TSTP Solution File: CSR121^1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : CSR121^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:35:40 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.36s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : CSR121^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:23:07 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.12/0.34 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35 % (26922)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (26924)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (26920)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (26917)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (26923)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.12/0.36 % (26921)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.12/0.36 % (26918)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.12/0.36 % (26919)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.12/0.36 % (26922)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.12/0.36 % (26922)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (26922)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.12/0.36 % (26922)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 % (26922)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.12/0.36 % (26922)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.36 % (26922)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.12/0.36 % (26922)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (26922)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (26920)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.12/0.36 % (26920)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (26920)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.12/0.36 % (26920)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.12/0.36 % (26920)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 % (26920)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.12/0.36 % (26920)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.36 % (26920)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.12/0.36 % (26920)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (26920)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (26924)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.12/0.36 % (26924)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (26924)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.12/0.36 % (26924)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 % (26924)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.12/0.36 % (26924)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.36 % (26924)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.12/0.36 % (26924)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (26924)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (26921)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.12/0.36 % (26921)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (26921)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.12/0.36 % (26921)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.12/0.36 % (26921)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 % (26921)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.12/0.36 % (26921)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.36 % (26921)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.12/0.36 % (26921)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (26921)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (26919)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.12/0.36 % (26919)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (26919)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.12/0.36 % (26919)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 % (26919)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.12/0.36 % (26919)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.36 % (26919)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.12/0.36 % (26919)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (26919)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36 % (26917)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.36 % (26918)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.19/0.36 % (26918)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.36 % (26918)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.19/0.36 % (26918)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.19/0.36 % (26918)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 % (26918)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.19/0.36 % (26918)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.36 % (26918)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.19/0.36 % (26918)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.36 % (26918)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.36 % (26923)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.19/0.36 % (26917)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.36 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.36 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.36 thf(func_def_0, type, num: $tType).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(func_def_1, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(func_def_5, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(func_def_6, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(func_def_15, type, ph1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f80,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 $false),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f48,f77,f79])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f79,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 spl0_2 | ~spl0_4),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f78])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f78,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 $false | (spl0_2 | ~spl0_4)),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f37,f47])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f47,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0) = $true)) ) | ~spl0_4),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f46])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f46,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 spl0_4 <=> ! [X0] : ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0) = $true)),
% 0.19/0.36 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f37,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != $true) | spl0_2),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f36])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f36,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 spl0_2 <=> ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 0.19/0.36 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f77,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ~spl0_2),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f76])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f76,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 $false | ~spl0_2),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f74,f75])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f75,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ($true != (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) | ~spl0_2),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f71])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f71,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ($true != (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ($true & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))) | ~spl0_2),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(superposition,[],[f10,f38])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f38,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true) | ~spl0_2),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f36])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0))) != $true)) )),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ! [X0] : ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0))) != $true)),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ~? [X0] : ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0))) = $true)),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ~? [X0] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0))),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(rectify,[],[f3])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f3,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.19/0.36 ~? [X0] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0))),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f2,conjecture,(
% 0.19/0.36 ? [X0] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0))),
% 0.19/0.36 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con)).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f74,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) | ~spl0_2),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f73])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f73,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))) | ~spl0_2),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f72])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f72,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ ((~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) | $false)))) | ~spl0_2),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f70])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f70,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ ((~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) | (~ $true)))) = $true) | ~spl0_2),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(superposition,[],[f11,f38])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ ((~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) | (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))))),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ ((~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) | (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))))),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) | (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(rectify,[],[f1])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f1,axiom,(
% 0.19/0.36 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) | (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))),
% 0.19/0.36 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax)).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f48,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 spl0_4 | spl0_2),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f27,f36,f46])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f27,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0) = $true)) )),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f24])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f24,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) = $false) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0) = $true)) )),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f23])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f23,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0) = $true) | (((~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) | (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) = $false)) )),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f21])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f21,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true = ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0))) | (((~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) | (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) = $false)) )),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f14])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true = (~ ((~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) | (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))) | ($true = ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))) )),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f13])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((~ ((~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) | (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))) != ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))) )),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f12])).
% 0.19/0.36 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.19/0.36 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != $true) | ((~ ((~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) | (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))) != ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))) )),
% 0.19/0.36 inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f10,f11])).
% 0.19/0.36 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.36 % (26917)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.36 % (26917)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.19/0.36 % (26917)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 % (26917)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.19/0.36 % (26917)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.36 % (26917)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.19/0.36 % (26917)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.36 % (26917)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.36 % (26916)Success in time 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.36 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------