/9.86 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 71.65/9.86 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 71.65/9.86 # sh5l with pid 7353 completed with status 0
% 71.65/9.86 # Result found by sh5l
% 71.65/9.86 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 71.65/9.86 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 71.65/9.86 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 71.65/9.86 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 71.65/9.86 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 71.65/9.86 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 71.65/9.86 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 71.65/9.86 # Search class: FGHSS-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 71.65/9.86 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 71.65/9.86 # Starting G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 71.65/9.86 # G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 7356 completed with status 0
% 71.65/9.86 # Result found by G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y
% 71.65/9.86 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 71.65/9.86 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 71.65/9.86 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 71.65/9.86 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 71.65/9.86 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 71.65/9.86 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 71.65/9.86 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 71.65/9.86 # Search class: FGHSS-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 71.65/9.86 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 71.65/9.86 # Starting G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 71.65/9.86 # Preprocessing time : 0.058 s
% 71.65/9.86
% 71.65/9.86 # Proof found!
% 71.65/9.86 # SZS status Theorem
% 71.65/9.86 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 71.65/9.86 # Parsed axioms : 7433
% 71.65/9.86 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4951
% 71.65/9.86 # Initial clauses : 4043
% 71.65/9.86 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 10
% 71.65/9.86 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4033
% 71.65/9.86 # Processed clauses : 21104
% 71.65/9.86 # ...of these trivial : 219
% 71.65/9.86 # ...subsumed : 2812
% 71.65/9.86 # ...remaining for further processing : 18073
% 71.65/9.86 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 24
% 71.65/9.86 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 71.65/9.86 # Backward-subsumed : 3915
% 71.65/9.86 # Backward-rewritten : 118
% 71.65/9.86 # Generated clauses : 83177
% 71.65/9.86 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 80833
% 71.65/9.86 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 71.65/9.86 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1218
% 71.65/9.86 # Paramodulations : 83102
% 71.65/9.86 # Factorizations : 0
% 71.65/9.86 # NegExts : 0
% 71.65/9.86 # Equation resolutions : 75
% 71.65/9.86 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 71.65/9.86 # Total rewrite steps : 2412
% 71.65/9.86 # ...of those cached : 1194
% 71.65/9.86 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 71.65/9.86 # Propositional check models : 0
% 71.65/9.86 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 71.65/9.86 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 71.65/9.86 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 71.65/9.86 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 71.65/9.86 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 71.65/9.86 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 71.65/9.86 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 71.65/9.86 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 71.65/9.86 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 71.65/9.86 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 71.65/9.86 # Current number of processed clauses : 14036
% 71.65/9.86 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2623
% 71.65/9.86 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 71.65/9.86 # Negative unit clauses : 1885
% 71.65/9.86 # Non-unit-clauses : 9528
% 71.65/9.86 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 63194
% 71.65/9.86 # ...number of literals in the above : 231136
% 71.65/9.86 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 71.65/9.86 # Current number of archived clauses : 4033
% 71.65/9.86 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 23461196
% 71.65/9.86 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18761477
% 71.65/9.86 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3385
% 71.65/9.86 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5079551
% 71.65/9.86 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 71.65/9.86 # BW rewrite match attempts : 14
% 71.65/9.86 # BW rewrite match successes : 14
% 71.65/9.86 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 71.65/9.86 # Condensation successes : 0
% 71.65/9.86 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1107584
% 71.65/9.86 # Search garbage collected termcells : 65100
% 71.65/9.86
% 71.65/9.86 # -------------------------------------------------
% 71.65/9.86 # User time : 8.990 s
% 71.65/9.86 # System time : 0.109 s
% 71.65/9.86 # Total time : 9.099 s
% 71.65/9.86 # Maximum resident set size: 24300 pages
% 71.65/9.86
% 71.65/9.86 # -------------------------------------------------
% 71.65/9.86 # User time : 9.148 s
% 71.65/9.86 # System time : 0.120 s
% 71.65/9.86 # Total time : 9.268 s
% 71.65/9.86 # Maximum resident set size: 9668 pages
% 71.65/9.86 % E---3.1 exiting
% 71.65/9.86 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------