TSTP Solution File: CSR147+1 by PyRes---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : CSR147+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:19:26 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 2.25s 2.46s
% Output : Refutation 2.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : CSR147+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 9 01:23:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 2.25/2.46 % Version: 1.5
% 2.25/2.46 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.25/2.46 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 2.25/2.46 fof(jim_has_seen_more,axiom,(~s__has_seen_more(geoff,jim)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', jim_has_seen_more)).
% 2.25/2.46 fof(c10,plain,~s__has_seen_more(geoff,jim),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[jim_has_seen_more])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c11,plain,~s__has_seen_more(geoff,jim),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c10])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(reflexivity,axiom,X11=X11,theory(equality)).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(symmetry,axiom,X12!=X13|X13=X12,theory(equality)).
% 2.25/2.46 fof(geoff_and_jim,axiom,geoff=s__siblingFn(jim),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', geoff_and_jim)).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c12,plain,geoff=s__siblingFn(jim),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[geoff_and_jim])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c47,plain,s__siblingFn(jim)=geoff,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c12, symmetry])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c5,axiom,X41!=X43|X42!=X40|~s__has_seen_more(X41,X42)|s__has_seen_more(X43,X40),theory(equality)).
% 2.25/2.46 fof(jim_is_experienced,conjecture,s__more_experienced(jim,geoff),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', jim_is_experienced)).
% 2.25/2.46 fof(c7,negated_conjecture,(~s__more_experienced(jim,geoff)),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[jim_is_experienced])).
% 2.25/2.46 fof(c8,negated_conjecture,~s__more_experienced(jim,geoff),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c7])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c9,negated_conjecture,~s__more_experienced(jim,geoff),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c8])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c4,axiom,X37!=X39|X38!=X36|~s__more_experienced(X37,X38)|s__more_experienced(X39,X36),theory(equality)).
% 2.25/2.46 fof(jim_human,axiom,s__Human(jim),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', jim_human)).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c27,plain,s__Human(jim),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[jim_human])).
% 2.25/2.46 fof(jim_54,axiom,s__age(jim,n54),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', jim_54)).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c14,plain,s__age(jim,n54),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[jim_54])).
% 2.25/2.46 fof(greater_54_48,axiom,greater(n54,n48),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', greater_54_48)).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c13,plain,greater(n54,n48),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[greater_54_48])).
% 2.25/2.46 fof(experience,axiom,(![O]:(![OAge]:(![YAge]:(s__Human(O)=>(((s__age(O,OAge)&s__age(s__siblingFn(O),YAge))&greater(OAge,YAge))=>(s__more_experienced(O,s__siblingFn(O))|s__has_seen_more(s__siblingFn(O),O))))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', experience)).
% 2.25/2.46 fof(c19,plain,(![O]:(![OAge]:(![YAge]:(~s__Human(O)|(((~s__age(O,OAge)|~s__age(s__siblingFn(O),YAge))|~greater(OAge,YAge))|(s__more_experienced(O,s__siblingFn(O))|s__has_seen_more(s__siblingFn(O),O))))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[experience])).
% 2.25/2.46 fof(c20,plain,(![O]:(~s__Human(O)|((![OAge]:(![YAge]:((~s__age(O,OAge)|~s__age(s__siblingFn(O),YAge))|~greater(OAge,YAge))))|(s__more_experienced(O,s__siblingFn(O))|s__has_seen_more(s__siblingFn(O),O))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c19])).
% 2.25/2.46 fof(c22,plain,(![X4]:(![X5]:(![X6]:(~s__Human(X4)|(((~s__age(X4,X5)|~s__age(s__siblingFn(X4),X6))|~greater(X5,X6))|(s__more_experienced(X4,s__siblingFn(X4))|s__has_seen_more(s__siblingFn(X4),X4))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c21,plain,(![X4]:(~s__Human(X4)|((![X5]:(![X6]:((~s__age(X4,X5)|~s__age(s__siblingFn(X4),X6))|~greater(X5,X6))))|(s__more_experienced(X4,s__siblingFn(X4))|s__has_seen_more(s__siblingFn(X4),X4))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c20])).])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c23,plain,~s__Human(X54)|~s__age(X54,X52)|~s__age(s__siblingFn(X54),X53)|~greater(X52,X53)|s__more_experienced(X54,s__siblingFn(X54))|s__has_seen_more(s__siblingFn(X54),X54),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c22])).
% 2.25/2.46 fof(geoff_48,axiom,s__age(geoff,n48),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', geoff_48)).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c15,plain,s__age(geoff,n48),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[geoff_48])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c6,axiom,X45!=X47|X46!=X44|~s__age(X45,X46)|s__age(X47,X44),theory(equality)).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c79,plain,geoff!=X59|n48!=X58|s__age(X59,X58),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c6, c15])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c107,plain,geoff!=X62|s__age(X62,n48),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c79, reflexivity])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c109,plain,s__age(s__siblingFn(jim),n48),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c107, c12])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c112,plain,~s__Human(jim)|~s__age(jim,X70)|~greater(X70,n48)|s__more_experienced(jim,s__siblingFn(jim))|s__has_seen_more(s__siblingFn(jim),jim),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c109, c23])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c211,plain,~s__Human(jim)|~s__age(jim,n54)|s__more_experienced(jim,s__siblingFn(jim))|s__has_seen_more(s__siblingFn(jim),jim),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c112, c13])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c489,plain,~s__Human(jim)|s__more_experienced(jim,s__siblingFn(jim))|s__has_seen_more(s__siblingFn(jim),jim),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c211, c14])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c839,plain,s__more_experienced(jim,s__siblingFn(jim))|s__has_seen_more(s__siblingFn(jim),jim),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c489, c27])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c840,plain,s__has_seen_more(s__siblingFn(jim),jim)|jim!=X238|s__siblingFn(jim)!=X237|s__more_experienced(X238,X237),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c839, c4])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c1461,plain,s__has_seen_more(s__siblingFn(jim),jim)|jim!=X239|s__more_experienced(X239,geoff),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c840, c47])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c1475,plain,s__has_seen_more(s__siblingFn(jim),jim)|s__more_experienced(jim,geoff),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1461, reflexivity])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c1478,plain,s__has_seen_more(s__siblingFn(jim),jim),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1475, c9])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c1479,plain,s__siblingFn(jim)!=X241|jim!=X240|s__has_seen_more(X241,X240),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1478, c5])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c1481,plain,jim!=X242|s__has_seen_more(geoff,X242),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1479, c47])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c1495,plain,s__has_seen_more(geoff,jim),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1481, reflexivity])).
% 2.25/2.46 cnf(c1497,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1495, c11])).
% 2.25/2.46 % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 2.25/2.46
% 2.25/2.46 % Initial clauses : 24
% 2.25/2.46 % Processed clauses : 360
% 2.25/2.46 % Factors computed : 1
% 2.25/2.46 % Resolvents computed: 1459
% 2.25/2.46 % Tautologies deleted: 4
% 2.25/2.46 % Forward subsumed : 778
% 2.25/2.46 % Backward subsumed : 28
% 2.25/2.46 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 2.25/2.46 % User time : 2.075 s
% 2.25/2.46 % System time : 0.018 s
% 2.25/2.46 % Total time : 2.093 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------