TSTP Solution File: CSR115+42 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+42 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.12s 2.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 28 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 28 RR)
% Number of literals : 78 ( 0 equ; 61 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 68 ( 37 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_691,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-oh3izm7q/lgb.p',i_0_691) ).
cnf(i_0_204,hypothesis,
val(c2254,bmw_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-oh3izm7q/lgb.p',i_0_204) ).
cnf(i_0_205,hypothesis,
sub(c2254,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-oh3izm7q/lgb.p',i_0_205) ).
cnf(i_0_206,hypothesis,
sub(c2253,firma_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-oh3izm7q/lgb.p',i_0_206) ).
cnf(i_0_207,hypothesis,
attr(c2253,c2254),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-oh3izm7q/lgb.p',i_0_207) ).
cnf(i_0_670,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-oh3izm7q/lgb.p',i_0_670) ).
cnf(i_0_687,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-oh3izm7q/lgb.p',i_0_687) ).
cnf(i_0_689,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-oh3izm7q/lgb.p',i_0_689) ).
cnf(i_0_688,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-oh3izm7q/lgb.p',i_0_688) ).
cnf(c_0_701,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
i_0_691 ).
cnf(c_0_702,hypothesis,
val(c2254,bmw_0),
i_0_204 ).
cnf(c_0_703,hypothesis,
sub(c2254,name_1_1),
i_0_205 ).
cnf(c_0_704,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
| ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c2254)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ obj(X6,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_701,c_0_702]),c_0_703])]) ).
cnf(c_0_705,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c2254)
| ~ attr(X2,c2254)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ obj(X5,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_704,c_0_702]),c_0_703])]) ).
cnf(c_0_706,hypothesis,
sub(c2253,firma_1_1),
i_0_206 ).
cnf(c_0_707,hypothesis,
attr(c2253,c2254),
i_0_207 ).
cnf(c_0_708,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c2254)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ obj(X4,c2253) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_705,c_0_706]),c_0_707])]) ).
cnf(c_0_709,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ obj(X3,c2253) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_708,c_0_707]) ).
cnf(c_0_710,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
i_0_670 ).
cnf(c_0_711,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X1,X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,c2253)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_709,c_0_710]) ).
cnf(c_0_712,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_687 ).
cnf(c_0_713,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c2253)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X4,X5) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_711,c_0_712]) ).
cnf(c_0_714,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_689 ).
cnf(c_0_715,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(c2253,X1),X2)
| ~ sub(c2253,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_713,c_0_714]) ).
cnf(c_0_716,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_688 ).
cnf(c_0_717,plain,
( ~ sub(c2253,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_715,c_0_716]) ).
cnf(c_0_718,hypothesis,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_717,c_0_706]) ).
cnf(c_0_719,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_707,c_0_718]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : CSR115+42 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 05:02:13 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.37/0.58 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.37/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.37/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.12/2.56 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.12/2.56 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.12/2.56 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.12/2.56 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.12/2.56 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.12/2.56 #
% 7.12/2.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.026 s
% 7.12/2.56 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.12/2.56
% 7.12/2.56 # Proof found!
% 7.12/2.56 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.12/2.56 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.12/2.56 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.12/2.56
% 7.12/2.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.12/2.56 # User time : 0.053 s
% 7.12/2.56 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.12/2.56 # Total time : 0.058 s
% 7.12/2.56 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.12/2.56
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------