TSTP Solution File: CSR116+32 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR116+32 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.49s 2.68s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 19
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 47 ( 38 unt; 0 nHn; 47 RR)
% Number of literals : 152 ( 0 equ; 115 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 18 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 11 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 20 ( 20 usr; 20 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 54 ( 10 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_877,negated_conjecture,
( ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ rslt(X3,X4)
| ~ obj(X3,X5)
| ~ arg1(X4,X5)
| ~ arg2(X4,X1)
| ~ attr(X6,X7)
| ~ attr(X5,X8)
| ~ attr(X5,X9)
| ~ subs(X3,w__344hlen_1_2)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X8,eigenname_1_1)
| ~ sub(X9,familiename_1_1)
| ~ prop(X1,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ subr(X4,rprs_0)
| ~ val(X7,s__374dafrika_0)
| ~ val(X8,nelson_0)
| ~ val(X9,mandela_0)
| ~ pmod(X2,erst_1_1,pr__344sident_1_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_877) ).
cnf(i_0_367,hypothesis,
pmod(c303,erst_1_1,pr__344sident_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_367) ).
cnf(i_0_372,hypothesis,
val(c290,mandela_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_372) ).
cnf(i_0_373,hypothesis,
sub(c290,familiename_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_373) ).
cnf(i_0_374,hypothesis,
val(c289,nelson_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_374) ).
cnf(i_0_375,hypothesis,
sub(c289,eigenname_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_375) ).
cnf(i_0_356,hypothesis,
val(c319,s__374dafrika_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_356) ).
cnf(i_0_357,hypothesis,
sub(c319,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_357) ).
cnf(i_0_353,hypothesis,
subr(c322,rprs_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_353) ).
cnf(i_0_369,hypothesis,
prop(c301,schwarz_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_369) ).
cnf(i_0_354,hypothesis,
arg2(c322,c301),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_354) ).
cnf(i_0_368,hypothesis,
sub(c301,c303),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_368) ).
cnf(i_0_362,hypothesis,
subs(c309,w__344hlen_1_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_362) ).
cnf(i_0_364,hypothesis,
rslt(c309,c322),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_364) ).
cnf(i_0_377,hypothesis,
attr(c288,c290),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_377) ).
cnf(i_0_378,hypothesis,
attr(c288,c289),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_378) ).
cnf(i_0_355,hypothesis,
arg1(c322,c288),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_355) ).
cnf(i_0_365,hypothesis,
obj(c309,c288),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_365) ).
cnf(i_0_359,hypothesis,
attr(c318,c319),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g_h5qlzp/lgb.p',i_0_359) ).
cnf(c_0_897,negated_conjecture,
( ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ rslt(X3,X4)
| ~ obj(X3,X5)
| ~ arg1(X4,X5)
| ~ arg2(X4,X1)
| ~ attr(X6,X7)
| ~ attr(X5,X8)
| ~ attr(X5,X9)
| ~ subs(X3,w__344hlen_1_2)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X8,eigenname_1_1)
| ~ sub(X9,familiename_1_1)
| ~ prop(X1,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ subr(X4,rprs_0)
| ~ val(X7,s__374dafrika_0)
| ~ val(X8,nelson_0)
| ~ val(X9,mandela_0)
| ~ pmod(X2,erst_1_1,pr__344sident_1_1) ),
i_0_877 ).
cnf(c_0_898,hypothesis,
pmod(c303,erst_1_1,pr__344sident_1_1),
i_0_367 ).
cnf(c_0_899,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,mandela_0)
| ~ val(X2,nelson_0)
| ~ val(X3,s__374dafrika_0)
| ~ subr(X4,rprs_0)
| ~ prop(X5,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ subs(X6,w__344hlen_1_2)
| ~ attr(X7,X3)
| ~ attr(X8,X1)
| ~ attr(X8,X2)
| ~ arg2(X4,X5)
| ~ arg1(X4,X8)
| ~ obj(X6,X8)
| ~ rslt(X6,X4)
| ~ sub(X1,familiename_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,eigenname_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,c303) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_897,c_0_898]) ).
cnf(c_0_900,hypothesis,
val(c290,mandela_0),
i_0_372 ).
cnf(c_0_901,hypothesis,
sub(c290,familiename_1_1),
i_0_373 ).
