TSTP Solution File: CSR153^2 by Leo-III---1.7.10

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.10
% Problem  : CSR153^2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  7 07:39:03 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 50.11s 8.58s
% Output   : Refutation 50.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  13 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (   7 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  197 (  38   ~;  17   |;  14   &; 128   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   36 (  36   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   0   ^  36   !;   3   ?;  39   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(num_type,type,
    num: $tType ).

thf(brother_THFTYPE_IiioI_type,type,
    brother_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI_type,type,
    instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i_type,type,
    lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lBob_THFTYPE_i_type,type,
    lBob_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lIrreflexiveRelation_THFTYPE_i_type,type,
    lIrreflexiveRelation_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i_type,type,
    lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i_type,type,
    lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(sister_THFTYPE_IiioI_type,type,
    sister_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(32,axiom,
    ( ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
    & ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBob_THFTYPE_i )
    & ( brother_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_029) ).

thf(215,plain,
    ( ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
    & ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBob_THFTYPE_i )
    & ( brother_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[32]) ).

thf(218,plain,
    sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[215]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ? [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( A @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
      & ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBob_THFTYPE_i )
      & ~ ! [B: $i,C: $i] : ( A @ B @ C ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( A @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBob_THFTYPE_i )
        & ~ ! [B: $i,C: $i] : ( A @ B @ C ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(131,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( A @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBob_THFTYPE_i )
        & ~ ! [B: $i,C: $i] : ( A @ B @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(132,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( A @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
      | ~ ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBob_THFTYPE_i )
      | ( A @ B @ C ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[131]) ).

thf(356,plain,
    ! [C: $i > $i > $o,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ~ ( C @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
      | ~ ~ ( C @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBob_THFTYPE_i )
      | ~ ( C @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(prim_subst,[status(thm)],[132:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [E: $i] : ^ [F: $i] : ~ ( D @ E @ F ) ))]]) ).

thf(426,plain,
    ! [C: $i > $i > $o,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( C @ A @ B )
      | ( C @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBob_THFTYPE_i )
      | ( C @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[356]) ).

thf(427,plain,
    ! [C: $i > $i > $o,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( C @ A @ B )
      | ( C @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBob_THFTYPE_i )
      | ( C @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[426]) ).

thf(929,plain,
    ! [C: $i > $i > $o,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBob_THFTYPE_i )
      | ( C @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
      | ( ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
       != ( C @ A @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[218,427]) ).

thf(944,plain,
    ( ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
    | ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBill_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[929:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( lSue_THFTYPE_i )),bind(C,$thf( ^ [D: $i] : ^ [E: $i] : ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ E @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ))]]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lSue_THFTYPE_i )
    & ~ ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
    & ~ ( brother_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_004) ).

thf(145,plain,
    ( ~ ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lSue_THFTYPE_i )
    & ~ ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
    & ~ ( brother_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(147,plain,
    ~ ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[145]) ).

thf(598,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( A @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
      | ~ ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBob_THFTYPE_i )
      | ( ( A @ B @ C )
       != ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[132,147]) ).

thf(601,plain,
    ( ~ ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
    | ~ ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[598:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [D: $i] : ^ [E: $i] : ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ D @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )),bind(B,$thf( lMary_THFTYPE_i )),bind(C,$thf( C ))]]) ).

thf(1343,plain,
    ( ~ ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[601,218]) ).

thf(1344,plain,
    ~ ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[1343]) ).

thf(45,axiom,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI @ A @ lIrreflexiveRelation_THFTYPE_i )
      = ( ! [B: $i] :
            ~ ( A @ B @ B ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_042) ).

thf(253,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI @ A @ lIrreflexiveRelation_THFTYPE_i )
      = ( ! [B: $i] :
            ~ ( A @ B @ B ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[45]) ).

thf(254,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI @ A @ lIrreflexiveRelation_THFTYPE_i )
      = ( ! [B: $i] :
            ~ ( A @ B @ B ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[253]) ).

thf(255,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI @ A @ lIrreflexiveRelation_THFTYPE_i )
      = ( ! [B: $i] :
            ~ ( A @ B @ B ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[254]) ).

thf(75,axiom,
    instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI @ sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lIrreflexiveRelation_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_072) ).

thf(288,plain,
    instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI @ sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lIrreflexiveRelation_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[75]) ).

thf(5210,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ! [B: $i] :
          ~ ( A @ B @ B )
      | ( ( instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI @ A @ lIrreflexiveRelation_THFTYPE_i )
       != ( instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI @ sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lIrreflexiveRelation_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[255,288]) ).

thf(5211,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ A ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[5210:[bind(A,$thf( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI ))]]) ).

thf(5431,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( sister_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[5211]) ).

thf(5992,plain,
    ( $false
    | $false ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[944,1344,5431]) ).

thf(5993,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[5992]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.09  % Problem  : CSR153^2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.09/0.12  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Mon May  6 15:32:09 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.85/0.82  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.33/1.04  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (220ms). 
% 1.52/1.06  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.82/1.33  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.95/1.34  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 1.95/1.34  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.15/1.43  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 128 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.15/1.45  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 128 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.27/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.56/1.55  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.56/1.55  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 50.11/8.57  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 50.11/8.58  % Time passed: 8150ms (effective reasoning time: 7514ms)
% 50.11/8.58  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 50.11/8.58  % Axioms used in derivation (4): ax_029, ax_004, ax_042, ax_072
% 50.11/8.58  % No. of inferences in proof: 30
% 50.11/8.58  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 8150 ms resp. 7514 ms w/o parsing
% 50.11/8.62  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 50.11/8.62  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------