TSTP Solution File: CSR149^1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : CSR149^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 04:52:21 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 0.39s
% Output : Refutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : CSR149^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.36 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 20:21:23 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.37 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.16/0.37 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uVyKyAo9Ja/Vampire---4.8_6588
% 0.16/0.39 % (6845)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6843)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6844)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6846)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6847)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6848)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6850)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6849)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6846)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.39 % (6846)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6846)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6847)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.39 % (6847)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6847)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6846)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.16/0.39 % (6846)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 % (6846)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.16/0.39 % (6846)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.39 % (6846)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6846)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6846)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6848)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.16/0.39 % (6848)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6848)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6848)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 % (6848)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.16/0.39 % (6848)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.39 % (6848)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6848)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6848)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6847)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.16/0.39 % (6847)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 % (6847)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.16/0.39 % (6847)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.39 % (6847)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6847)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6847)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6845)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.16/0.39 % (6845)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6845)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6845)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 % (6845)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.16/0.39 % (6845)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.39 % (6845)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6845)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6845)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6850)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.39 % (6850)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6850)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6850)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.16/0.39 % (6850)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 % (6850)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.16/0.39 % (6850)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.39 % (6850)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6850)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6850)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6844)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.16/0.39 % (6844)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6844)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6844)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 % (6844)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.16/0.39 % (6844)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.39 % (6844)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6844)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6844)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6843)First to succeed.
% 0.16/0.39 % (6849)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.16/0.39 % (6843)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.16/0.39 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.16/0.39 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% 0.16/0.39 thf(func_def_0, type, num: $tType).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(func_def_1, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(func_def_5, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(func_def_6, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(func_def_16, type, ph1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f72,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 $false),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f28,f30,f50,f65,f71])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f71,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ~spl0_3),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f70])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f70,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 $false | ~spl0_3),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f67])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f67,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ($true = $false) | ~spl0_3),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(superposition,[],[f17,f46])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f46,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ( ! [X2 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2) = $false)) ) | ~spl0_3),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f45])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f45,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 spl0_3 <=> ! [X2] : ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2) = $false)),
% 0.16/0.39 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f17,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(rectify,[],[f1])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f1,axiom,(
% 0.16/0.39 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 0.16/0.39 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uVyKyAo9Ja/Vampire---4.8_6588',ax)).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f65,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ~spl0_4),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f64])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f64,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 $false | ~spl0_4),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(equality_resolution,[],[f49])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f49,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ( ! [X0 : $i] : ((n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0)) ) | ~spl0_4),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f48])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f48,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 spl0_4 <=> ! [X0] : (n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0)),
% 0.16/0.39 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f50,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 spl0_3 | spl0_4 | ~spl0_1),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f43,f23,f48,f45])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f23,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 spl0_1 <=> ! [X2] : ($true != (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2))),
% 0.16/0.39 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f43,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i] : ((n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2) = $false)) ) | ~spl0_1),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f42,f24])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f24,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ( ! [X2 : $i] : (($true != (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2))) ) | ~spl0_1),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f23])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f42,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i] : (($true = (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2)) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2) = $false) | (n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0)) ) | ~spl0_1),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f41,f24])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f41,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) = $true) | (n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2) = $false) | ($true = (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2))) )),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f40])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f40,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) = $true) | (n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0) | ($true = ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X2) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2)))) )),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f39])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f39,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) = $true) | ($true = ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))) @ X2))) )),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(pi_clausification,[],[f33])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f33,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) = $true) | ($true = (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))) | (n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0)) )),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f32])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f32,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) != (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))) | (n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0)) )),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f31])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f31,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true != $true) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) != (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))) | (n2009_THFTYPE_i != X0)) )),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f18,f16])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f16,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))))),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))))),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ! [X0] : ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(rectify,[],[f3])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f3,axiom,(
% 0.16/0.39 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ! [X1] : ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)))),
% 0.16/0.39 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uVyKyAo9Ja/Vampire---4.8_6588',ax_002)).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f18,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true != (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X1) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))) )),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f15,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ! [X0,X1] : ($true != (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X1) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f14])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ~? [X0,X1] : ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X1) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f13])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ~? [X0,X1] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X1) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0))),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(rectify,[],[f5])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f5,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.16/0.39 ~? [X1,X0] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1))),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f4])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f4,conjecture,(
% 0.16/0.39 ? [X1,X0] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1))),
% 0.16/0.39 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uVyKyAo9Ja/Vampire---4.8_6588',con)).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f30,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ~spl0_2),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f29])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f29,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 $false | ~spl0_2),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(equality_resolution,[],[f27])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f27,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) != X1)) ) | ~spl0_2),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f26])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f26,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 spl0_2 <=> ! [X0,X1] : ((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) != X1)),
% 0.16/0.39 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f28,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 spl0_1 | spl0_2),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f21,f26,f23])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f21,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) != X1) | ($true != (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2))) )),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f20])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f20,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ X0) != X1) | ($true != (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2)) | ($true != $true)) )),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f18,f19])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f19,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X0 @ $true))) )),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ! [X0] : ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X0 @ $true))),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f11])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.16/0.39 ! [X0] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X0 @ $true)),
% 0.16/0.39 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.16/0.39 thf(f2,axiom,(
% 0.16/0.39 ! [X0] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X0 @ $true)),
% 0.16/0.39 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uVyKyAo9Ja/Vampire---4.8_6588',ax_001)).
% 0.16/0.39 % SZS output end Proof for Vampire---4
% 0.16/0.39 % (6843)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6843)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6843)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 % (6843)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.16/0.39 % (6843)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.16/0.39 % (6843)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.16/0.39 % (6843)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6843)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39 % (6842)Success in time 0.008 s
% 0.16/0.40 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------