TSTP Solution File: CSR152_8 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : CSR152_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:36:01 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.55s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 18
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 58 ( 17 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 268 ( 36 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 104 ( 41 ~; 42 |; 10 &)
% ( 8 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 154 ( 152 fml; 2 var)
% Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 2 ( 1 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 17 ( 14 usr; 14 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 10 !; 3 ?; 3 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
num: $tType ).
tff(func_def_6,type,
bG0: $o ).
tff(func_def_7,type,
bG1: $o ).
tff(func_def_8,type,
bG2: $o ).
tff(pred_def_1,type,
knows_THFTYPE_IiooI: ( $i * $o ) > $o ).
tff(f89,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f43,f51,f65,f80,f88]) ).
tff(f88,plain,
( spl4_1
| spl4_3 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f87]) ).
tff(f87,plain,
( $false
| spl4_1
| spl4_3 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f85,f77]) ).
tff(f77,plain,
( ~ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI(lChris_THFTYPE_i,$false)
| spl4_1 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f32,f74]) ).
tff(f74,plain,
( ( $false = bG2 )
| spl4_1 ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f71]) ).
tff(f71,plain,
( ( $true != $true )
| ( $false = bG2 )
| spl4_1 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f37,f7]) ).
tff(f7,plain,
! [X0: $o] :
( ( $true = (X0) )
| ( $false = (X0) ) ),
introduced(fool_axiom,[]) ).
tff(f37,plain,
( ( $true != bG2 )
| spl4_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f35]) ).
tff(f35,plain,
( spl4_1
<=> ( $true = bG2 ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_1])]) ).
tff(f32,plain,
~ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI(lChris_THFTYPE_i,bG2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).
tff(f14,plain,
~ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI(lChris_THFTYPE_i,bG2),
inference(flattening,[],[f13]) ).
tff(f13,plain,
~ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI(lChris_THFTYPE_i,bG2),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5,f12]) ).
tff(f12,plain,
( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
<=> ( $true = bG2 ) ),
introduced(fool_formula_definition,[new_symbols(definition,[bG2])]) ).
tff(f5,negated_conjecture,
~ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI(lChris_THFTYPE_i,likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f4]) ).
tff(f4,conjecture,
knows_THFTYPE_IiooI(lChris_THFTYPE_i,likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
tff(f85,plain,
( knows_THFTYPE_IiooI(lChris_THFTYPE_i,$false)
| spl4_3 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f31,f82]) ).
tff(f82,plain,
( ( $false = bG1 )
| spl4_3 ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f81]) ).
tff(f81,plain,
( ( $true != $true )
| ( $false = bG1 )
| spl4_3 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f47,f7]) ).
tff(f47,plain,
( ( $true != bG1 )
| spl4_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f45]) ).
tff(f45,plain,
( spl4_3
<=> ( $true = bG1 ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_3])]) ).
tff(f31,plain,
knows_THFTYPE_IiooI(lChris_THFTYPE_i,bG1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
tff(f11,plain,
knows_THFTYPE_IiooI(lChris_THFTYPE_i,bG1),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3,f10]) ).
tff(f10,plain,
( ! [X0] :
( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X0)
=> likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X0) )
<=> ( $true = bG1 ) ),
introduced(fool_formula_definition,[new_symbols(definition,[bG1])]) ).
tff(f3,axiom,
knows_THFTYPE_IiooI(lChris_THFTYPE_i,
! [X0] :
( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X0)
=> likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X0) )),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_002) ).
tff(f80,plain,
( spl4_2
| ~ spl4_4 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f79,f49,f39]) ).
tff(f39,plain,
( spl4_2
<=> likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_2])]) ).
tff(f49,plain,
( spl4_4
<=> ! [X0] :
( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X0)
| ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X0) ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_4])]) ).
tff(f79,plain,
( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
| ~ spl4_4 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f50,f30]) ).
tff(f30,plain,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tff(f2,axiom,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_001) ).
tff(f50,plain,
( ! [X0: $i] :
( ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X0)
| likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X0) )
| ~ spl4_4 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f49]) ).
tff(f65,plain,
~ spl4_1,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f64]) ).
tff(f64,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl4_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f62,f63]) ).
tff(f63,plain,
( ~ knows_THFTYPE_IiooI(lChris_THFTYPE_i,$true)
| ~ spl4_1 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f32,f36]) ).
tff(f36,plain,
( ( $true = bG2 )
| ~ spl4_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f35]) ).
