TSTP Solution File: CSR115+37 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR115+37 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.00s 2.77s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  19 unt;   0 nHn;  30 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   96 (   0 equ;  75 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;  11 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   55 (  17 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_708,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ attr(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ val(X2,X7)
    | ~ temp(X8,X1)
    | ~ sub(X2,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X5,firma_1_1)
    | ~ val(X4,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
    | ~ has_card_leq(X7,int1994) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t1ox3vc0/lgb.p',i_0_708) ).

cnf(i_0_530,plain,
    ( has_card_leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ card(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t1ox3vc0/lgb.p',i_0_530) ).

cnf(i_0_148,hypothesis,
    card(c102,int1994),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t1ox3vc0/lgb.p',i_0_148) ).

cnf(i_0_210,hypothesis,
    sub(c94,name_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t1ox3vc0/lgb.p',i_0_210) ).

cnf(i_0_209,hypothesis,
    val(c94,bmw_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t1ox3vc0/lgb.p',i_0_209) ).

cnf(i_0_211,hypothesis,
    sub(c93,firma_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t1ox3vc0/lgb.p',i_0_211) ).

cnf(i_0_212,hypothesis,
    attr(c93,c94),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t1ox3vc0/lgb.p',i_0_212) ).

cnf(i_0_222,hypothesis,
    sub(c107,jahr__1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t1ox3vc0/lgb.p',i_0_222) ).

cnf(i_0_221,hypothesis,
    val(c107,c102),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t1ox3vc0/lgb.p',i_0_221) ).

cnf(i_0_225,hypothesis,
    temp(c100,c106),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t1ox3vc0/lgb.p',i_0_225) ).

cnf(i_0_223,hypothesis,
    attr(c106,c107),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t1ox3vc0/lgb.p',i_0_223) ).

cnf(c_0_720,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ attr(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ val(X2,X7)
    | ~ temp(X8,X1)
    | ~ sub(X2,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X5,firma_1_1)
    | ~ val(X4,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
    | ~ has_card_leq(X7,int1994) ),
    i_0_708 ).

cnf(c_0_721,plain,
    ( has_card_leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ card(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_530 ).

cnf(c_0_722,plain,
    ( ~ card(X1,int1994)
    | ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X3,firma_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X5,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ temp(X6,X7)
    | ~ val(X2,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X4,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X5,X1)
    | ~ attr(X3,X2)
    | ~ attr(X8,X4)
    | ~ attr(X7,X5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_720,c_0_721]) ).

cnf(c_0_723,hypothesis,
    card(c102,int1994),
    i_0_148 ).

cnf(c_0_724,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X3,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ temp(X5,X6)
    | ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X3,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X4,c102)
    | ~ attr(X2,X1)
    | ~ attr(X7,X3)
    | ~ attr(X6,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_722,c_0_723]) ).

cnf(c_0_725,hypothesis,
    sub(c94,name_1_1),
    i_0_210 ).

cnf(c_0_726,hypothesis,
    val(c94,bmw_0),
    i_0_209 ).

cnf(c_0_727,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X3,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ temp(X4,X5)
    | ~ val(X2,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X3,c102)
    | ~ attr(X1,c94)
    | ~ attr(X6,X2)
    | ~ attr(X5,X3) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_724,c_0_725]),c_0_726])]) ).

cnf(c_0_728,hypothesis,
    sub(c93,firma_1_1),
    i_0_211 ).

cnf(c_0_729,hypothesis,
    attr(c93,c94),
    i_0_212 ).

cnf(c_0_730,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ temp(X3,X4)
    | ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X2,c102)
    | ~ attr(X5,X1)
    | ~ attr(X4,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_727,c_0_728]),c_0_729])]) ).

cnf(c_0_731,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ temp(X2,X3)
    | ~ val(X1,c102)
    | ~ attr(X4,c94)
    | ~ attr(X3,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_730,c_0_725]),c_0_726])]) ).

cnf(c_0_732,hypothesis,
    sub(c107,jahr__1_1),
    i_0_222 ).

cnf(c_0_733,hypothesis,
    val(c107,c102),
    i_0_221 ).

cnf(c_0_734,hypothesis,
    ( ~ temp(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,c94)
    | ~ attr(X2,c107) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_731,c_0_732]),c_0_733])]) ).

cnf(c_0_735,hypothesis,
    ( ~ temp(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X2,c107) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_734,c_0_729]) ).

cnf(c_0_736,hypothesis,
    temp(c100,c106),
    i_0_225 ).

cnf(c_0_737,hypothesis,
    attr(c106,c107),
    i_0_223 ).

cnf(c_0_738,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_735,c_0_736]),c_0_737])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : CSR115+37 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 20:56:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.43/0.61  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/0.61  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.43/0.61  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.43/0.61  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.00/2.77  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.00/2.77  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.00/2.77  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.00/2.77  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.00/2.77  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.00/2.77  #
% 7.00/2.77  # Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 7.00/2.77  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.00/2.77  
% 7.00/2.77  # Proof found!
% 7.00/2.77  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.00/2.77  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.00/2.77  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.00/2.77  
% 7.00/2.77  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.00/2.77  # User time                : 0.032 s
% 7.00/2.77  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 7.00/2.77  # Total time               : 0.040 s
% 7.00/2.77  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.00/2.77  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------