TSTP Solution File: CSR114+27 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR114+27 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.96s 2.71s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 66 ( 0 equ; 45 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_639,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X3,X1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X2,X5)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2zme57yf/input.p',i_0_639) ).
cnf(i_0_149,hypothesis,
val(c32,rom_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2zme57yf/input.p',i_0_149) ).
cnf(i_0_150,hypothesis,
sub(c32,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2zme57yf/input.p',i_0_150) ).
cnf(i_0_507,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2zme57yf/input.p',i_0_507) ).
cnf(i_0_506,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2zme57yf/input.p',i_0_506) ).
cnf(i_0_508,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2zme57yf/input.p',i_0_508) ).
cnf(i_0_154,hypothesis,
loc(c25,c34),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2zme57yf/input.p',i_0_154) ).
cnf(i_0_153,hypothesis,
sub(c25,kolosseum_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2zme57yf/input.p',i_0_153) ).
cnf(i_0_148,hypothesis,
in(c34,c31),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2zme57yf/input.p',i_0_148) ).
cnf(i_0_152,hypothesis,
attr(c31,c32),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2zme57yf/input.p',i_0_152) ).
cnf(i_0_151,hypothesis,
sub(c31,stadt__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2zme57yf/input.p',i_0_151) ).
cnf(c_0_651,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X3,X1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X2,X5)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
i_0_639 ).
cnf(c_0_652,hypothesis,
val(c32,rom_0),
i_0_149 ).
cnf(c_0_653,hypothesis,
sub(c32,name_1_1),
i_0_150 ).
cnf(c_0_654,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,c32)
| ~ sub(X2,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,stadt__1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X4)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ in(X4,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_651,c_0_652]),c_0_653])]) ).
cnf(c_0_655,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_507 ).
cnf(c_0_656,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_506 ).
cnf(c_0_657,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,c32)
| ~ sub(X2,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ loc(esk27_2(X2,X3),X4)
| ~ loc(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_654,c_0_655]),c_0_656]) ).
cnf(c_0_658,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_508 ).
cnf(c_0_659,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,c32)
| ~ sub(X2,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ loc(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_657,c_0_658]) ).
cnf(c_0_660,hypothesis,
loc(c25,c34),
i_0_154 ).
cnf(c_0_661,hypothesis,
sub(c25,kolosseum_1_1),
i_0_153 ).
cnf(c_0_662,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c32)
| ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ in(c34,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_659,c_0_660]),c_0_661])]) ).
cnf(c_0_663,hypothesis,
in(c34,c31),
i_0_148 ).
cnf(c_0_664,hypothesis,
attr(c31,c32),
i_0_152 ).
cnf(c_0_665,hypothesis,
sub(c31,stadt__1_1),
i_0_151 ).
cnf(c_0_666,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_662,c_0_663]),c_0_664]),c_0_665])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR114+27 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 18:24:05 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.39/0.59 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.39/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.39/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 4.96/2.71 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 4.96/2.71 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 4.96/2.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 4.96/2.71
% 4.96/2.71 # Proof found!
% 4.96/2.71 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.96/2.71 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.96/2.71 # Proof object total steps : 27
% 4.96/2.71 # Proof object clause steps : 16
% 4.96/2.71 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 4.96/2.71 # Proof object conjectures : 3
% 4.96/2.71 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 4.96/2.71 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 4.96/2.71 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 4.96/2.71 # Proof object initial formulas used : 11
% 4.96/2.71 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 4.96/2.71 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 8
% 4.96/2.71 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.96/2.71 # Parsed axioms : 659
% 4.96/2.71 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # Initial clauses : 659
% 4.96/2.71 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # Initial clauses in saturation : 659
% 4.96/2.71 # Processed clauses : 669
% 4.96/2.71 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # ...subsumed : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # ...remaining for further processing : 669
% 4.96/2.71 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # Generated clauses : 1605
% 4.96/2.71 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1604
% 4.96/2.71 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 4.96/2.71 # Paramodulations : 1605
% 4.96/2.71 # Factorizations : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # Current number of processed clauses : 669
% 4.96/2.71 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 353
% 4.96/2.71 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 4.96/2.71 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # Non-unit-clauses : 316
% 4.96/2.71 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1594
% 4.96/2.71 # ...number of literals in the above : 5188
% 4.96/2.71 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20270
% 4.96/2.71 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8231
% 4.96/2.71 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 4.96/2.71 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1110
% 4.96/2.71 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # Condensation successes : 0
% 4.96/2.71 # Termbank termtop insertions : 31482
% 4.96/2.71
% 4.96/2.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.96/2.71 # User time : 0.045 s
% 4.96/2.71 # System time : 0.008 s
% 4.96/2.71 # Total time : 0.053 s
% 4.96/2.71 # ...preprocessing : 0.021 s
% 4.96/2.71 # ...main loop : 0.032 s
% 4.96/2.71 # Maximum resident set size: 9188 pages
% 4.96/2.71
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------