TSTP Solution File: CSR115+45 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR115+45 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.32s 2.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   66 (   0 equ;  47 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (  33 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_735,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ obj(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ val(X6,bmw_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ywfww2v/lgb.p',i_0_735) ).

cnf(i_0_214,hypothesis,
    val(c859,bmw_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ywfww2v/lgb.p',i_0_214) ).

cnf(i_0_215,hypothesis,
    sub(c859,name_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ywfww2v/lgb.p',i_0_215) ).

cnf(i_0_216,hypothesis,
    sub(c858,firma_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ywfww2v/lgb.p',i_0_216) ).

cnf(i_0_217,hypothesis,
    attr(c858,c859),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ywfww2v/lgb.p',i_0_217) ).

cnf(i_0_714,plain,
    ( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X3)
    | ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ywfww2v/lgb.p',i_0_714) ).

cnf(i_0_731,plain,
    ( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ywfww2v/lgb.p',i_0_731) ).

cnf(i_0_733,plain,
    ( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ywfww2v/lgb.p',i_0_733) ).

cnf(i_0_732,plain,
    ( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ywfww2v/lgb.p',i_0_732) ).

cnf(i_0_211,hypothesis,
    attr(c893,c894),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ywfww2v/lgb.p',i_0_211) ).

cnf(c_0_746,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ obj(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ val(X6,bmw_0) ),
    i_0_735 ).

cnf(c_0_747,hypothesis,
    val(c859,bmw_0),
    i_0_214 ).

cnf(c_0_748,hypothesis,
    sub(c859,name_1_1),
    i_0_215 ).

cnf(c_0_749,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
    | ~ attr(X2,c859)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ obj(X5,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_746,c_0_747]),c_0_748])]) ).

cnf(c_0_750,hypothesis,
    sub(c858,firma_1_1),
    i_0_216 ).

cnf(c_0_751,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,c859)
    | ~ attr(X2,X3)
    | ~ obj(X4,c858) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_749,c_0_750]) ).

cnf(c_0_752,hypothesis,
    attr(c858,c859),
    i_0_217 ).

cnf(c_0_753,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,X2)
    | ~ obj(X3,c858) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_751,c_0_752]) ).

cnf(c_0_754,plain,
    ( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X3)
    | ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
    i_0_714 ).

cnf(c_0_755,hypothesis,
    ( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,c858)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_753,c_0_754]) ).

cnf(c_0_756,plain,
    ( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_731 ).

cnf(c_0_757,plain,
    ( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c858)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X4,X5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_755,c_0_756]) ).

cnf(c_0_758,plain,
    ( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_733 ).

cnf(c_0_759,plain,
    ( ~ arg2(esk59_2(c858,X1),X2)
    | ~ sub(c858,X1)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_757,c_0_758]) ).

cnf(c_0_760,plain,
    ( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_732 ).

cnf(c_0_761,plain,
    ( ~ sub(c858,X1)
    | ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_759,c_0_760]) ).

cnf(c_0_762,hypothesis,
    attr(c893,c894),
    i_0_211 ).

cnf(c_0_763,hypothesis,
    ~ attr(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_761,c_0_750]) ).

cnf(c_0_764,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_762,c_0_763]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14  % Problem  : CSR115+45 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 15:12:26 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.47/0.64  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.64  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.47/0.64  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.47/0.64  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.32/2.72  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.32/2.72  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.32/2.72  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.32/2.72  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.32/2.72  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.32/2.72  #
% 7.32/2.72  # Preprocessing time       : 0.032 s
% 7.32/2.72  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.32/2.72  
% 7.32/2.72  # Proof found!
% 7.32/2.72  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.32/2.72  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.32/2.72  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.32/2.72  
% 7.32/2.72  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.32/2.72  # User time                : 0.055 s
% 7.32/2.72  # System time              : 0.015 s
% 7.32/2.72  # Total time               : 0.069 s
% 7.32/2.72  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.32/2.72  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------