TSTP Solution File: CSR138^1 by Leo-III---1.7.15

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.15
% Problem  : CSR138^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d THM

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 05:24:59 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 4.95s 2.24s
% Output   : Refutation 4.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   23
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   47 (  25 unt;  13 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   64 (  21 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  133 (  29   ~;  13   |;   9   &;  82   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   30 (  30   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   15 (  12 usr;  12 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (  30   ^  14   !;  17   ?;  61   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(num_type,type,
    num: $tType ).

thf(lAnna_THFTYPE_i_type,type,
    lAnna_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lBen_THFTYPE_i_type,type,
    lBen_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i_type,type,
    lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lBob_THFTYPE_i_type,type,
    lBob_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i_type,type,
    lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i_type,type,
    lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI_type,type,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI_type,type,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk1_type,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk2_type,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk3_type,type,
    sk3: $i ).

thf(sk4_type,type,
    sk4: $i ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ? [A: $i > $i > $o,B: $i > $i > $o,C: $i] :
      ( ( B @ C @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
      & ( A @ C @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
      & ( B
       != ( ^ [D: $i,E: $i] : $true ) )
      & ( A
       != ( ^ [D: $i,E: $i] : $true ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [A: $i > $i > $o,B: $i > $i > $o,C: $i] :
        ( ( B @ C @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( A @ C @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( B
         != ( ^ [D: $i,E: $i] : $true ) )
        & ( A
         != ( ^ [D: $i,E: $i] : $true ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i > $i > $o,B: $i > $i > $o,C: $i] :
        ( ( B @ C @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( A @ C @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
        & ( B
         != ( ^ [D: $i,E: $i] : $true ) )
        & ( A
         != ( ^ [D: $i,E: $i] : $true ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i > $i > $o,A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( B @ C @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
      | ~ ( A @ C @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
      | ( B
        = ( ^ [D: $i,E: $i] : $true ) )
      | ( A
        = ( ^ [D: $i,E: $i] : $true ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[12]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i > $i > $o,A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( B
        = ( ^ [D: $i,E: $i] : $true ) )
      | ( A
        = ( ^ [D: $i,E: $i] : $true ) )
      | ~ ( B @ C @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
      | ~ ( A @ C @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ? [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ B ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_003) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ? [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ B ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax) ).

thf(15,plain,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(46,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i > $i > $o,A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( B
        = ( ^ [D: $i,E: $i] : $true ) )
      | ( A
        = ( ^ [D: $i,E: $i] : $true ) )
      | ~ ( A @ C @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i )
      | ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
       != ( B @ C @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[15,14]) ).

thf(74,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( ^ [B: $i,C: $i] : ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ B @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
        = ( ^ [B: $i,C: $i] : $true ) )
      | ( A
        = ( ^ [B: $i,C: $i] : $true ) )
      | ~ ( A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[46:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( ^ [D: $i] : ^ [E: $i] : ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ D @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )),bind(C,$thf( lSue_THFTYPE_i ))]]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ? [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ B ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_002) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ? [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ B ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_005) ).

thf(24,plain,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_006) ).

thf(25,plain,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ B ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ sk3 @ sk4 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[21]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_008) ).

thf(27,plain,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_001) ).

thf(16,plain,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ sk3 @ sk4 )
   != ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[15,22]) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ( ( sk3 != lSue_THFTYPE_i )
    | ( sk4 != lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_007) ).

thf(26,plain,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_004) ).

thf(23,plain,
    parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBen_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ sk3 @ sk4 )
   != ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[16,22]) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ( ( sk3 != lMary_THFTYPE_i )
    | ( sk4 != lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ B ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ~ ( parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ sk1 @ sk2 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[18]) ).

thf(218,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[14,20,74,17,12,15,24,25,22,27,16,31,26,23,30,19]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : CSR138^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 00:13:25 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.99/0.89  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.12/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (107ms). 
% 1.34/1.01  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.67/1.21  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.75/1.21  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.83/1.27  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 9 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.83/1.29  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 9 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.83/1.30  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 1.83/1.30  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.83/1.30  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.95/2.24  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.95/2.24  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.95/2.24  % Time passed: 1707ms (effective reasoning time: 1233ms)
% 4.95/2.24  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.95/2.24  % Axioms used in derivation (9): ax_007, ax_003, ax_002, ax_005, ax, ax_008, ax_004, ax_006, ax_001
% 4.95/2.24  % No. of inferences in proof: 34
% 4.95/2.24  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1707 ms resp. 1233 ms w/o parsing
% 4.95/2.27  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.95/2.27  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------