tff(f62,plain,
knows_THFTYPE_IiooI(lChris_THFTYPE_i,$true),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f29,f33]) ).
tff(f33,plain,
$true = bG0,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f27]) ).
tff(f27,plain,
( ( $true = bG0 )
| ( lChris_THFTYPE_i != lChris_THFTYPE_i ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).
tff(f21,plain,
( ( ( lChris_THFTYPE_i = lChris_THFTYPE_i )
| ( $true != bG0 ) )
& ( ( $true = bG0 )
| ( lChris_THFTYPE_i != lChris_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
tff(f8,plain,
( ( lChris_THFTYPE_i = lChris_THFTYPE_i )
<=> ( $true = bG0 ) ),
introduced(fool_formula_definition,[new_symbols(definition,[bG0])]) ).
tff(f29,plain,
knows_THFTYPE_IiooI(lChris_THFTYPE_i,bG0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
tff(f9,plain,
knows_THFTYPE_IiooI(lChris_THFTYPE_i,bG0),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f1,f8]) ).
tff(f1,axiom,
knows_THFTYPE_IiooI(lChris_THFTYPE_i,lChris_THFTYPE_i = lChris_THFTYPE_i),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax) ).
tff(f51,plain,
( ~ spl4_3
| spl4_4 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f26,f49,f45]) ).
tff(f26,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X0)
| ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X0)
| ( $true != bG1 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).
tff(f20,plain,
( ( ! [X0] :
( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X0)
| ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X0) )
| ( $true != bG1 ) )
& ( ( $true = bG1 )
| ( ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,sK3)
& likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,sK3) ) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3])],[f18,f19]) ).
tff(f19,plain,
( ? [X1] :
( ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X1)
& likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X1) )
=> ( ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,sK3)
& likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,sK3) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
tff(f18,plain,
( ( ! [X0] :
( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X0)
| ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X0) )
| ( $true != bG1 ) )
& ( ( $true = bG1 )
| ? [X1] :
( ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X1)
& likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X1) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f17]) ).
tff(f17,plain,
( ( ! [X0] :
( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X0)
| ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X0) )
| ( $true != bG1 ) )
& ( ( $true = bG1 )
| ? [X0] :
( ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X0)
& likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X0) ) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
tff(f15,plain,
( ! [X0] :
( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X0)
| ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X0) )
<=> ( $true = bG1 ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
tff(f43,plain,
( ~ spl4_2
| spl4_1 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f22,f35,f39]) ).
tff(f22,plain,
( ( $true = bG2 )
| ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).
tff(f16,plain,
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
| ( $true != bG2 ) )
& ( ( $true = bG2 )
| ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10 % Problem : CSR152_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.02/0.11 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:06:23 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.31 This is a TX0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.11/0.31 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.74 % (6937)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6938)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6939)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6940)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6941)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6942)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6943)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6944)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6940)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (6940)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6940)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6941)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (6941)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6941)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6940)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74 % (6940)Memory used [KB]: 951
% 0.55/0.74 % (6940)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.55/0.74 % (6940)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6942)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (6942)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6942)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6944)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (6944)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6944)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6941)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74 % (6941)Memory used [KB]: 954
% 0.55/0.74 % (6944)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74 % (6941)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.55/0.74 % (6944)Memory used [KB]: 949
% 0.55/0.74 % (6944)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.55/0.74 % (6941)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6944)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6937)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (6937)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6937)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6937)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74 % (6937)Memory used [KB]: 976
% 0.55/0.74 % (6937)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.55/0.74 % (6937)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6942)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74 % (6942)Memory used [KB]: 951
% 0.55/0.74 % (6942)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.55/0.74 % (6943)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (6943)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6943)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6943)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74 % (6943)Memory used [KB]: 961
% 0.55/0.74 % (6943)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.55/0.74 % (6943)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6942)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.74 % (6940)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6940)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6944)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6944)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6941)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6941)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6937)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6937)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6943)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6943)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6942)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6942)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (6938)First to succeed.
% 0.55/0.74 % (6939)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.55/0.74 % (6938)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-6936"
% 0.55/0.74 % (6938)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.55/0.74 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.74 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.75 % (6938)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75 % (6938)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.75 % (6938)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.55/0.75
% 0.55/0.75 % (6938)Memory used [KB]: 999
% 0.55/0.75 % (6938)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.55/0.75 % (6938)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.55/0.75 % (6936)Success in time 0.429 s
% 0.55/0.75 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------