TSTP Solution File: CSR115+82 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR115+82 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:20:13 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 1.28s 0.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  146 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :  101 (   9 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  152 (  22   ~;  17   |; 112   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :  101 (  11 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   19 (  18 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   34 (  34 usr;  33 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   7 sgn  10   !;  13   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495,conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6] :
      ( attr(X1,X2)
      & attr(X4,X3)
      & attr(X5,X6)
      & sub(X2,name_1_1)
      & sub(X3,name_1_1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495) ).

fof(name_rel__attr_val_name_1_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( name(X2,X1)
     => ? [X3] :
          ( attr(X2,X3)
          & sub(X3,name_1_1)
          & val(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',name_rel__attr_val_name_1_1) ).

fof(ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495,hypothesis,
    ( attr(c341,c342)
    & sub(c341,mensch_1_1)
    & sub(c342,familiename_1_1)
    & val(c342,marzocchi_0)
    & name(c358,freeride_____344ra_0)
    & sub(c362,mountain_bike_1_1)
    & sub(c364,bereich_1_1)
    & benf(c368,c364)
    & exp(c368,c341)
    & loc(c368,c373)
    & mcont(c368,c358)
    & subs(c368,einl__344uten_1_1)
    & in(c373,c362)
    & sort(c341,d)
    & card(c341,int1)
    & etype(c341,int0)
    & fact(c341,real)
    & gener(c341,sp)
    & quant(c341,one)
    & refer(c341,det)
    & varia(c341,con)
    & sort(c342,na)
    & card(c342,int1)
    & etype(c342,int0)
    & fact(c342,real)
    & gener(c342,sp)
    & quant(c342,one)
    & refer(c342,indet)
    & varia(c342,varia_c)
    & sort(mensch_1_1,d)
    & card(mensch_1_1,int1)
    & etype(mensch_1_1,int0)
    & fact(mensch_1_1,real)
    & gener(mensch_1_1,ge)
    & quant(mensch_1_1,one)
    & refer(mensch_1_1,refer_c)
    & varia(mensch_1_1,varia_c)
    & sort(familiename_1_1,na)
    & card(familiename_1_1,int1)
    & etype(familiename_1_1,int0)
    & fact(familiename_1_1,real)
    & gener(familiename_1_1,ge)
    & quant(familiename_1_1,one)
    & refer(familiename_1_1,refer_c)
    & varia(familiename_1_1,varia_c)
    & sort(marzocchi_0,fe)
    & sort(c358,o)
    & card(c358,int1)
    & etype(c358,int0)
    & fact(c358,hypo)
    & gener(c358,sp)
    & quant(c358,one)
    & refer(c358,refer_c)
    & varia(c358,varia_c)
    & sort(freeride_____344ra_0,fe)
    & sort(c362,d)
    & card(c362,int1)
    & etype(c362,int0)
    & fact(c362,real)
    & gener(c362,sp)
    & quant(c362,one)
    & refer(c362,det)
    & varia(c362,con)
    & sort(mountain_bike_1_1,d)
    & card(mountain_bike_1_1,int1)
    & etype(mountain_bike_1_1,int0)
    & fact(mountain_bike_1_1,real)
    & gener(mountain_bike_1_1,ge)
    & quant(mountain_bike_1_1,one)
    & refer(mountain_bike_1_1,refer_c)
    & varia(mountain_bike_1_1,varia_c)
    & sort(c364,d)
    & card(c364,int1)
    & etype(c364,int0)
    & fact(c364,real)
    & gener(c364,sp)
    & quant(c364,one)
    & refer(c364,refer_c)
    & varia(c364,varia_c)
    & sort(bereich_1_1,d)
    & card(bereich_1_1,int1)
    & etype(bereich_1_1,int0)
    & fact(bereich_1_1,real)
    & gener(bereich_1_1,ge)
    & quant(bereich_1_1,one)
    & refer(bereich_1_1,refer_c)
    & varia(bereich_1_1,varia_c)
    & sort(c368,dn)
    & fact(c368,real)
    & gener(c368,sp)
    & sort(c373,l)
    & card(c373,int1)
    & etype(c373,int0)
    & fact(c373,real)
    & gener(c373,sp)
    & quant(c373,one)
    & refer(c373,det)
    & varia(c373,con)
    & sort(einl__344uten_1_1,dn)
    & fact(einl__344uten_1_1,real)
    & gener(einl__344uten_1_1,ge) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6] :
        ( attr(X1,X2)
        & attr(X4,X3)
        & attr(X5,X6)
        & sub(X2,name_1_1)
        & sub(X3,name_1_1) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13] :
      ( ~ attr(X8,X9)
      | ~ attr(X11,X10)
      | ~ attr(X12,X13)
      | ~ sub(X9,name_1_1)
      | ~ sub(X10,name_1_1) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X93,X94] :
      ( ( attr(X94,esk8_2(X93,X94))
        | ~ name(X94,X93) )
      & ( sub(esk8_2(X93,X94),name_1_1)
        | ~ name(X94,X93) )
      & ( val(esk8_2(X93,X94),X93)
        | ~ name(X94,X93) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[name_rel__attr_val_name_1_1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ attr(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X4,name_1_1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
    attr(c341,c342),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( attr(X1,esk8_2(X2,X1))
    | ~ name(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    name(c358,freeride_____344ra_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( sub(esk8_2(X1,X2),name_1_1)
    | ~ name(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X4,name_1_1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    attr(c358,esk8_2(freeride_____344ra_0,c358)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    sub(esk8_2(freeride_____344ra_0,c358),name_1_1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,X2)
    | ~ sub(X2,name_1_1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : CSR115+82 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 01:22:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/0.76  # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.28/0.76  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.28/0.76  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.28/0.76  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.28/0.76  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.28/0.76  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.28/0.76  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.28/0.76  # new_bool_3 with pid 2592 completed with status 0
