TSTP Solution File: CSR147+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : CSR147+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:23:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.47s 0.71s
% Output   : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : CSR147+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 07:02:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.36  Fri Jun 10 07:02:40 2022
% 0.19/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 30258.
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 17 during input processing: 0 [copy,17,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 6
% 0.19/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 16
% 0.19/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 37
% 0.19/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 71
% 0.19/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 14
% 0.19/0.39     distinct predicate count: 7
% 0.19/0.39     distinct function count: 1
% 0.19/0.39     distinct constant count: 6
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.47/0.71  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.47/0.71  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Model 7 [ 1 1 218 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Model 8 [ 1 0 94 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Model 9 [ 1 1 14906 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.33 sec ----> 38 [hyper,13,31,12,11] {-} $F.
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 2.
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.47/0.71  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.47/0.71  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  3 [] {+} -s__Human(A)| -s__age(A,B)| -s__age(s__siblingFn(A),C)| -greater(B,C)|s__more_experienced(A,s__siblingFn(A))|s__has_seen_more(s__siblingFn(A),A).
% 0.47/0.71  5 [] {+} -s__has_seen_more(geoff,jim).
% 0.47/0.71  6 [] {+} -s__more_experienced(jim,geoff).
% 0.47/0.71  10 [] {+} s__Human(jim).
% 0.47/0.71  11 [] {+} s__age(geoff,n48).
% 0.47/0.71  12 [] {+} s__age(jim,n54).
% 0.47/0.71  13 [] {+} greater(n54,n48).
% 0.47/0.71  14 [] {-} geoff=s__siblingFn(jim).
% 0.47/0.71  16,15 [copy,14,flip.1] {+} s__siblingFn(jim)=geoff.
% 0.47/0.71  31 [para_from,15.1.1,3.6.1,demod,16,16,unit_del,10,6,5] {-} -s__age(jim,A)| -s__age(geoff,B)| -greater(A,B).
% 0.47/0.71  38 [hyper,13,31,12,11] {-} $F.
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.47/0.71  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  ============ end of search ============
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  true clauses given           2      (18.2%)
% 0.47/0.71  false clauses given          9
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.47/0.71     2  0         1
% 0.47/0.71     3  0         3
% 0.47/0.71     8  0         1
% 0.47/0.71     9  0         3
% 0.47/0.71    10  0         5
% 0.47/0.71    11  0         1
% 0.47/0.71    12  0         2
% 0.47/0.71    15  1         0
% 0.47/0.71    16  1         0
% 0.47/0.71  tot:  2         16      (88.9% true)
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Model 9 [ 1 1 14906 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.47/0.71  
% 0.47/0.71  Process 30258 finished Fri Jun 10 07:02:40 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------