TSTP Solution File: CSR158+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : CSR158+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YEVa8G5k5N true
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:08:20 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 13.80s 2.65s
% Output : Refutation 13.80s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 27
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 41 ( 9 unt; 22 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 84 ( 3 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 40 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 305 ( 14 ~; 7 |; 45 &; 226 @)
% ( 11 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 26 ( 7 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 79 ( 79 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 24 ( 22 usr; 6 con; 0-7 aty)
% Number of variables : 70 ( 0 ^; 70 !; 0 ?; 70 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__1227_type,type,
sk__1227: $i ).
thf(p__d__partition4_type,type,
p__d__partition4: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(p__d__disjointDecomposition3_type,type,
p__d__disjointDecomposition3: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(p__d__partition3_type,type,
p__d__partition3: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(p__d__partition5_type,type,
p__d__partition5: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(p__d__disjoint_type,type,
p__d__disjoint: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(p__d__exhaustiveDecomposition7_type,type,
p__d__exhaustiveDecomposition7: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(p__d__partition6_type,type,
p__d__partition6: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(p__d__exhaustiveDecomposition5_type,type,
p__d__exhaustiveDecomposition5: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(c__ConstructedLanguage_type,type,
c__ConstructedLanguage: $i ).
thf(p__d__exhaustiveDecomposition3_type,type,
p__d__exhaustiveDecomposition3: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(p__d__exhaustiveDecomposition6_type,type,
p__d__exhaustiveDecomposition6: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(p__d__disjointDecomposition6_type,type,
p__d__disjointDecomposition6: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(p__d__exhaustiveDecomposition4_type,type,
p__d__exhaustiveDecomposition4: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(p__d__disjointDecomposition5_type,type,
p__d__disjointDecomposition5: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(p__d__disjointDecomposition7_type,type,
p__d__disjointDecomposition7: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(c__NaturalLanguage_type,type,
c__NaturalLanguage: $i ).
thf(p__d__disjointDecomposition4_type,type,
p__d__disjointDecomposition4: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__1228_type,type,
sk__1228: $i ).
thf(p__d__partition7_type,type,
p__d__partition7: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(p__d__instance_type,type,
p__d__instance: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(c__HumanLanguage_type,type,
c__HumanLanguage: $i ).
thf(antonymPattern10010,conjecture,
! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( ( p__d__instance @ X @ c__ConstructedLanguage )
& ( p__d__instance @ Y @ c__NaturalLanguage ) )
=> ( X != Y ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( ( p__d__instance @ X @ c__ConstructedLanguage )
& ( p__d__instance @ Y @ c__NaturalLanguage ) )
=> ( X != Y ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[antonymPattern10010]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl10752,plain,
p__d__instance @ sk__1227 @ c__ConstructedLanguage,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(mergeA299,axiom,
p__d__partition3 @ c__HumanLanguage @ c__NaturalLanguage @ c__ConstructedLanguage ).
thf(zip_derived_cl375,plain,
p__d__partition3 @ c__HumanLanguage @ c__NaturalLanguage @ c__ConstructedLanguage,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[mergeA299]) ).
thf(predefinitionsA18,axiom,
( ! [CLASS: $i,ROW1: $i,ROW2: $i,ROW3: $i,ROW4: $i,ROW5: $i,ROW6: $i] :
( ( p__d__partition7 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 @ ROW3 @ ROW4 @ ROW5 @ ROW6 )
<=> ( ( p__d__exhaustiveDecomposition7 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 @ ROW3 @ ROW4 @ ROW5 @ ROW6 )
& ( p__d__disjointDecomposition7 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 @ ROW3 @ ROW4 @ ROW5 @ ROW6 ) ) )
& ! [CLASS: $i,ROW1: $i,ROW2: $i,ROW3: $i,ROW4: $i,ROW5: $i] :
( ( p__d__partition6 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 @ ROW3 @ ROW4 @ ROW5 )
<=> ( ( p__d__exhaustiveDecomposition6 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 @ ROW3 @ ROW4 @ ROW5 )
& ( p__d__disjointDecomposition6 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 @ ROW3 @ ROW4 @ ROW5 ) ) )
& ! [CLASS: $i,ROW1: $i,ROW2: $i,ROW3: $i,ROW4: $i] :
( ( p__d__partition5 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 @ ROW3 @ ROW4 )
<=> ( ( p__d__exhaustiveDecomposition5 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 @ ROW3 @ ROW4 )
& ( p__d__disjointDecomposition5 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 @ ROW3 @ ROW4 ) ) )
& ! [CLASS: $i,ROW1: $i,ROW2: $i,ROW3: $i] :
( ( p__d__partition4 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 @ ROW3 )
<=> ( ( p__d__exhaustiveDecomposition4 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 @ ROW3 )
& ( p__d__disjointDecomposition4 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 @ ROW3 ) ) )
& ! [CLASS: $i,ROW1: $i,ROW2: $i] :
( ( p__d__partition3 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 )
<=> ( ( p__d__exhaustiveDecomposition3 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 )
& ( p__d__disjointDecomposition3 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl9,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( p__d__disjointDecomposition3 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( p__d__partition3 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[predefinitionsA18]) ).