% 1.28/0.76  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 1.28/0.76  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.28/0.76  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.28/0.76  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.28/0.76  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.28/0.76  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.28/0.76  # Search class: FHHNF-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.28/0.76  # partial match(1): FHHNS-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.28/0.76  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.28/0.76  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 1.28/0.76  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 2596 completed with status 0
% 1.28/0.76  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 1.28/0.76  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.28/0.76  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.28/0.76  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.28/0.76  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.28/0.76  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.28/0.76  # Search class: FHHNF-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.28/0.76  # partial match(1): FHHNS-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.28/0.76  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.28/0.76  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 1.28/0.76  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 1.28/0.76  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.28/0.76  
% 1.28/0.76  # Proof found!
% 1.28/0.76  # SZS status Theorem
% 1.28/0.76  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.28/0.76  # Parsed axioms                        : 10189
% 1.28/0.76  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 10125
% 1.28/0.76  # Initial clauses                      : 198
% 1.28/0.76  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.28/0.76  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 198
% 1.28/0.76  # Processed clauses                    : 497
% 1.28/0.76  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 1.28/0.76  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 1.28/0.76  # ...remaining for further processing  : 496
% 1.28/0.76  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1.28/0.76  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.28/0.76  # Backward-subsumed                    : 6
% 1.28/0.76  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 1.28/0.76  # Generated clauses                    : 116
% 1.28/0.76  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 114
% 1.28/0.76  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.28/0.76  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.28/0.76  # Paramodulations                      : 116
% 1.28/0.76  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.28/0.76  # NegExts                              : 0
% 1.28/0.76  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.28/0.76  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.28/0.76  # Total rewrite steps                  : 2
% 1.28/0.76  # ...of those cached                   : 1
% 1.28/0.76  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.28/0.76  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.28/0.76  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.28/0.76  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.28/0.76  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.28/0.76  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.28/0.76  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.28/0.76  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.28/0.76  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.28/0.76  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.28/0.76  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.28/0.76  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.28/0.76  # Current number of processed clauses  : 292
% 1.28/0.76  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 210
% 1.28/0.76  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.28/0.76  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 1.28/0.76  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 81
% 1.28/0.76  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13
% 1.28/0.76  # ...number of literals in the above   : 33
% 1.28/0.76  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.28/0.76  # Current number of archived clauses   : 204
% 1.28/0.76  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2621
% 1.28/0.76  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1404
% 1.28/0.76  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 1.28/0.76  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 947
% 1.28/0.76  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.28/0.76  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 1.28/0.76  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 1.28/0.76  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.28/0.76  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.28/0.76  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 52672
% 1.28/0.76  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 39202
% 1.28/0.76  
% 1.28/0.76  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.28/0.76  # User time                : 0.082 s
% 1.28/0.76  # System time              : 0.062 s
% 1.28/0.76  # Total time               : 0.143 s
% 1.28/0.76  # Maximum resident set size: 42464 pages
% 1.28/0.76  
% 1.28/0.76  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.28/0.76  # User time                : 0.176 s
% 1.28/0.76  # System time              : 0.077 s
% 1.28/0.76  # Total time               : 0.252 s
% 1.28/0.76  # Maximum resident set size: 10624 pages
% 1.28/0.76  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------