TSTP Solution File: CSR115+32 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+32 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.93s 2.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.93s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 34 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 34 RR)
% Number of literals : 93 ( 0 equ; 71 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 80 ( 41 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_646,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f4m9vocg/lgb.p',i_0_646) ).
cnf(i_0_153,hypothesis,
val(c187,bmw_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f4m9vocg/lgb.p',i_0_153) ).
cnf(i_0_154,hypothesis,
sub(c187,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f4m9vocg/lgb.p',i_0_154) ).
cnf(i_0_645,plain,
( sub(X1,X2)
| ~ sub(X3,X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f4m9vocg/lgb.p',i_0_645) ).
cnf(i_0_147,hypothesis,
sub(verpackungsfirma_1_1,firma_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f4m9vocg/lgb.p',i_0_147) ).
cnf(i_0_155,hypothesis,
sub(c186,verpackungsfirma_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f4m9vocg/lgb.p',i_0_155) ).
cnf(i_0_156,hypothesis,
attr(c186,c187),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f4m9vocg/lgb.p',i_0_156) ).
cnf(i_0_625,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f4m9vocg/lgb.p',i_0_625) ).
cnf(i_0_642,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f4m9vocg/lgb.p',i_0_642) ).
cnf(i_0_644,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f4m9vocg/lgb.p',i_0_644) ).
cnf(i_0_643,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f4m9vocg/lgb.p',i_0_643) ).
cnf(c_0_658,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
i_0_646 ).
cnf(c_0_659,hypothesis,
val(c187,bmw_0),
i_0_153 ).
cnf(c_0_660,hypothesis,
sub(c187,name_1_1),
i_0_154 ).
cnf(c_0_661,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
| ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c187)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ obj(X6,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_658,c_0_659]),c_0_660])]) ).
cnf(c_0_662,plain,
( sub(X1,X2)
| ~ sub(X3,X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X3) ),
i_0_645 ).
cnf(c_0_663,hypothesis,
sub(verpackungsfirma_1_1,firma_1_1),
i_0_147 ).
cnf(c_0_664,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c187)
| ~ attr(X2,c187)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ obj(X5,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_661,c_0_659]),c_0_660])]) ).
cnf(c_0_665,hypothesis,
( sub(X1,firma_1_1)
| ~ sub(X1,verpackungsfirma_1_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_662,c_0_663]) ).
cnf(c_0_666,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,verpackungsfirma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c187)
| ~ attr(X2,c187)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ obj(X5,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_664,c_0_665]) ).
cnf(c_0_667,hypothesis,
sub(c186,verpackungsfirma_1_1),
i_0_155 ).
cnf(c_0_668,hypothesis,
attr(c186,c187),
i_0_156 ).
cnf(c_0_669,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c187)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ obj(X4,c186) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_666,c_0_667]),c_0_668])]) ).
cnf(c_0_670,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ obj(X3,c186) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_669,c_0_668]) ).
cnf(c_0_671,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
i_0_625 ).
cnf(c_0_672,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X1,X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,c186)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_670,c_0_671]) ).
cnf(c_0_673,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_642 ).
cnf(c_0_674,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c186)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X4,X5) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_672,c_0_673]) ).
cnf(c_0_675,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_644 ).
cnf(c_0_676,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(c186,X1),X2)
| ~ sub(c186,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_674,c_0_675]) ).
cnf(c_0_677,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_643 ).
cnf(c_0_678,plain,
( ~ sub(c186,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_676,c_0_677]) ).
cnf(c_0_679,hypothesis,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_678,c_0_665]),c_0_667])]) ).
cnf(c_0_680,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_668,c_0_679]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : CSR115+32 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 21:56:56 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.47/0.65 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.65 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.47/0.65 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.47/0.65 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 4.93/2.72 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 4.93/2.72 # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.93/2.72 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.93/2.72 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 4.93/2.72 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 4.93/2.72 #
% 4.93/2.72 # Preprocessing time : 0.031 s
% 4.93/2.72 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.93/2.72
% 4.93/2.72 # Proof found!
% 4.93/2.72 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.93/2.72 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.93/2.72 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.93/2.72
% 4.93/2.72 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.93/2.72 # User time : 0.050 s
% 4.93/2.72 # System time : 0.009 s
% 4.93/2.72 # Total time : 0.059 s
% 4.93/2.72 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 4.93/2.72
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------