TSTP Solution File: CSR115+34 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+34 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 5.00s 2.80s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.00s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 40 ( 19 unt; 0 nHn; 40 RR)
% Number of literals : 101 ( 0 equ; 74 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 9 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 12 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 72 ( 27 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_701,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ val(X4,X7)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ has_card_leq(X7,int1994) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8kzk3_cr/lgb.p',i_0_701) ).
cnf(i_0_523,plain,
( has_card_leq(X1,X2)
| ~ card(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8kzk3_cr/lgb.p',i_0_523) ).
cnf(i_0_88,hypothesis,
card(c3529,int1994),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8kzk3_cr/lgb.p',i_0_88) ).
cnf(i_0_216,hypothesis,
sub(c3447,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8kzk3_cr/lgb.p',i_0_216) ).
cnf(i_0_215,hypothesis,
val(c3447,bmw_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8kzk3_cr/lgb.p',i_0_215) ).
cnf(i_0_209,hypothesis,
sub(c3532,jahr__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8kzk3_cr/lgb.p',i_0_209) ).
cnf(i_0_208,hypothesis,
val(c3532,c3529),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8kzk3_cr/lgb.p',i_0_208) ).
cnf(i_0_213,hypothesis,
sub(c3527,firma_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8kzk3_cr/lgb.p',i_0_213) ).
cnf(i_0_218,hypothesis,
attr(c3446,c3447),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8kzk3_cr/lgb.p',i_0_218) ).
cnf(i_0_210,hypothesis,
attr(c3531,c3532),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8kzk3_cr/lgb.p',i_0_210) ).
cnf(i_0_680,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8kzk3_cr/lgb.p',i_0_680) ).
cnf(i_0_697,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8kzk3_cr/lgb.p',i_0_697) ).
cnf(i_0_698,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8kzk3_cr/lgb.p',i_0_698) ).
cnf(i_0_699,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8kzk3_cr/lgb.p',i_0_699) ).
cnf(c_0_716,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ val(X4,X7)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ has_card_leq(X7,int1994) ),
i_0_701 ).
cnf(c_0_717,plain,
( has_card_leq(X1,X2)
| ~ card(X1,X2) ),
i_0_523 ).
cnf(c_0_718,plain,
( ~ card(X1,int1994)
| ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X2,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X3,X1)
| ~ attr(X5,X2)
| ~ attr(X6,X3)
| ~ obj(X7,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_716,c_0_717]) ).
cnf(c_0_719,hypothesis,
card(c3529,int1994),
i_0_88 ).
cnf(c_0_720,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X2,c3529)
| ~ attr(X4,X1)
| ~ attr(X5,X2)
| ~ obj(X6,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_718,c_0_719]) ).
cnf(c_0_721,hypothesis,
sub(c3447,name_1_1),
i_0_216 ).
cnf(c_0_722,hypothesis,
val(c3447,bmw_0),
i_0_215 ).
cnf(c_0_723,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X1,c3529)
| ~ attr(X3,c3447)
| ~ attr(X4,X1)
| ~ obj(X5,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_720,c_0_721]),c_0_722])]) ).
cnf(c_0_724,hypothesis,
sub(c3532,jahr__1_1),
i_0_209 ).
cnf(c_0_725,hypothesis,
val(c3532,c3529),
i_0_208 ).
cnf(c_0_726,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c3447)
| ~ attr(X3,c3532)
| ~ obj(X4,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_723,c_0_724]),c_0_725])]) ).
cnf(c_0_727,hypothesis,
sub(c3527,firma_1_1),
i_0_213 ).
cnf(c_0_728,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c3447)
| ~ attr(X2,c3532)
| ~ obj(X3,c3527) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_726,c_0_727]) ).
cnf(c_0_729,hypothesis,
attr(c3446,c3447),
i_0_218 ).
cnf(c_0_730,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c3532)
| ~ obj(X2,c3527) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_728,c_0_729]) ).
cnf(c_0_731,hypothesis,
attr(c3531,c3532),
i_0_210 ).
cnf(c_0_732,hypothesis,
~ obj(X1,c3527),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_730,c_0_731]) ).
cnf(c_0_733,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
i_0_680 ).
cnf(c_0_734,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X1,X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,c3527) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_732,c_0_733]) ).
cnf(c_0_735,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_697 ).
cnf(c_0_736,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c3527)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_734,c_0_735]) ).
cnf(c_0_737,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_698 ).
cnf(c_0_738,plain,
( ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c3527)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_736,c_0_737]) ).
cnf(c_0_739,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_699 ).
cnf(c_0_740,plain,
~ sub(c3527,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_738,c_0_739]) ).
cnf(c_0_741,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_727,c_0_740]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR115+34 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 11:58:29 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.37/0.62 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.37/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.37/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 5.00/2.80 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 5.00/2.80 # No SInE strategy applied
% 5.00/2.80 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 5.00/2.80 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 5.00/2.80 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 5.00/2.80 #
% 5.00/2.80 # Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% 5.00/2.80 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.00/2.80
% 5.00/2.80 # Proof found!
% 5.00/2.80 # SZS status Theorem
% 5.00/2.80 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.00/2.80 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 5.00/2.80
% 5.00/2.80 # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.00/2.80 # User time : 0.057 s
% 5.00/2.80 # System time : 0.008 s
% 5.00/2.80 # Total time : 0.065 s
% 5.00/2.80 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 5.00/2.80
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------