TSTP Solution File: CSR152^1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : CSR152^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:36:00 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : CSR152^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sun May 19 00:41:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.36 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.38 % (29338)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29339)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29336)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29334)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29340)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29337)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29335)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29338)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38 % (29338)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29338)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29338)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (29338)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.14/0.38 % (29338)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (29338)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29338)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29338)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29333)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29336)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38 % (29336)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29336)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29336)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (29337)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.38 % (29337)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29337)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29337)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.38 % (29337)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (29337)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (29337)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (29337)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29337)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29337)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (29336)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (29336)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (29336)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29336)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29336)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29340)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38 % (29340)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29340)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29340)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (29340)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (29340)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (29340)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29340)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29340)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29335)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38 % (29335)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29335)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29335)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (29335)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (29335)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (29335)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29335)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29335)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29334)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38 % (29334)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29334)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29334)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (29334)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (29334)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (29334)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29334)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29334)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29339)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.38 % (29333)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.38 % (29339)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.38 thf(func_def_0, type, num: $tType).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(func_def_1, type, knows_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(func_def_6, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(func_def_16, type, ph1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f60,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 $false),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f55,f22])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f22,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != $true)),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f21])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f21,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ($true != $true) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != $true)),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f17,f20])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f20,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f19])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f19,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ($true = (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (lChris_THFTYPE_i = lChris_THFTYPE_i)))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ($true = (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (lChris_THFTYPE_i = lChris_THFTYPE_i)))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (lChris_THFTYPE_i = lChris_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f1])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f1,axiom,(
% 0.14/0.38 (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (lChris_THFTYPE_i = lChris_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.14/0.38 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax)).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f17,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) != $true)),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f15,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) != $true)),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(flattening,[],[f8])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ~((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ~(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f5])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f5,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.38 ~(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f4])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f4,conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.38 (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.14/0.38 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con)).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f55,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f49])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f49,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ($false = $true) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(superposition,[],[f34,f18])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f18,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f11])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f2,axiom,(
% 0.14/0.38 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 0.14/0.38 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_001)).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f34,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($false = (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1)) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f33,f22])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f33,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true) | ($false = (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1)) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f32])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f32,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)) = $true) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f31])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f31,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($true = ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))) @ X1)) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(pi_clausification,[],[f25])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f25,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true) | ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0)))) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f24])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f24,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0)))))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f23])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f23,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ($true != $true) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0)))))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f17,f16])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f16,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f13])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ ! [X0] : ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f3])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f3,axiom,(
% 0.14/0.38 (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ ! [X0] : ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))),
% 0.14/0.38 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_002)).
% 0.14/0.38 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.38 % (29339)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29339)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29339)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (29339)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (29339)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (29339)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (29339)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29339)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (29332)Success in time 0.018 s
% 0.14/0.38 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------