TSTP Solution File: CSR124^1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : CSR124^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:35:41 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.35s
% Output : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : CSR124^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 19 00:23:37 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.33 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.12/0.33 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35 % (9997)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (9994)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (9996)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (9995)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (9991)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (9993)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (9992)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (9998)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (9997)First to succeed.
% 0.12/0.35 % (9994)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.12/0.35 % (9994)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35 % (9994)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.12/0.35 % (9994)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.12/0.35 % (9994)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.12/0.35 % (9995)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.12/0.35 % (9995)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35 % (9995)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.12/0.35 % (9995)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.12/0.35 % (9995)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 % (9995)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.12/0.35 % (9995)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.35 % (9995)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.12/0.35 % (9995)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35 % (9995)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 % (9994)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.12/0.35 % (9994)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.35 % (9994)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.12/0.35 % (9994)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35 % (9994)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35 % (9996)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.12/0.35 % (9997)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.35 thf(func_def_0, type, num: $tType).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(func_def_1, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(func_def_5, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(func_def_6, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(f18,plain,(
% 0.12/0.35 $false),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f15,f17])).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(f17,plain,(
% 0.12/0.35 ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) != $true)),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f16])).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(f16,plain,(
% 0.12/0.35 ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & $true)) != $true)),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f13,f14])).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.12/0.35 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.12/0.35 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f8])).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.12/0.35 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(rectify,[],[f1])).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(f1,axiom,(
% 0.12/0.35 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 0.12/0.35 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax)).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.12/0.35 ($true != (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12])).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.12/0.35 ($true != (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(flattening,[],[f7])).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.12/0.35 ~($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6])).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.12/0.35 ~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(rectify,[],[f4])).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(f4,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.12/0.35 ~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3])).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(f3,conjecture,(
% 0.12/0.35 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.12/0.35 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con)).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(f15,plain,(
% 0.12/0.35 ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.12/0.35 ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f10])).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.12/0.35 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.12/0.35 thf(f2,axiom,(
% 0.12/0.35 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.12/0.35 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_001)).
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.35 % (9997)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35 % (9997)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.12/0.35 % (9997)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 % (9997)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.12/0.35 % (9997)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.35 % (9997)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.12/0.35 % (9997)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35 % (9997)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35 % (9990)Success in time 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.36 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------