TSTP Solution File: CSR115+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR115+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:15 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.19s 2.75s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   27 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;  27 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   64 (   0 equ;  47 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (  33 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_830,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ obj(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ val(X6,bmw_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8hk2nlh7/lgb.p',i_0_830) ).

cnf(i_0_311,hypothesis,
    val(c1167,bmw_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8hk2nlh7/lgb.p',i_0_311) ).

cnf(i_0_312,hypothesis,
    sub(c1167,name_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8hk2nlh7/lgb.p',i_0_312) ).

cnf(i_0_292,hypothesis,
    sub(c73,firma_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8hk2nlh7/lgb.p',i_0_292) ).

cnf(i_0_314,hypothesis,
    attr(c1166,c1167),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8hk2nlh7/lgb.p',i_0_314) ).

cnf(i_0_809,plain,
    ( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X3)
    | ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8hk2nlh7/lgb.p',i_0_809) ).

cnf(i_0_826,plain,
    ( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8hk2nlh7/lgb.p',i_0_826) ).

cnf(i_0_828,plain,
    ( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8hk2nlh7/lgb.p',i_0_828) ).

cnf(i_0_827,plain,
    ( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8hk2nlh7/lgb.p',i_0_827) ).

cnf(c_0_840,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ obj(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ val(X6,bmw_0) ),
    i_0_830 ).

cnf(c_0_841,hypothesis,
    val(c1167,bmw_0),
    i_0_311 ).

cnf(c_0_842,hypothesis,
    sub(c1167,name_1_1),
    i_0_312 ).

cnf(c_0_843,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
    | ~ attr(X2,c1167)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ obj(X5,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_840,c_0_841]),c_0_842])]) ).

cnf(c_0_844,hypothesis,
    sub(c73,firma_1_1),
    i_0_292 ).

cnf(c_0_845,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,c1167)
    | ~ attr(X2,X3)
    | ~ obj(X4,c73) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_843,c_0_844]) ).

cnf(c_0_846,hypothesis,
    attr(c1166,c1167),
    i_0_314 ).

cnf(c_0_847,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,X2)
    | ~ obj(X3,c73) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_845,c_0_846]) ).

cnf(c_0_848,plain,
    ( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X3)
    | ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
    i_0_809 ).

cnf(c_0_849,hypothesis,
    ( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,c73)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_847,c_0_848]) ).

cnf(c_0_850,plain,
    ( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_826 ).

cnf(c_0_851,plain,
    ( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c73)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X4,X5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_849,c_0_850]) ).

cnf(c_0_852,plain,
    ( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_828 ).

cnf(c_0_853,plain,
    ( ~ arg2(esk59_2(c73,X1),X2)
    | ~ sub(c73,X1)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_851,c_0_852]) ).

cnf(c_0_854,plain,
    ( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_827 ).

cnf(c_0_855,plain,
    ( ~ sub(c73,X1)
    | ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_853,c_0_854]) ).

cnf(c_0_856,hypothesis,
    ~ attr(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_855,c_0_844]) ).

cnf(c_0_857,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_846,c_0_856]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.10  % Problem  : CSR115+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 16:09:52 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.42  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.17/0.57  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.57  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.17/0.57  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.17/0.57  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.19/2.75  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.19/2.75  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.19/2.75  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.19/2.75  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.19/2.75  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.19/2.75  #
% 8.19/2.75  # Preprocessing time       : 0.028 s
% 8.19/2.75  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.19/2.75  
% 8.19/2.75  # Proof found!
% 8.19/2.75  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.19/2.75  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.19/2.75  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.19/2.75  
% 8.19/2.75  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.19/2.75  # User time                : 0.058 s
% 8.19/2.75  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 8.19/2.75  # Total time               : 0.065 s
% 8.19/2.75  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 8.19/2.75  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------