TSTP Solution File: CSR147+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : CSR147+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:52:51 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.71s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.20 % Problem : CSR147+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.22 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.10/0.43 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.43 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.43 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 08:57:24 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.66 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.70 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.70 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.15/0.70 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.70 % Transform :cnf
% 0.15/0.70 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.15/0.70 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.15/0.70
% 0.15/0.70 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.15/0.70 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.15/0.70 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.71 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.71 % File : CSR147+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.15/0.71 % Domain : Commonsense Reasoning
% 0.15/0.71 % Problem : My experienced brother
% 0.15/0.71 % Version : Especial.
% 0.15/0.71 % English : An older human sibling is more experienced than a younger one, or
% 0.15/0.71 % the younger one has seen more of the world.
% 0.15/0.71
% 0.15/0.71 % Refs :
% 0.15/0.71 % Source : [TPTP]
% 0.15/0.71 % Names :
% 0.15/0.71
% 0.15/0.71 % Status : Theorem
% 0.15/0.71 % Rating : 0.08 v8.1.0, 0.06 v7.4.0, 0.07 v7.2.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.04 v6.1.0, 0.10 v6.0.0, 0.04 v5.4.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.15 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.1.0
% 0.15/0.71 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% 0.15/0.71 % Number of atoms : 24 ( 3 equ)
% 0.15/0.71 % Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 1 avg)
% 0.15/0.71 % Number of connectives : 11 ( 1 ~; 1 |; 3 &)
% 0.15/0.71 % ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.15/0.71 % Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% 0.15/0.71 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.15/0.71 % Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.15/0.71 % Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.15/0.71 % Number of variables : 9 ( 7 !; 2 ?)
% 0.15/0.71 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.15/0.71
% 0.15/0.71 % Comments :
% 0.15/0.71 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.71 fof(human_type,axiom,
% 0.15/0.71 ? [A] : s__Human(A) ).
% 0.15/0.71
% 0.15/0.71 fof(living_type,axiom,
% 0.15/0.71 ? [A] : s__LivingThing(A) ).
% 0.15/0.71
% 0.15/0.71 fof(humans_are_living,axiom,
% 0.15/0.71 ! [A] :
% 0.15/0.71 ( s__Human(A)
% 0.15/0.71 => s__LivingThing(A) ) ).
% 0.15/0.71
% 0.15/0.71 fof(geoff_human,axiom,
% 0.15/0.71 s__Human(geoff) ).
% 0.15/0.71
% 0.15/0.71 fof(jim_human,axiom,
% 0.15/0.71 s__Human(jim) ).
% 0.15/0.71
% 0.15/0.71 fof(sibling_type,axiom,
% 0.15/0.71 ! [A] :
% 0.15/0.71 ( s__Human(A)
% 0.15/0.71 => s__Human(s__siblingFn(A)) ) ).
% 0.15/0.71
% 0.15/0.71 fof(experience,axiom,
% 0.15/0.71 ! [O,OAge,YAge] :
% 0.15/0.71 ( s__Human(O)
% 0.15/0.71 => ( ( s__age(O,OAge)
% 0.15/0.71 & s__age(s__siblingFn(O),YAge)
% 0.15/0.71 & greater(OAge,YAge) )
% 0.15/0.71 => ( s__more_experienced(O,s__siblingFn(O))
% 0.15/0.71 | s__has_seen_more(s__siblingFn(O),O) ) ) ) ).
% 0.15/0.71
% 0.15/0.71 fof(sibling_symmetry,axiom,
% 0.15/0.71 ! [X,Y] :
% 0.15/0.71 ( ( s__Human(X)
% 0.15/0.71 & s__Human(Y) )
% 0.15/0.71 => ( X = s__siblingFn(Y)
% 0.15/0.71 => Y = s__siblingFn(X) ) ) ).
% 0.15/0.71
% 0.15/0.71 fof(geoff_48,axiom,
% 0.15/0.71 s__age(geoff,n48) ).
% 0.15/0.71
% 0.15/0.71 fof(jim_54,axiom,
% 0.15/0.71 s__age(jim,n54) ).
% 0.15/0.71
% 0.15/0.71 fof(greater_54_48,axiom,
% 0.15/0.71 greater(n54,n48) ).
