TSTP Solution File: CSR115+25 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+25 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.21s 2.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 30 RR)
% Number of literals : 80 ( 0 equ; 61 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 8 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 68 ( 37 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_904,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p22sh82r/lgb.p',i_0_904) ).
cnf(i_0_390,hypothesis,
val(c133464,bmw_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p22sh82r/lgb.p',i_0_390) ).
cnf(i_0_391,hypothesis,
sub(c133464,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p22sh82r/lgb.p',i_0_391) ).
cnf(i_0_392,hypothesis,
sub(c133463,firma_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p22sh82r/lgb.p',i_0_392) ).
cnf(i_0_393,hypothesis,
attr(c133463,c133464),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p22sh82r/lgb.p',i_0_393) ).
cnf(i_0_883,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p22sh82r/lgb.p',i_0_883) ).
cnf(i_0_900,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p22sh82r/lgb.p',i_0_900) ).
cnf(i_0_902,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p22sh82r/lgb.p',i_0_902) ).
cnf(i_0_901,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p22sh82r/lgb.p',i_0_901) ).
cnf(i_0_401,hypothesis,
attr(c133411,c133412),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p22sh82r/lgb.p',i_0_401) ).
cnf(c_0_915,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
i_0_904 ).
cnf(c_0_916,hypothesis,
val(c133464,bmw_0),
i_0_390 ).
cnf(c_0_917,hypothesis,
sub(c133464,name_1_1),
i_0_391 ).
cnf(c_0_918,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
| ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c133464)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ obj(X6,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_915,c_0_916]),c_0_917])]) ).
cnf(c_0_919,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c133464)
| ~ attr(X2,c133464)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ obj(X5,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_918,c_0_916]),c_0_917])]) ).
cnf(c_0_920,hypothesis,
sub(c133463,firma_1_1),
i_0_392 ).
cnf(c_0_921,hypothesis,
attr(c133463,c133464),
i_0_393 ).
cnf(c_0_922,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c133464)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ obj(X4,c133463) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_919,c_0_920]),c_0_921])]) ).
cnf(c_0_923,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ obj(X3,c133463) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_922,c_0_921]) ).
cnf(c_0_924,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
i_0_883 ).
cnf(c_0_925,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X1,X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,c133463)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_923,c_0_924]) ).
cnf(c_0_926,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_900 ).
cnf(c_0_927,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c133463)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X4,X5) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_925,c_0_926]) ).
cnf(c_0_928,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_902 ).
cnf(c_0_929,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(c133463,X1),X2)
| ~ sub(c133463,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_927,c_0_928]) ).
cnf(c_0_930,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_901 ).
cnf(c_0_931,plain,
( ~ sub(c133463,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_929,c_0_930]) ).
cnf(c_0_932,hypothesis,
attr(c133411,c133412),
i_0_401 ).
cnf(c_0_933,hypothesis,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_931,c_0_920]) ).
cnf(c_0_934,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_932,c_0_933]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR115+25 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 16:39:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.38/0.60 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.38/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.38/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.21/2.62 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.21/2.62 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.21/2.62 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.21/2.62 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.21/2.62 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.21/2.62 #
% 7.21/2.62 # Preprocessing time : 0.032 s
% 7.21/2.62 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.21/2.62
% 7.21/2.62 # Proof found!
% 7.21/2.62 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.21/2.62 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.21/2.62 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.21/2.62
% 7.21/2.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.21/2.62 # User time : 0.060 s
% 7.21/2.62 # System time : 0.009 s
% 7.21/2.62 # Total time : 0.069 s
% 7.21/2.62 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.21/2.62
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------