TSTP Solution File: CSR115+36 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+36 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.98s 3.03s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.98s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 47 ( 0 equ; 36 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 20 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_677,negated_conjecture,
( ~ agt(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xyv2lru9/lgb.p',i_0_677) ).
cnf(i_0_187,hypothesis,
val(c429,bmw_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xyv2lru9/lgb.p',i_0_187) ).
cnf(i_0_188,hypothesis,
sub(c429,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xyv2lru9/lgb.p',i_0_188) ).
cnf(i_0_189,hypothesis,
sub(c428,firma_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xyv2lru9/lgb.p',i_0_189) ).
cnf(i_0_190,hypothesis,
attr(c428,c429),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xyv2lru9/lgb.p',i_0_190) ).
cnf(i_0_178,hypothesis,
agt(c6,c428),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xyv2lru9/lgb.p',i_0_178) ).
cnf(c_0_684,negated_conjecture,
( ~ agt(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0) ),
i_0_677 ).
cnf(c_0_685,hypothesis,
val(c429,bmw_0),
i_0_187 ).
cnf(c_0_686,hypothesis,
sub(c429,name_1_1),
i_0_188 ).
cnf(c_0_687,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
| ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X3,c429)
| ~ attr(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ agt(X6,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_684,c_0_685]),c_0_686])]) ).
cnf(c_0_688,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c429)
| ~ attr(X1,c429)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ agt(X5,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_687,c_0_685]),c_0_686])]) ).
cnf(c_0_689,hypothesis,
sub(c428,firma_1_1),
i_0_189 ).
cnf(c_0_690,hypothesis,
attr(c428,c429),
i_0_190 ).
cnf(c_0_691,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c429)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ agt(X4,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_688,c_0_689]),c_0_690])]) ).
cnf(c_0_692,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ agt(X3,c428) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_691,c_0_690]) ).
cnf(c_0_693,hypothesis,
agt(c6,c428),
i_0_178 ).
cnf(c_0_694,hypothesis,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_692,c_0_693]) ).
cnf(c_0_695,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_690,c_0_694]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : CSR115+36 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 11:08:20 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.39 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.14/0.53 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.53 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.14/0.53 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.14/0.53 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.98/3.03 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.98/3.03 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.98/3.03 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.98/3.03 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.98/3.03 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.98/3.03 #
% 8.98/3.03 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 8.98/3.03 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.98/3.03
% 8.98/3.03 # Proof found!
% 8.98/3.03 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.98/3.03 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.98/3.03 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.98/3.03
% 8.98/3.03 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.98/3.03 # User time : 0.040 s
% 8.98/3.03 # System time : 0.008 s
% 8.98/3.03 # Total time : 0.048 s
% 8.98/3.03 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.98/3.03
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------