% 0.15/0.71
% 0.15/0.71 fof(geoff_and_jim,axiom,
% 0.15/0.71 geoff = s__siblingFn(jim) ).
% 0.15/0.71
% 0.15/0.71 fof(jim_has_seen_more,axiom,
% 0.15/0.71 ~ s__has_seen_more(geoff,jim) ).
% 0.15/0.71
% 0.15/0.71 fof(jim_is_experienced,conjecture,
% 0.15/0.71 s__more_experienced(jim,geoff) ).
% 0.15/0.71
% 0.15/0.71 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.71 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.71 % Proof found
% 0.15/0.71 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.71 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.15/0.73 %ClaNum:28(EqnAxiom:14)
% 0.15/0.73 %VarNum:21(SingletonVarNum:7)
% 0.15/0.73 %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.15/0.73 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.15/0.73 %SharedTerms:17
% 0.15/0.73 %goalClause: 23
% 0.15/0.73 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.15/0.73 [16]P1(a2)
% 0.15/0.73 [17]P1(a1)
% 0.15/0.73 [18]P1(a3)
% 0.15/0.73 [19]P3(a4)
% 0.15/0.73 [20]P4(a2,a6)
% 0.15/0.73 [21]P4(a1,a7)
% 0.15/0.73 [22]P2(a7,a6)
% 0.15/0.73 [23]~P5(a1,a2)
% 0.15/0.73 [24]~P6(a2,a1)
% 0.15/0.73 [15]E(f5(a1),a2)
% 0.15/0.73 [25]~P1(x251)+P3(x251)
% 0.15/0.73 [26]~P1(x261)+P1(f5(x261))
% 0.15/0.73 [27]~P1(x271)+~P1(x272)+~E(x272,f5(x271))+E(x271,f5(x272))
% 0.15/0.73 [28]~P1(x281)+~P4(x281,x282)+~P2(x282,x283)+P6(f5(x281),x281)+~P4(f5(x281),x283)+P5(x281,f5(x281))
% 0.15/0.73 %EqnAxiom
% 0.15/0.73 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.15/0.73 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.15/0.73 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.15/0.73 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f5(x41),f5(x42))
% 0.15/0.73 [5]~P1(x51)+P1(x52)+~E(x51,x52)
% 0.15/0.73 [6]P4(x62,x63)+~E(x61,x62)+~P4(x61,x63)
% 0.15/0.73 [7]P4(x73,x72)+~E(x71,x72)+~P4(x73,x71)
% 0.15/0.73 [8]P2(x82,x83)+~E(x81,x82)+~P2(x81,x83)
% 0.15/0.73 [9]P2(x93,x92)+~E(x91,x92)+~P2(x93,x91)
% 0.15/0.73 [10]~P3(x101)+P3(x102)+~E(x101,x102)
% 0.15/0.73 [11]P5(x112,x113)+~E(x111,x112)+~P5(x111,x113)
% 0.15/0.73 [12]P5(x123,x122)+~E(x121,x122)+~P5(x123,x121)
% 0.15/0.73 [13]P6(x132,x133)+~E(x131,x132)+~P6(x131,x133)
% 0.15/0.73 [14]P6(x143,x142)+~E(x141,x142)+~P6(x143,x141)
% 0.15/0.73
% 0.15/0.73 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.75 cnf(30,plain,
% 0.15/0.75 (P4(f5(a1),a6)),
% 0.15/0.75 inference(scs_inference,[],[20,15,2,6])).
% 0.15/0.75 cnf(40,plain,
% 0.15/0.75 (~P6(f5(a1),a1)),
% 0.15/0.75 inference(scs_inference,[],[16,17,20,24,15,2,6,5,27,25,26,4,14,13])).
% 0.15/0.75 cnf(41,plain,
% 0.15/0.75 (~P5(a1,f5(a1))),
% 0.15/0.75 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,16,17,20,24,15,2,6,5,27,25,26,4,14,13,12])).
% 0.15/0.75 cnf(51,plain,
% 0.15/0.75 ($false),
% 0.15/0.75 inference(scs_inference,[],[21,22,17,30,40,41,28]),
% 0.15/0.75 ['proof']).
% 0.15/0.75 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.15/0.75 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------