TSTP Solution File: CSR149^1 by Duper---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Duper---1.0
% Problem : CSR149^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : duper %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 21:12:07 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.48s 3.71s
% Output : Proof 3.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CSR149^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : duper %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 13:25:19 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 3.48/3.71 SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.48/3.71 SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI Y True) True
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.48/3.71 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i)
% 3.48/3.71 (∀ (X : Iota), likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i X → likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i X))
% 3.48/3.71 True
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.48/3.71 (Not
% 3.48/3.71 (Exists fun X =>
% 3.48/3.71 Exists fun Y => holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI Y) (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i X)))
% 3.48/3.71 True
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #4 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI a True) True
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #6 (by identity boolHoist #[2]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True)
% 3.48/3.71 (Eq (∀ (X : Iota), likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i X → likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i X) True)
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #12 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.48/3.71 Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True)
% 3.48/3.71 (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i a → likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a) True)
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #13 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.48/3.71 Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True)
% 3.48/3.71 (Or (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i a) False) (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a) True))
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #14 (by superposition #[13, 0]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True)
% 3.48/3.71 (Or (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True) (Eq False True))
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True)
% 3.48/3.71 (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True)
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #16 (by clausification #[3]): Eq
% 3.48/3.71 (Exists fun X =>
% 3.48/3.71 Exists fun Y => holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI Y) (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i X))
% 3.48/3.71 False
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.48/3.71 Eq (Exists fun Y => holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI Y) (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a)) False
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI a) (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1)) False
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #19 (by identity loobHoist #[18]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.48/3.71 Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI a) True) False)
% 3.48/3.71 (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1) False)
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #20 (by identity boolHoist #[18]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.48/3.71 Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI a) False) False)
% 3.48/3.71 (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1) True)
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #21 (by superposition #[19, 4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a) False) (Eq False True)
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #22 (by clausification #[21]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a) False
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #23 (by backward demodulation #[22, 15]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #25 (by clausification #[23]): Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #26 (by superposition #[20, 25]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a) True)
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #27 (by clausification #[26]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a) True
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #28 (by superposition #[27, 22]): Eq True False
% 3.48/3.71 Clause #29 (by clausification #[28]): False
% 3.48/3.71 SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------