TSTP Solution File: CSR128_8 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR128_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:34:34 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem    : CSR128_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.04/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 15:07:23 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.CVpcOSYjSM/E---3.1_22400.p
% 0.22/0.51  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.22/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # sh5l with pid 22485 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.22/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/0.51  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 22489 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.22/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/0.51  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.51  
% 0.22/0.51  # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.51  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_22, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: ($i * $o) > $o).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_23, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_24, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_25, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_26, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_27, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i * $i) > $o).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_28, type, n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.22/0.51  fof(ax_001, axiom, ![X1]:(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X1)=>likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.CVpcOSYjSM/E---3.1_22400.p', ax_001)).
% 0.22/0.51  fof(con, conjecture, ?[X2, X3]:(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X2,likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X3))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.CVpcOSYjSM/E---3.1_22400.p', con)).
% 0.22/0.51  fof(ax, axiom, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.CVpcOSYjSM/E---3.1_22400.p', ax)).
% 0.22/0.51  fof(c_0_3, axiom, ![X1]:(((~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X1)=>likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X1)))|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X1)=>likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X1))|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false)))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_001])).
% 0.22/0.51  fof(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X2, X3]:(((~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X3)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X2,$true))&(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X3)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X2,$false))))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])])).
% 0.22/0.51  fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X6]:((((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X6)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$true))&(~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X6)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$true)))&(~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X6)|likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X6)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])).
% 0.22/0.51  fof(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X4, X5]:((((~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X5)|likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X5))&(~holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X4,$false)|likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X5)))&((~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X5)|~holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X4,$true))&(~holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X4,$false)|~holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X4,$true))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])).
% 0.22/0.51  fof(c_0_7, axiom, ((~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$true))&(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_8, plain, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$true)|~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X1)|~holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X2,$true)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
% 0.22/0.51  fof(c_0_10, plain, ((~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$true))&(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X2)|~holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X1,$false)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_12, plain, (~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X1)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_13, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,X1)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false)|~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_14, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (~holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(X1,$false)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_16, plain, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false)|~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X1)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_12])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_17, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_18, plain, (~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,X1)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_15])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_19, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18]), ['proof']).
% 0.22/0.51  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.22/0.51  # Parsed axioms                        : 11
% 0.22/0.51  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 8
% 0.22/0.51  # Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.22/0.51  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.22/0.51  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
% 0.22/0.51  # Processed clauses                    : 15
% 0.22/0.51  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # ...remaining for further processing  : 15
% 0.22/0.51  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.22/0.51  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.22/0.51  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.22/0.51  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.22/0.51  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.22/0.51  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.22/0.51  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  # Current number of processed clauses  : 4
% 0.22/0.51  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.22/0.51  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.22/0.51  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.22/0.51  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2
% 0.22/0.51  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 11
% 0.22/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.22/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.22/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.22/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.22/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.22/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.22/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 520
% 0.22/0.51  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 69
% 0.22/0.51  
% 0.22/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.51  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.22/0.51  
% 0.22/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.22/0.51  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.22/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.52  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------