TSTP Solution File: CSR140^2 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : CSR140^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:35:49 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.39s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : CSR140^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.15/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sun May 19 00:44:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.36 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.38 % (20842)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (20843)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (20846)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (20844)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (20845)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (20847)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (20848)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (20849)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (20846)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.38 % (20846)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (20846)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.38 % (20846)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.38 % (20846)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 % (20846)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.22/0.38 % (20846)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.38 % (20846)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.38 % (20846)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (20846)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (20845)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.38 % (20845)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (20845)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.38 % (20845)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.38 % (20845)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 % (20845)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.22/0.38 % (20845)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.38 % (20845)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.22/0.38 % (20845)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (20845)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (20849)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.38 % (20849)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (20849)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.38 % (20849)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.38 % (20849)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 % (20849)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.22/0.38 % (20849)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.38 % (20849)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.22/0.38 % (20849)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (20849)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (20843)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.38 % (20843)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (20843)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.38 % (20843)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.38 % (20843)Termination phase: Preprocessing 3
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 % (20843)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.22/0.38 % (20843)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.38 % (20843)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.22/0.38 % (20843)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (20843)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (20844)First to succeed.
% 0.22/0.39 % (20844)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.39 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.39 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.39 thf(func_def_0, type, num: $tType).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(func_def_2, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIiioIiioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(func_def_3, type, domain_THFTYPE_IiiioI: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(func_def_5, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(func_def_6, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(func_def_7, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiooIioI: ($i > $o > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(func_def_8, type, instance_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(func_def_18, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(func_def_21, type, parent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(func_def_22, type, range_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(func_def_23, type, subclass_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(func_def_24, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IIioIIioIoI: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(func_def_25, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(func_def_28, type, vEPSILON: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > $o) > X0)).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(func_def_31, type, sK0: $i > $i).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(func_def_33, type, ph2: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f231,plain,(
% 0.22/0.39 $false),
% 0.22/0.39 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f229])).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f229,plain,(
% 0.22/0.39 ($true = $false)),
% 0.22/0.39 inference(superposition,[],[f217,f226])).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f226,plain,(
% 0.22/0.39 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true = (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))) )),
% 0.22/0.39 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f224])).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f224,plain,(
% 0.22/0.39 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != $true) | ($true = (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))) )),
% 0.22/0.39 inference(superposition,[],[f222,f202])).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f202,plain,(
% 0.22/0.39 ((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 0.22/0.39 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f103])).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f103,plain,(
% 0.22/0.39 ((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 0.22/0.39 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f102])).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f102,plain,(
% 0.22/0.39 (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)),
% 0.22/0.39 inference(rectify,[],[f13])).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f13,axiom,(
% 0.22/0.39 (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)),
% 0.22/0.39 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_012)).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f222,plain,(
% 0.22/0.39 ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $i > $o] : (((X1 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) != $true) | ((X1 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) = $true)) )),
% 0.22/0.39 inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f211])).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f211,plain,(
% 0.22/0.39 ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $i > $o] : (($true != (~ (X1 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))) | ((X1 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) != $true)) )),
% 0.22/0.39 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f144])).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f144,plain,(
% 0.22/0.39 ! [X0,X1 : $i > $i > $o,X2] : (((X1 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) != $true) | ($true != (~ (X1 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))))),
% 0.22/0.39 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f67])).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f67,plain,(
% 0.22/0.39 ~? [X1 : $i > $i > $o,X0,X2] : (((X1 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) = $true) & ($true = (~ (X1 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))))),
% 0.22/0.39 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f66])).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f66,plain,(
% 0.22/0.39 ~? [X0,X1 : $i > $i > $o,X2] : ((X1 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) & (~ (X1 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))),
% 0.22/0.39 inference(rectify,[],[f46])).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f46,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.22/0.39 ~? [X0,X21 : $i > $i > $o,X1] : ((X21 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) & (~ (X21 @ X1 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))),
% 0.22/0.39 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f45])).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f45,conjecture,(
% 0.22/0.39 ? [X0,X21 : $i > $i > $o,X1] : ((X21 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) & (~ (X21 @ X1 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))),
% 0.22/0.39 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con)).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f217,plain,(
% 0.22/0.39 ((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) = $false)),
% 0.22/0.39 inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f189])).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f189,plain,(
% 0.22/0.39 ((~ (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
% 0.22/0.39 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117])).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f117,plain,(
% 0.22/0.39 ((~ (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
% 0.22/0.39 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f116])).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f116,plain,(
% 0.22/0.39 (~ (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.22/0.39 inference(rectify,[],[f26])).
% 0.22/0.39 thf(f26,axiom,(
% 0.22/0.39 (~ (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.22/0.39 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_025)).
% 0.22/0.39 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.39 % (20844)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (20844)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.39 % (20844)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 % (20844)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.22/0.39 % (20844)Time elapsed: 0.012 s
% 0.22/0.39 % (20844)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.22/0.39 % (20844)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (20844)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (20841)Success in time 0.013 s
% 0.22/0.39 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------