TSTP Solution File: CSR115+9 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+9 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.58s 2.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 33 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 33 RR)
% Number of literals : 68 ( 0 equ; 45 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 9 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 11 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 53 ( 33 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_810,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ prop(X2,britisch__1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-640naxe5/lgb.p',i_0_810) ).
cnf(i_0_295,hypothesis,
val(c57202,bmw_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-640naxe5/lgb.p',i_0_295) ).
cnf(i_0_296,hypothesis,
sub(c57202,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-640naxe5/lgb.p',i_0_296) ).
cnf(i_0_281,hypothesis,
prop(c58970,britisch__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-640naxe5/lgb.p',i_0_281) ).
cnf(i_0_280,hypothesis,
sub(c58970,firma_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-640naxe5/lgb.p',i_0_280) ).
cnf(i_0_298,hypothesis,
attr(c57201,c57202),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-640naxe5/lgb.p',i_0_298) ).
cnf(i_0_669,plain,
( obj(esk24_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X2,X1)
| ~ has_fact_leq(X2,real) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-640naxe5/lgb.p',i_0_669) ).
cnf(i_0_636,plain,
( has_fact_leq(X1,X2)
| ~ fact(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-640naxe5/lgb.p',i_0_636) ).
cnf(i_0_120,hypothesis,
fact(c58970,real),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-640naxe5/lgb.p',i_0_120) ).
cnf(i_0_768,plain,
( loc(X1,esk50_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ prop(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-640naxe5/lgb.p',i_0_768) ).
cnf(i_0_572,plain,
state_adjective_state_binding(britisch__1_1,grossbritannien_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-640naxe5/lgb.p',i_0_572) ).
cnf(i_0_275,hypothesis,
attr(c59035,c59036),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-640naxe5/lgb.p',i_0_275) ).
cnf(c_0_823,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ prop(X2,britisch__1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0) ),
i_0_810 ).
cnf(c_0_824,hypothesis,
val(c57202,bmw_0),
i_0_295 ).
cnf(c_0_825,hypothesis,
sub(c57202,name_1_1),
i_0_296 ).
cnf(c_0_826,hypothesis,
( ~ prop(X1,britisch__1_1)
| ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c57202)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ obj(X5,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_823,c_0_824]),c_0_825])]) ).
cnf(c_0_827,hypothesis,
prop(c58970,britisch__1_1),
i_0_281 ).
cnf(c_0_828,hypothesis,
sub(c58970,firma_1_1),
i_0_280 ).
cnf(c_0_829,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c57202)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ obj(X4,c58970) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_826,c_0_827]),c_0_828])]) ).
cnf(c_0_830,hypothesis,
attr(c57201,c57202),
i_0_298 ).
cnf(c_0_831,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ obj(X3,c58970) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_829,c_0_830]) ).
cnf(c_0_832,plain,
( obj(esk24_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X2,X1)
| ~ has_fact_leq(X2,real) ),
i_0_669 ).
cnf(c_0_833,plain,
( ~ has_fact_leq(c58970,real)
| ~ loc(c58970,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_831,c_0_832]) ).
cnf(c_0_834,plain,
( has_fact_leq(X1,X2)
| ~ fact(X1,X2) ),
i_0_636 ).
cnf(c_0_835,hypothesis,
fact(c58970,real),
i_0_120 ).
cnf(c_0_836,plain,
( ~ loc(c58970,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_833,c_0_834]),c_0_835])]) ).
cnf(c_0_837,plain,
( loc(X1,esk50_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ prop(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
i_0_768 ).
cnf(c_0_838,plain,
( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X1,X2)
| ~ prop(c58970,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_836,c_0_837]) ).
cnf(c_0_839,hypothesis,
( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(britisch__1_1,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_838,c_0_827]) ).
cnf(c_0_840,plain,
state_adjective_state_binding(britisch__1_1,grossbritannien_0),
i_0_572 ).
cnf(c_0_841,hypothesis,
attr(c59035,c59036),
i_0_275 ).
cnf(c_0_842,plain,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_839,c_0_840]) ).
cnf(c_0_843,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_841,c_0_842]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : CSR115+9 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.05/0.10 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 16:47:57 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.14/0.47 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.14/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.14/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.58/2.28 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.58/2.28 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.58/2.28 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.58/2.28 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.58/2.28 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.58/2.28 #
% 7.58/2.28 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 7.58/2.28 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.58/2.28
% 7.58/2.28 # Proof found!
% 7.58/2.28 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.58/2.28 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.58/2.28 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.58/2.28
% 7.58/2.28 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.58/2.28 # User time : 0.042 s
% 7.58/2.28 # System time : 0.007 s
% 7.58/2.28 # Total time : 0.049 s
% 7.58/2.28 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.58/2.28
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------