TSTP Solution File: CSR120_8 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR120_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:20:29 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : CSR120_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:49:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # sh5l with pid 3130 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.19/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.47 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 3137 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.47 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.47 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.19/0.47 tff(decl_22, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: ($i * $o) > $o).
% 0.19/0.47 tff(decl_23, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.19/0.47 tff(decl_24, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.19/0.47 tff(decl_25, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.19/0.47 tff(decl_26, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
% 0.19/0.47 tff(decl_27, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i * $i) > $o).
% 0.19/0.47 tff(decl_28, type, n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.19/0.47 fof(ax, axiom, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),~((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax)).
% 0.19/0.47 fof(con, conjecture, ?[X1]:(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X1,lBill_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', con)).
% 0.19/0.47 fof(c_0_2, plain, ((~(~((~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i))))|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$true))&(~((~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)))|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax])])).
% 0.19/0.47 fof(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1]:(((~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X1,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$true))&(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X1,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false))))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])])).
% 0.19/0.47 fof(c_0_4, plain, ((~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false))&(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])).
% 0.19/0.47 fof(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2]:((((~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X2,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X2,lBill_THFTYPE_i))&(~holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false)|likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X2,lBill_THFTYPE_i)))&((~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X2,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$true))&(~holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false)|~holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$true))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(c_0_6, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X1,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(c_0_8, plain, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$true)|~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(c_0_9, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lSue_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X1,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$true)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(c_0_11, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)|holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(c_0_12, plain, (~likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(lMary_THFTYPE_i,lBill_THFTYPE_i)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])]), c_0_10])).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(c_0_13, plain, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),$false)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI(X1,lBill_THFTYPE_i)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_13])])).
% 0.19/0.47 cnf(c_0_15, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_14])]), ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.47 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.19/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 10
% 0.19/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 8
% 0.19/0.47 # Initial clauses : 7
% 0.19/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.19/0.47 # Processed clauses : 9
% 0.19/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.19/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.19/0.47 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.19/0.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.19/0.47 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.19/0.47 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.19/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.19/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.19/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.19/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.19/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.19/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.19/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.19/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.19/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 379
% 0.19/0.47 # Search garbage collected termcells : 41
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.47 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.47 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1584 pages
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.47 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.47 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.19/0.47 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------