TSTP Solution File: CSR174+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR174+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:03:50 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.98s 8.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.98s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 52 ( 30 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 87 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 67 ( 32 ~; 24 |; 7 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 11 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 43 ( 3 sgn 19 !; 5 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(predefinitionsA8,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
& p__d__subclass(X2,X3) )
=> p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',predefinitionsA8) ).
fof(negatedAntonymPattern10019,conjecture,
? [X1,X2] :
( p__d__instance(X2,c__Speaking)
& p__d__instance(X1,c__Vocalizing)
& X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',negatedAntonymPattern10019) ).
fof(mergeA274,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__ContentBearingProcess,c__ContentBearingPhysical),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA274) ).
fof(mergeA177,axiom,
! [X7] :
( p__d__instance(X7,c__Class)
<=> p__d__subclass(X7,c__Entity) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA177) ).
fof(mergeA272,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__ContentBearingPhysical,c__Physical),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA272) ).
fof(mergeA2702,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__ContentBearingProcess),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2702) ).
fof(predefinitionsA12,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( p__d__instance(X1,X2)
& p__d__subclass(X2,X3) )
=> p__d__instance(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',predefinitionsA12) ).
fof(mergeA178,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Physical,c__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA178) ).
fof(mergeA2444,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Speaking,c__Vocalizing),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2444) ).
fof(mergeA2706,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Disseminating,c__Communication),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2706) ).
fof(miloA2264,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Lecture,c__Speaking),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA2264) ).
fof(mergeA176,axiom,
! [X7] :
( p__d__subclass(X7,c__Entity)
=> ? [X35] : p__d__instance(X35,X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA176) ).
fof(mergeA2708,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Demonstrating,c__Disseminating),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',mergeA2708) ).
fof(miloA2263,axiom,
p__d__subclass(c__Lecture,c__Demonstrating),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR006+0.ax',miloA2263) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X4,X5)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X5,X6)
| p__d__subclass(X4,X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[predefinitionsA8])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2] :
( p__d__instance(X2,c__Speaking)
& p__d__instance(X1,c__Vocalizing)
& X1 = X2 ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[negatedAntonymPattern10019]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__ContentBearingProcess,c__ContentBearingPhysical),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA274]) ).
fof(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X4,c__Speaking)
| ~ p__d__instance(X3,c__Vocalizing)
| X3 != X4 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X8,X8] :
( ( ~ p__d__instance(X8,c__Class)
| p__d__subclass(X8,c__Entity) )
& ( ~ p__d__subclass(X8,c__Entity)
| p__d__instance(X8,c__Class) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mergeA177])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__ContentBearingPhysical,c__Physical),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA272]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__ContentBearingPhysical)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__ContentBearingProcess) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__ContentBearingProcess),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2702]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ p__d__instance(X4,X5)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X5,X6)
| p__d__instance(X4,X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[predefinitionsA12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( X1 != X2
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Vocalizing)
| ~ p__d__instance(X2,c__Speaking) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Class) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Physical)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__ContentBearingPhysical) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__ContentBearingPhysical),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,c__Class)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Physical,c__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA178]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( p__d__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Speaking,c__Vocalizing),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2444]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Speaking)
| ~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Vocalizing) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Disseminating,c__Communication),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2706]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity)
| ~ p__d__instance(X2,c__Class)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__Physical),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
p__d__instance(c__Physical,c__Class),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Lecture,c__Speaking),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA2264]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Speaking),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]) ).
fof(c_0_39,plain,
! [X36] :
( ~ p__d__subclass(X36,c__Entity)
| p__d__instance(esk13_1(X36),X36) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mergeA176])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( p__d__subclass(X1,c__Communication)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Disseminating) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Demonstrating,c__Disseminating),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mergeA2708]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Communication,c__Entity),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36])]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
~ p__d__instance(X1,c__Lecture),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_37]),c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( p__d__instance(esk13_1(X1),X1)
| ~ p__d__subclass(X1,c__Entity) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Demonstrating,c__Communication),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
p__d__instance(c__Communication,c__Class),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Lecture,c__Demonstrating),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[miloA2263]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
~ p__d__subclass(c__Lecture,c__Entity),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
p__d__subclass(c__Demonstrating,c__Entity),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_45]),c_0_46])]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
~ p__d__instance(c__Demonstrating,c__Class),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_47]),c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_49]),c_0_50]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : CSR174+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 06:18:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.98/8.17 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 0.98/8.17 # Preprocessing time : 0.428 s
% 0.98/8.17
% 0.98/8.17 # Proof found!
% 0.98/8.17 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.98/8.17 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.98/8.17 # Proof object total steps : 52
% 0.98/8.17 # Proof object clause steps : 32
% 0.98/8.17 # Proof object formula steps : 20
% 0.98/8.17 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.98/8.17 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.98/8.17 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.98/8.17 # Proof object initial clauses used : 15
% 0.98/8.17 # Proof object initial formulas used : 14
% 0.98/8.17 # Proof object generating inferences : 16
% 0.98/8.17 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 9
% 0.98/8.17 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.98/8.17 # Parsed axioms : 7433
% 0.98/8.17 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.98/8.17 # Initial clauses : 10860
% 0.98/8.17 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 20
% 0.98/8.17 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10840
% 0.98/8.17 # Processed clauses : 17292
% 0.98/8.17 # ...of these trivial : 363
% 0.98/8.17 # ...subsumed : 247
% 0.98/8.17 # ...remaining for further processing : 16682
% 0.98/8.17 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 41
% 0.98/8.17 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.98/8.17 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.98/8.17 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.98/8.17 # Generated clauses : 83523
% 0.98/8.17 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 79847
% 0.98/8.17 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3302
% 0.98/8.17 # Paramodulations : 83423
% 0.98/8.17 # Factorizations : 1
% 0.98/8.17 # Equation resolutions : 99
% 0.98/8.17 # Current number of processed clauses : 16664
% 0.98/8.17 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7974
% 0.98/8.17 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.98/8.17 # Negative unit clauses : 137
% 0.98/8.17 # Non-unit-clauses : 8553
% 0.98/8.17 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 73315
% 0.98/8.17 # ...number of literals in the above : 241955
% 0.98/8.17 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.98/8.17 # Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.98/8.17 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19245020
% 0.98/8.17 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10762171
% 0.98/8.17 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3520
% 0.98/8.17 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9038833
% 0.98/8.17 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.98/8.17 # BW rewrite match attempts : 105
% 0.98/8.17 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.98/8.17 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.98/8.17 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.98/8.17 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1407653
% 0.98/8.17
% 0.98/8.17 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.98/8.17 # User time : 5.955 s
% 0.98/8.17 # System time : 0.085 s
% 0.98/8.17 # Total time : 6.040 s
% 0.98/8.17 # Maximum resident set size: 162200 pages
% 0.98/24.12 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.98/24.14 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.98/24.14 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.14 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.15 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.15 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.15 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.15 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.15 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.15 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.57 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.98/24.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.62 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.62 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------