TSTP Solution File: CSR120_8 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : CSR120_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:35:40 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.62s 0.78s
% Output : Refutation 0.62s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 49 ( 9 unt; 4 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 237 ( 23 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 96 ( 41 ~; 43 |; 6 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 139 ( 137 fml; 2 var)
% Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 3 ( 2 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 15 ( 12 usr; 10 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 11 !; 3 ?; 8 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
num: $tType ).
tff(func_def_7,type,
bG0: $o ).
tff(func_def_8,type,
bG1: $i > $o ).
tff(pred_def_1,type,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: ( $i * $o ) > $o ).
tff(f78,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f30,f36,f49,f51,f77]) ).
tff(f77,plain,
( ~ spl2_1
| ~ spl2_2 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f76]) ).
tff(f76,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl2_1
| ~ spl2_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f73,f61]) ).
tff(f61,plain,
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$true)
| ~ spl2_1 ),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f16,f24]) ).
tff(f24,plain,
( ( $true = bG0 )
| ~ spl2_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f23]) ).
tff(f23,plain,
( spl2_1
<=> ( $true = bG0 ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_1])]) ).
tff(f16,plain,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),bG0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
tff(f7,plain,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),bG0),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f1,f6]) ).
tff(f6,plain,
( ~ ( ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
| ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i) )
<=> ( $true = bG0 ) ),
introduced(fool_formula_definition,[new_symbols(definition,[bG0])]) ).
tff(f1,axiom,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),
~ ( ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
| ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i) )),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax) ).
tff(f73,plain,
( ~ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$true)
| ~ spl2_2 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f15,f68]) ).
tff(f68,plain,
( ( $true = bG1(lSue_THFTYPE_i) )
| ~ spl2_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f17,f29]) ).
tff(f29,plain,
( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
| ~ spl2_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f27]) ).
tff(f27,plain,
( spl2_2
<=> likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_2])]) ).
tff(f17,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X0,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
| ( $true = bG1(X0) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
tff(f12,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X0,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
| ( $true != bG1(X0) ) )
& ( ( $true = bG1(X0) )
| ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X0,lBill_THFTYPE_i) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
tff(f8,plain,
! [X0] :
( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X0,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
<=> ( $true = bG1(X0) ) ),
introduced(fool_formula_definition,[new_symbols(definition,[bG1])]) ).
tff(f15,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ~ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),bG1(X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
tff(f10,plain,
! [X0] : ~ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),bG1(X0)),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
tff(f9,plain,
~ ? [X0] : holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),bG1(X0)),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3,f8]) ).
tff(f3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X0] : holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X0,lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2]) ).
tff(f2,conjecture,
? [X0] : holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X0,lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
tff(f51,plain,
( spl2_1
| spl2_2 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f50]) ).
tff(f50,plain,
( $false
| spl2_1
| spl2_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f28,f47]) ).
tff(f47,plain,
( ! [X0: $i] : likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X0,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
| spl2_1 ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f45]) ).
tff(f45,plain,
( ! [X0: $i] :
( ( $true != $true )
| likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X0,lBill_THFTYPE_i) )
| spl2_1 ),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f18,f44]) ).
tff(f44,plain,
( ! [X0: $i] : ( $true = bG1(X0) )
| spl2_1 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f41,f43]) ).
tff(f43,plain,
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false)
| spl2_1 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f39,f25]) ).
tff(f25,plain,
( ( $true != bG0 )
| spl2_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f23]) ).
tff(f39,plain,
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false)
| ( $true = bG0 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f16,f5]) ).
tff(f5,plain,
! [X0: $o] :
( ( $false = (X0) )
| ( $true = (X0) ) ),
introduced(fool_axiom,[]) ).
tff(f41,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false)
| ( $true = bG1(X0) ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f15,f5]) ).
tff(f18,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( $true != bG1(X0) )
| likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X0,lBill_THFTYPE_i) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
tff(f28,plain,
( ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
| spl2_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f27]) ).
tff(f49,plain,
( spl2_1
| spl2_3 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f48]) ).
tff(f48,plain,
( $false
| spl2_1
| spl2_3 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f47,f33]) ).
tff(f33,plain,
( ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
| spl2_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f32]) ).
tff(f32,plain,
( spl2_3
<=> likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_3])]) ).
tff(f36,plain,
( ~ spl2_3
| ~ spl2_2
| spl2_1 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f19,f23,f27,f32]) ).
tff(f19,plain,
( ( $true = bG0 )
| ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
| ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).
tff(f14,plain,
( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
& likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i) )
| ( $true != bG0 ) )
& ( ( $true = bG0 )
| ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
| ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f13]) ).
tff(f13,plain,
( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
& likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i) )
| ( $true != bG0 ) )
& ( ( $true = bG0 )
| ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
| ~ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
tff(f11,plain,
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
& likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i) )
<=> ( $true = bG0 ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
tff(f30,plain,
( ~ spl2_1
| spl2_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f21,f27,f23]) ).
tff(f21,plain,
( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)
| ( $true != bG0 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : CSR120_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:49:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.34 This is a TX0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.35 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/0.78 % (15676)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.54/0.78 % (15676)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (15676)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.78 % (15676)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.78 % (15676)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.78
% 0.54/0.78 % (15676)Memory used [KB]: 952
% 0.54/0.78 % (15676)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.54/0.78 % (15676)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.54/0.78 % (15671)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.54/0.78 % (15673)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.54/0.78 % (15676)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.78 % (15676)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.78 % (15672)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.54/0.78 % (15671)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (15671)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.78 % (15671)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.78 % (15671)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.78
% 0.54/0.78 % (15671)Memory used [KB]: 978
% 0.54/0.78 % (15671)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.54/0.78 % (15671)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.54/0.78 % (15671)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.78 % (15671)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.78 % (15673)First to succeed.
% 0.54/0.78 % (15678)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.54/0.78 % (15672)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.54/0.78 % (15678)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (15678)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.78 % (15678)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.78 % (15678)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.78
% 0.54/0.78 % (15678)Memory used [KB]: 949
% 0.54/0.78 % (15678)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.54/0.78 % (15678)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.54/0.78 % (15679)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/55Mi)
% 0.54/0.78 % (15678)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.78 % (15678)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.78 % (15673)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-15670"
% 0.62/0.78 % (15680)dis+3_25:4_sil=16000:sos=all:erd=off:i=50:s2at=4.0:bd=off:nm=60:sup=off:cond=on:av=off:ins=2:nwc=10.0:etr=on:to=lpo:s2agt=20:fd=off:bsr=unit_only:slsq=on:slsqr=28,19:awrs=converge:awrsf=500:tgt=ground:bs=unit_only_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/50Mi)
% 0.62/0.78 % (15673)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.62/0.78 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.62/0.78 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.62/0.78 % (15673)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.78 % (15673)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.62/0.78 % (15673)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.62/0.78
% 0.62/0.78 % (15673)Memory used [KB]: 991
% 0.62/0.78 % (15673)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.62/0.78 % (15673)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.62/0.78 % (15670)Success in time 0.428 s
% 0.62/0.78 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------