cnf(c_0_902,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,nelson_0)
| ~ val(X2,s__374dafrika_0)
| ~ subr(X3,rprs_0)
| ~ prop(X4,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ subs(X5,w__344hlen_1_2)
| ~ attr(X6,c290)
| ~ attr(X7,X2)
| ~ attr(X6,X1)
| ~ arg2(X3,X4)
| ~ arg1(X3,X6)
| ~ obj(X5,X6)
| ~ rslt(X5,X3)
| ~ sub(X1,eigenname_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,c303) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_899,c_0_900]),c_0_901])]) ).
cnf(c_0_903,hypothesis,
val(c289,nelson_0),
i_0_374 ).
cnf(c_0_904,hypothesis,
sub(c289,eigenname_1_1),
i_0_375 ).
cnf(c_0_905,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,s__374dafrika_0)
| ~ subr(X2,rprs_0)
| ~ prop(X3,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ subs(X4,w__344hlen_1_2)
| ~ attr(X5,c290)
| ~ attr(X5,c289)
| ~ attr(X6,X1)
| ~ arg2(X2,X3)
| ~ arg1(X2,X5)
| ~ obj(X4,X5)
| ~ rslt(X4,X2)
| ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,c303) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_902,c_0_903]),c_0_904])]) ).
cnf(c_0_906,hypothesis,
val(c319,s__374dafrika_0),
i_0_356 ).
cnf(c_0_907,hypothesis,
sub(c319,name_1_1),
i_0_357 ).
cnf(c_0_908,hypothesis,
( ~ subr(X1,rprs_0)
| ~ prop(X2,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ subs(X3,w__344hlen_1_2)
| ~ attr(X4,c290)
| ~ attr(X4,c289)
| ~ attr(X5,c319)
| ~ arg2(X1,X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X4)
| ~ obj(X3,X4)
| ~ rslt(X3,X1)
| ~ sub(X2,c303) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_905,c_0_906]),c_0_907])]) ).
cnf(c_0_909,hypothesis,
subr(c322,rprs_0),
i_0_353 ).
cnf(c_0_910,hypothesis,
( ~ prop(X1,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ subs(X2,w__344hlen_1_2)
| ~ attr(X3,c290)
| ~ attr(X3,c289)
| ~ attr(X4,c319)
| ~ arg2(c322,X1)
| ~ arg1(c322,X3)
| ~ obj(X2,X3)
| ~ rslt(X2,c322)
| ~ sub(X1,c303) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_908,c_0_909]) ).
cnf(c_0_911,hypothesis,
prop(c301,schwarz_1_1),
i_0_369 ).
cnf(c_0_912,hypothesis,
arg2(c322,c301),
i_0_354 ).
cnf(c_0_913,hypothesis,
sub(c301,c303),
i_0_368 ).
cnf(c_0_914,hypothesis,
( ~ subs(X1,w__344hlen_1_2)
| ~ attr(X2,c290)
| ~ attr(X2,c289)
| ~ attr(X3,c319)
| ~ arg1(c322,X2)
| ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ rslt(X1,c322) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_910,c_0_911]),c_0_912]),c_0_913])]) ).
cnf(c_0_915,hypothesis,
subs(c309,w__344hlen_1_2),
i_0_362 ).
cnf(c_0_916,hypothesis,
rslt(c309,c322),
i_0_364 ).
cnf(c_0_917,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c290)
| ~ attr(X1,c289)
| ~ attr(X2,c319)
| ~ arg1(c322,X1)
| ~ obj(c309,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_914,c_0_915]),c_0_916])]) ).
cnf(c_0_918,hypothesis,
attr(c288,c290),
i_0_377 ).
cnf(c_0_919,hypothesis,
attr(c288,c289),
i_0_378 ).
cnf(c_0_920,hypothesis,
arg1(c322,c288),
i_0_355 ).
cnf(c_0_921,hypothesis,
obj(c309,c288),
i_0_365 ).
cnf(c_0_922,hypothesis,
attr(c318,c319),
i_0_359 ).
cnf(c_0_923,hypothesis,
~ attr(X1,c319),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_917,c_0_918]),c_0_919]),c_0_920]),c_0_921])]) ).
cnf(c_0_924,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_922,c_0_923]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : CSR116+32 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 16:06:26 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.43/0.61 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.43/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.43/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.49/2.68 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.49/2.68 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.49/2.68 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.49/2.68 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.49/2.68 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.49/2.68 #
% 7.49/2.68 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 7.49/2.68 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.49/2.68
% 7.49/2.68 # Proof found!
% 7.49/2.68 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.49/2.68 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.49/2.68 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.49/2.68
% 7.49/2.68 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.49/2.68 # User time : 0.032 s
% 7.49/2.68 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.49/2.68 # Total time : 0.037 s
% 7.49/2.68 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.49/2.68
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------