TSTP Solution File: CSR114+24 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR114+24 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.52s 2.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 48 ( 0 equ; 33 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 8 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 16 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_810,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X4,rom_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6s7po82m/lgb.p',i_0_810) ).
cnf(i_0_311,hypothesis,
val(c49955,rom_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6s7po82m/lgb.p',i_0_311) ).
cnf(i_0_312,hypothesis,
sub(c49955,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6s7po82m/lgb.p',i_0_312) ).
cnf(i_0_313,hypothesis,
sub(c49954,stadt__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6s7po82m/lgb.p',i_0_313) ).
cnf(i_0_314,hypothesis,
attr(c49954,c49955),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6s7po82m/lgb.p',i_0_314) ).
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6s7po82m/lgb.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_681,plain,
( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6s7po82m/lgb.p',i_0_681) ).
cnf(i_0_680,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6s7po82m/lgb.p',i_0_680) ).
cnf(c_0_819,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X4,rom_0) ),
i_0_810 ).
cnf(c_0_820,hypothesis,
val(c49955,rom_0),
i_0_311 ).
cnf(c_0_821,hypothesis,
sub(c49955,name_1_1),
i_0_312 ).
cnf(c_0_822,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c49955)
| ~ scar(X2,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_819,c_0_820]),c_0_821])]) ).
cnf(c_0_823,hypothesis,
sub(c49954,stadt__1_1),
i_0_313 ).
cnf(c_0_824,hypothesis,
attr(c49954,c49955),
i_0_314 ).
cnf(c_0_825,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_826,hypothesis,
~ scar(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_822,c_0_823]),c_0_824])]) ).
cnf(c_0_827,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_825,c_0_826]) ).
cnf(c_0_828,plain,
( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
i_0_681 ).
cnf(c_0_829,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_827,c_0_828]) ).
cnf(c_0_830,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(name_1_1,nil))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_829,c_0_828]) ).
cnf(c_0_831,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
i_0_680 ).
cnf(c_0_832,plain,
( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_830,c_0_831]) ).
cnf(c_0_833,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_832,c_0_824]),c_0_821])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : CSR114+24 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 10:58:56 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.13/0.49 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.13/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.13/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.52/2.58 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.52/2.58 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.52/2.58 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.52/2.58 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.52/2.58 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.52/2.58 #
% 7.52/2.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 7.52/2.58 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.52/2.58
% 7.52/2.58 # Proof found!
% 7.52/2.58 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.52/2.58 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.52/2.58 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.52/2.58
% 7.52/2.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.52/2.58 # User time : 0.036 s
% 7.52/2.58 # System time : 0.006 s
% 7.52/2.58 # Total time : 0.042 s
% 7.52/2.58 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.52/2.58
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------