thf(predefinitionsA24,axiom,
( ! [CLASS: $i,ROW1: $i,ROW2: $i,ROW3: $i,ROW4: $i,ROW5: $i,ROW6: $i] :
( ( p__d__disjointDecomposition7 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 @ ROW3 @ ROW4 @ ROW5 @ ROW6 )
<=> ( ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW1 @ ROW2 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW1 @ ROW3 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW1 @ ROW4 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW1 @ ROW5 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW1 @ ROW6 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW2 @ ROW3 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW2 @ ROW4 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW2 @ ROW5 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW2 @ ROW6 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW3 @ ROW4 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW3 @ ROW5 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW3 @ ROW6 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW4 @ ROW5 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW4 @ ROW6 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW5 @ ROW6 ) ) )
& ! [CLASS: $i,ROW1: $i,ROW2: $i,ROW3: $i,ROW4: $i,ROW5: $i] :
( ( p__d__disjointDecomposition6 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 @ ROW3 @ ROW4 @ ROW5 )
<=> ( ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW1 @ ROW2 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW1 @ ROW3 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW1 @ ROW4 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW1 @ ROW5 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW2 @ ROW3 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW2 @ ROW4 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW2 @ ROW5 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW3 @ ROW4 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW3 @ ROW5 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW4 @ ROW5 ) ) )
& ! [CLASS: $i,ROW1: $i,ROW2: $i,ROW3: $i,ROW4: $i] :
( ( p__d__disjointDecomposition5 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 @ ROW3 @ ROW4 )
<=> ( ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW1 @ ROW2 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW1 @ ROW3 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW1 @ ROW4 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW2 @ ROW3 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW2 @ ROW4 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW3 @ ROW4 ) ) )
& ! [CLASS: $i,ROW1: $i,ROW2: $i,ROW3: $i] :
( ( p__d__disjointDecomposition4 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 @ ROW3 )
<=> ( ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW1 @ ROW2 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW1 @ ROW3 )
& ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW2 @ ROW3 ) ) )
& ! [CLASS: $i,ROW1: $i,ROW2: $i] :
( ( p__d__disjointDecomposition3 @ CLASS @ ROW1 @ ROW2 )
<=> ( p__d__disjoint @ ROW1 @ ROW2 ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl53,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( p__d__disjoint @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( p__d__disjointDecomposition3 @ X2 @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[predefinitionsA24]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl27742,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( p__d__partition3 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0 )
| ( p__d__disjoint @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl9,zip_derived_cl53]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl30236,plain,
p__d__disjoint @ c__NaturalLanguage @ c__ConstructedLanguage,
inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl375,zip_derived_cl27742]) ).
thf(predefinitionsA15,axiom,
! [CLASS1: $i,CLASS2: $i] :
( ( p__d__disjoint @ CLASS1 @ CLASS2 )
<=> ! [INST: $i] :
( ~ ( p__d__instance @ INST @ CLASS2 )
| ~ ( p__d__instance @ INST @ CLASS1 ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( p__d__instance @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( p__d__instance @ X0 @ X2 )
| ~ ( p__d__disjoint @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[predefinitionsA15]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl31110,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( p__d__instance @ X0 @ c__ConstructedLanguage )
| ~ ( p__d__instance @ X0 @ c__NaturalLanguage ) ),
inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl30236,zip_derived_cl4]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl31155,plain,
~ ( p__d__instance @ sk__1227 @ c__NaturalLanguage ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl10752,zip_derived_cl31110]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl10751,plain,
p__d__instance @ sk__1228 @ c__NaturalLanguage,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl10750,plain,
sk__1227 = sk__1228,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl31154,plain,
p__d__instance @ sk__1227 @ c__NaturalLanguage,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl10751,zip_derived_cl10750]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl31156,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl31155,zip_derived_cl31154]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : CSR158+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YEVa8G5k5N true
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 10:49:31 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.20/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.20/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.67 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.67 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.67 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.83 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 3.09/1.07 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 3.09/1.13 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo17_bce.sh running for 50s
% 13.80/2.65 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 13.80/2.65 % BCE start: 10753
% 13.80/2.65 % BCE eliminated: 6
% 13.80/2.65 % PE start: 10747
% 13.80/2.65 logic: eq
% 13.80/2.65 % PE eliminated: 1103
% 13.80/2.65 % done 31 iterations in 1.887s
% 13.80/2.65 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 13.80/2.65 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 13.80/2.66
% 13.80/2.66
% 13.80/2.66 % Terminating...
% 14.48/2.76 % Runner terminated.
% 14.48/2.78 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------