TSTP Solution File: CSR115+84 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+84 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:26 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.45s 2.79s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.45s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 31 RR)
% Number of literals : 75 ( 0 equ; 56 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 8 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 61 ( 24 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_880,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a5915ma8/lgb.p',i_0_880) ).
cnf(i_0_381,hypothesis,
sub(c20892,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a5915ma8/lgb.p',i_0_381) ).
cnf(i_0_374,hypothesis,
sub(c20907,jahr__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a5915ma8/lgb.p',i_0_374) ).
cnf(i_0_383,hypothesis,
attr(c20891,c20892),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a5915ma8/lgb.p',i_0_383) ).
cnf(i_0_377,hypothesis,
attr(c20905,c20907),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a5915ma8/lgb.p',i_0_377) ).
cnf(i_0_859,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a5915ma8/lgb.p',i_0_859) ).
cnf(i_0_876,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a5915ma8/lgb.p',i_0_876) ).
cnf(i_0_877,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a5915ma8/lgb.p',i_0_877) ).
cnf(i_0_878,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a5915ma8/lgb.p',i_0_878) ).
cnf(i_0_382,hypothesis,
sub(c20891,einrichtung_1_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a5915ma8/lgb.p',i_0_382) ).
cnf(c_0_891,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1) ),
i_0_880 ).
cnf(c_0_892,hypothesis,
sub(c20892,name_1_1),
i_0_381 ).
cnf(c_0_893,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,jahr__1_1)
| ~ attr(X3,c20892)
| ~ attr(X4,X1)
| ~ attr(X5,X2)
| ~ obj(X6,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_891,c_0_892]) ).
cnf(c_0_894,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,jahr__1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c20892)
| ~ attr(X3,c20892)
| ~ attr(X4,X1)
| ~ obj(X5,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_893,c_0_892]) ).
cnf(c_0_895,hypothesis,
sub(c20907,jahr__1_1),
i_0_374 ).
cnf(c_0_896,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c20892)
| ~ attr(X2,c20892)
| ~ attr(X3,c20907)
| ~ obj(X4,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_894,c_0_895]) ).
cnf(c_0_897,hypothesis,
attr(c20891,c20892),
i_0_383 ).
cnf(c_0_898,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c20892)
| ~ attr(X2,c20907)
| ~ obj(X3,c20891) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_896,c_0_897]) ).
cnf(c_0_899,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c20907)
| ~ obj(X2,c20891) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_898,c_0_897]) ).
cnf(c_0_900,hypothesis,
attr(c20905,c20907),
i_0_377 ).
cnf(c_0_901,hypothesis,
~ obj(X1,c20891),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_899,c_0_900]) ).
cnf(c_0_902,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
i_0_859 ).
cnf(c_0_903,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X1,X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,c20891) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_901,c_0_902]) ).
cnf(c_0_904,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_876 ).
cnf(c_0_905,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c20891)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_903,c_0_904]) ).
cnf(c_0_906,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_877 ).
cnf(c_0_907,plain,
( ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c20891)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_905,c_0_906]) ).
cnf(c_0_908,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_878 ).
cnf(c_0_909,hypothesis,
sub(c20891,einrichtung_1_2),
i_0_382 ).
cnf(c_0_910,plain,
~ sub(c20891,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_907,c_0_908]) ).
cnf(c_0_911,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_909,c_0_910]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CSR115+84 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 17:16:36 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.40/0.59 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.40/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.40/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.45/2.79 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.45/2.79 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.45/2.79 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.45/2.79 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.45/2.79 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.45/2.79 #
% 7.45/2.79 # Preprocessing time : 0.031 s
% 7.45/2.79 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.45/2.79
% 7.45/2.79 # Proof found!
% 7.45/2.79 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.45/2.79 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.45/2.79 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.45/2.79
% 7.45/2.79 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.45/2.79 # User time : 0.069 s
% 7.45/2.79 # System time : 0.010 s
% 7.45/2.79 # Total time : 0.080 s
% 7.45/2.79 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.45/2.79
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------