TSTP Solution File: CSR114+21 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR114+21 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.79s 2.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 30 RR)
% Number of literals : 67 ( 0 equ; 43 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 32 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_610,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X3,X1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X2,X5)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dugtj8q4/lgb.p',i_0_610) ).
cnf(i_0_124,hypothesis,
val(c13,rom_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dugtj8q4/lgb.p',i_0_124) ).
cnf(i_0_125,hypothesis,
sub(c13,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dugtj8q4/lgb.p',i_0_125) ).
cnf(i_0_119,hypothesis,
sub(c5,kolosseum_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dugtj8q4/lgb.p',i_0_119) ).
cnf(i_0_126,hypothesis,
sub(c12,stadt__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dugtj8q4/lgb.p',i_0_126) ).
cnf(i_0_127,hypothesis,
attr(c12,c13),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dugtj8q4/lgb.p',i_0_127) ).
cnf(i_0_477,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dugtj8q4/lgb.p',i_0_477) ).
cnf(i_0_120,hypothesis,
loc(c5,c30),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dugtj8q4/lgb.p',i_0_120) ).
cnf(i_0_478,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dugtj8q4/lgb.p',i_0_478) ).
cnf(i_0_479,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dugtj8q4/lgb.p',i_0_479) ).
cnf(i_0_121,hypothesis,
in(c30,c12),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dugtj8q4/lgb.p',i_0_121) ).
cnf(c_0_622,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X3,X1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X2,X5)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
i_0_610 ).
cnf(c_0_623,hypothesis,
val(c13,rom_0),
i_0_124 ).
cnf(c_0_624,hypothesis,
sub(c13,name_1_1),
i_0_125 ).
cnf(c_0_625,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c13)
| ~ scar(X3,X1)
| ~ loc(X3,X4)
| ~ in(X4,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_622,c_0_623]),c_0_624])]) ).
cnf(c_0_626,hypothesis,
sub(c5,kolosseum_1_1),
i_0_119 ).
cnf(c_0_627,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ subs(X2,stehen_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c13)
| ~ scar(X2,c5)
| ~ loc(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_625,c_0_626]) ).
cnf(c_0_628,hypothesis,
sub(c12,stadt__1_1),
i_0_126 ).
cnf(c_0_629,hypothesis,
attr(c12,c13),
i_0_127 ).
cnf(c_0_630,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_477 ).
cnf(c_0_631,hypothesis,
loc(c5,c30),
i_0_120 ).
cnf(c_0_632,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_478 ).
cnf(c_0_633,hypothesis,
( ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ scar(X1,c5)
| ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X2,c12) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_627,c_0_628]),c_0_629])]) ).
cnf(c_0_634,hypothesis,
subs(esk27_2(c5,c30),stehen_1_1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_630,c_0_631]) ).
cnf(c_0_635,hypothesis,
scar(esk27_2(c5,c30),c5),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_632,c_0_631]) ).
cnf(c_0_636,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_479 ).
cnf(c_0_637,hypothesis,
( ~ loc(esk27_2(c5,c30),X1)
| ~ in(X1,c12) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_633,c_0_634]),c_0_635])]) ).
cnf(c_0_638,hypothesis,
loc(esk27_2(c5,c30),c30),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_636,c_0_631]) ).
cnf(c_0_639,hypothesis,
in(c30,c12),
i_0_121 ).
cnf(c_0_640,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_637,c_0_638]),c_0_639])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR114+21 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 01:22:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.38/0.62 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.38/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.38/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.79/2.72 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.79/2.72 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.79/2.72 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.79/2.72 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S00AI
% 8.79/2.72 # and selection function SelectLargestOrientable.
% 8.79/2.72 #
% 8.79/2.72 # Preprocessing time : 0.026 s
% 8.79/2.72 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.79/2.72
% 8.79/2.72 # Proof found!
% 8.79/2.72 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.79/2.72 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.79/2.72 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.79/2.72
% 8.79/2.72 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.79/2.72 # User time : 0.041 s
% 8.79/2.72 # System time : 0.006 s
% 8.79/2.72 # Total time : 0.048 s
% 8.79/2.72 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.79/2.72
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------