TSTP Solution File: CSR124^1 by Duper---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : CSR124^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 21:11:56 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.57s 3.74s
% Output   : Proof 3.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : CSR124^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 28 07:36:54 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.57/3.74  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.57/3.74  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.57/3.74    (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i)
% 3.57/3.74      (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i))
% 3.57/3.74    True
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.57/3.74    (Not
% 3.57/3.74      (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i)
% 3.57/3.74        (And (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i))))
% 3.57/3.74    True
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #3 (by identity loobHoist #[1]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) True) True)
% 3.57/3.74    (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) False)
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #4 (by identity boolHoist #[1]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True)
% 3.57/3.74    (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True)
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #5 (by clausification #[2]): Eq
% 3.57/3.74    (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i)
% 3.57/3.74      (And (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i)))
% 3.57/3.74    False
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #6 (by forward demodulation #[5, 0]): Eq
% 3.57/3.74    (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i)
% 3.57/3.74      (And True (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i)))
% 3.57/3.74    False
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #7 (by bool simp #[6]): Eq
% 3.57/3.74    (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i)
% 3.57/3.74      (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i))
% 3.57/3.74    False
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #8 (by identity loobHoist #[7]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) True) False)
% 3.57/3.74    (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) False)
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #9 (by identity boolHoist #[7]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) False)
% 3.57/3.74    (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True)
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #10 (by superposition #[9, 4]): Or (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True)
% 3.57/3.74    (Or (Eq False True) (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True))
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): Or (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True)
% 3.57/3.74    (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True)
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #12 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[11]): Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #13 (by backward demodulation #[12, 3]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) True) True) (Eq True False)
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #15 (by backward demodulation #[12, 8]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) True) False) (Eq True False)
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #17 (by clausification #[15]): Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) True) False
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #18 (by clausification #[13]): Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) True) True
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #19 (by superposition #[18, 17]): Eq True False
% 3.57/3.74  Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): False
% 3.57/3.74  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------